similar to: Why are Samba DCs not browsable?

Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs... > The book is partially correct, nmbd shouldn't be run on a DC, but > there is a netbios server built into the samba binary but it doesn't > contain the browsing code. If you

On 29/10/15 05:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd >> process". >> >> It's true enough that I can't browse my DC, however, there is an

On 04/11/15 05:08, Gary Dale wrote: > On 29/10/15 05:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >>> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd >>> process". >>> >>>

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 14:40:10 +0100 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for taking an interest. > > On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 at 14:27, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:43:37 +0100 > > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > > > I

Let me guess. You accessing your server like : \\servername\netlogon of \\servername\sysvol Well thats protected by windows these these days. Try with \\servername.domain.tld\netlogon or \\servername.domain.tld\sysvol Does that work? Yes, There is a whole chaper of this on the list somewhere.. Best is to read howto override this. https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 and for you

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:43:37 +0100 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > I could really use some support with this. I understand it's always > possible to just restore from a backup but the more interesting > question is if something can be done with the data at hand. > Basically, I'm trying to understand how it's possible that a dbcheck > shows no

On 17/11/15 16:57, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the > AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without > any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in > computer mode*. In user mode, it all works just fine. > > Viktor > > On 17.11.2015

Here are my (little) view regarding shares accesses. I write that to clarify things. And it could really be of-topic as Louis seems to have gave solution. There are 2 levels of authorisation for accessing shares: the share level and FS level. For Sysvol I would keep everyone or replace it by "authenticated users" in paranoid mode as the latter refuse non-authenticated users. They are

On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >> Repo) and it ended with error messages about unmet dependencies in >> regards >> to libldb1. >> > Yes, but did you run 'apt-get update' first ? > >

On 22.09.2019 15:30, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 14:10, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >>>> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >>>> Repo) and it ended with error messages

On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't > think that's necessary. I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7 only, so far. Therefore I believe that e.g. the Windows Update policy is not fit for

On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >> >> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >> objects after the 'leave'? >> >> Ole >> > > Yes, first and only. As I said, it's more or less a lab setup

On 29.10.2015 18:49, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 17:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >> On 29.10.2015 17:54, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 16:21, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27.10.2015 16:16, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 27/10/15 14:58, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>>>>

On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> See replies below >>>> >>>> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 16/11/15 11:19,

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 20:52, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 29/10/15 19:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >>> On 29.10.2015 18:49, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 29/10/15 17:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 29.10.2015 17:54, Rowland Penny wrote:

There is nothing wrong with your policies. Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages. I having the same message. ( samba 4.2.5 ) Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Viktor Trojanovic > Verzonden: maandag 16 november 2015 15:54 > Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp:

On 17/11/15 17:33, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > [global] > > netbios name = FILESERVER > workgroup = SAMDOM > security = ADS > realm = SAMDOM.EXAMPLE.COM > dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab > kerberos method = secrets and keytab > > username map = /etc/samba/samba_usermap > > idmap config *:backend = tdb > idmap config *:range =

Viktor, thanks again! Now that I did this (added the Win10 1511 ADMX files to the central store), I probably will have to recreate the policies that will be applied to Win10 machines, right? Ole On 21.01.2016 17:16, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > I've been using Samba with Win10 clients for a while now, so I'm happy > to share some of my findings. > > See

Hai Victor, Sorry for these, i did not know there was still one going on in the ubuntu package. These are known since 26 july.. What i need/want to know here from which version to which version did you upgrade. I'll fix that in the next update. There where 2 things going on here. - one file moved from package. (apt --fix-broken install) - The othere was due to the changes in ldb with

Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client objects after the 'leave'? Ole Am 16.11.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: > > > On 16.11.2015 15:59, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> There is nothing wrong with your policies. >> >> Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages.