similar to: Which branch has FSMO patch in it?

The 4.3.0 release has it. See "Samba-tool now supports all 7 FSMO roles" in https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.3.0.html On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:13 PM, John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Which branch of the Samba repository has Roland Penny's FSMO patch in > it? I want to rebuild my Samba4 server packages so they resemble > something

On 06/11/2015 04:33 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 11/06/15 00:20, John Lewis wrote: >> On 05/28/2015 04:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 28/05/15 01:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>> On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >>>>>>

On 05/28/2015 04:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/05/15 01:33, John Lewis wrote: >> On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operations_%28FSMO%29_roles#Transfering_a_FSMO_role >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I ran into that

Thanks for the info. Did you create unprivileged containers to run Samba in? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com> wrote: > I have my deployment of Version 4.1.17-Debian in a Debian container. I > pretty much a standard system container with Samba installed. I run two > of them in a virtual network on a VPS as Domain controllers. Each > instance is

Hi! Indeed!, this sounds like good advice... there are certainly bugs, I had to get the 7.04.5 package from "proposed" to get resolve a PAM library issue!... although I suppose that's a packaging problem. What is the best way to get an updated Samba package here, I'm trying to make this system reproduceable, I have a single script that builds the entire container, and sets up

On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operations_%28FSMO%29_roles#Transfering_a_FSMO_role >> >> >> I ran into that while trying to rebuild my LXC's as Debian 8. The >> proposed work arrounds assume you have access to a Windows Domain >> controller in

But I do. I use Sernet packages and it's working fine. Am 25. Januar 2015 17:11:44 MEZ, schrieb John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com>: >You won't be able to use Samba AD DC functionality with Centos 7 >without >building it yourself. >http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/535153-centos-7-samba-domain-controller > >For my uses of Samba I use Debian 7. > > >On

I just transferred all the FSMO roles from DC-MIGRATE to DC1: [root at dc1 ~]# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=all FSMO transfer of 'rid' role successful FSMO transfer of 'pdc' role successful FSMO transfer of 'naming' role successful FSMO transfer of 'infrastructure' role successful FSMO transfer of 'schema' role successful I then double checked as

https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operations_%28FSMO%29_roles#Transfering_a_FSMO_role I ran into that while trying to rebuild my LXC's as Debian 8. The proposed work arrounds assume you have access to a Windows Domain controller in your domain, and I don't. Is there anything else I can do to get all 7 Roles moved to my other domain controller so I can rebuild it?

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-directory-service/ Amazon Blogged about using Samba as the base for their new AWS Directory Service.

I have a Samba-ad-dc node no longer listening on port 135 making it impossible to replicate to it and It is holding up a domain upgrade. I appended the testparam output to give someone a chance to tell me how I mis-configured it. Is it possible to configure these these Domain Controllers to replicate over LDAP instead of RPC? -------------- next part -------------- Press enter to see a dump of

Someone recently mentioned building a samba addc in a linux container. I'm new to containers and would really love to learn how to do it correctly. Anyone know of how-to's or gotcha's related making samba run in an lxc containter? -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

Maybe the output of 'samba-tool fsmo transfer --help' should include the -U parameter... > (...) if you enter 'samba-tool fsmo transfer --help' it prints amongst > the output: > > --role=ROLE?????????? The FSMO role to seize or transfer. > ??????????????????????? ....................... > ??????????????????????? ..................... >

Hello list: Sorry for my ignorance but anyone could you tell me if is possible setting automatic transference or seize fsmo roles on samba4, to avoid manual action over server, such as HA, i mean in case that my fsmo role owner crash. Best regard.

Hi, Hi, I'm having trouble transferring FSMO roles "DOMAINDNS" and FORESTDNS with below showing: samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns ERROR: Failed to delete role 'domaindns': LDAP error 50 LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS - <00002098: SecErr: DSID-031523E0, problem 4003 (INSUFF_ACCESS_RIGHTS), data 0 > <> root at samba4-dc:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer

On 04/08/2019 18:17, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote: > Hi, > > > Maybe the output of 'samba-tool fsmo transfer --help' should include > the > -U parameter and its purpose in the current context... > > I've done this > > samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns -Uadministrator > * The 'domaindns' role does not have an FSMO roleowner > That is

Hi, This way don't works too. root at samba4-dc:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=forestdns -Uadministrator Password for [EMPRESA\administrator]: ERROR: Failed to add role 'forestdns': LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <000020AE: SvcErr: DSID-03152BF7, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data 0 > <> root at samba4-dc:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns

Hi >I take it that Administrator exists (hasn't been renamed or removed) and you are using the correct password, Administrator exists and marcio too. Passwords is correct: samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns -Uadministrator * The 'domaindns' role does not have an FSMO roleowner samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns -'U administrator' * The 'domaindns'

Hello, I transfered all fsmo-roles from a DC (4.3.11-SerNet, SLES 11 SP3) to another DC (4.6.6-SerNet, SLES 12 SP2). I had to try a couple of times because of an error "Failed FSMO transfer: NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT" But then following error happened: samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=all This DC already has the 'rid' FSMO role This DC already has the 'pdc' FSMO role

So not the problem of using "seize" when both the OLD-FSMO server and NOVO-FSMo are active and on the network? The problem is to use "seize" if OLD-FSMO is not on the network and then come back? If I understood how it would be .... Regards; On 06-06-2018 15:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:35:29 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at