similar to: Questions About Bind_DLZ

On 27/10/15 03:57, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > > I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no > changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC > join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. > "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. > > See below for named.conf.

On 27/10/15 03:57, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > > I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no > changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC > join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. > "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. > > See below for named.conf.

Hi , Thank you for your input. I have had tried all of the escape characters you have have tested with but I have had no luck with them. I am curious to know which versions of net have you been tested with? I do agree that the best practice for this is to remove "-" from the beginning of the object name, However, seeing that it can be created that way allowed, I would like to find a

G'day All, I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. See below for named.conf. I'm having two issues. 1) After bind first starts up

G'day All, I've been setting up a new set of DCs, using 4.2.3 and all was going well until I tried to get a 4th DC going. I'm using bind_DLZ, and I think this is where I went wrong. I provisioned the new DC before having set up bind properly (I forgot to "yum install bind bind-util bind-libs") before hand. The provision worked okay, except that it told me

G'day All, We are trying to set up SCCM-5.0. Our AD test is Samba-4.8.5. SCCM requires schema changes, and Samba is rejecting these. Anyone tackled this? Ideas on how to proceed? The output thrown by the SCCM exe (extadsch.exe) is: Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager v5.00 (Build 8634) Copyright (C) 2011 Microsoft Corp. Failed to extend the Active Directory schema. Your

On 3/25/2018 8:54 PM, David Minard wrote: > > > On 24/03/18 01:35, lingpanda101 wrote: >> On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: >>> G'day All, >>> >>>     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all >>> together. >>> >>> On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >>>> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David

On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > >     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all > together. > > On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >>> Thanks Carlos, >>> >>> The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is >>>

On 24/03/18 01:35, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: >> G'day All, >> >>     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all >> together. >> >> On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >>> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >>>> Thanks Carlos, >>>>

G'day All, Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all together. On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >> Thanks Carlos, >> >> The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is >> the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only >> updated the OS.

G'day All, I have 4 DCs on Centos 7.1. Everything was working really well for years, including replication. Then I decided that the OS needed updating. Did the yum update on one of the DCs, rebooted. That server is now running Centos 7.4. Samba seemed to start okay. However, samba-tool drs showrepl gives this error on all 3 of the other DCs, and shows success on the updated DC.

Thanks Carlos, The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have same problem after update for samba. > I allow new ports in firewall. > >

The RootDNSServers zone is special in a number of ways. It has no SOA record for instance, and so there's a lot of special casing around it. Looking on a Windows DC, dnscmd /enumzones lists dot as a zone and dnscmd /enumrecords . returns the root servers (as well as ..RootHints it seems). None of this is our choice of convention unfortunately, but it should be fairly simple to make the client

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:45:39 +1200 Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > It looks like the original intention in our code was to be able to > add/modify records with the "." zone. Trying it, there seems to be > other issues with using it. I'm not entirely sure if this alias is > valid against Windows or for which calls. The zone is definitely called

On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: > Thanks Carlos, > > The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > > >> On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have same problem

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:45:39 +1200 > Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > > > It looks like the original intention in our code was to be able to > > add/modify records with the "." zone. Trying it, there seems to be > > other issues with using

Hai, Very important things are missing here in this one.. smb.conf Samba from sources or os provided? In case of last, centos 7.1 to 7.4 is samba 4.1.12 to 4.6.2 https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 Various packages have been rebased. Some of those are openLDAP, samba, .... And yes, as Carlos suggested, do check your firewalling also. Maybe samba didnt change but

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:26:33 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:12:11 +0200 > Torsten Kurbad via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:23:24 +0100 > > schrieb Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > > > > > On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:06:42 +0200 > > > Marcel

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:19:21 +1000 > Amitay Isaacs via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Let me try to clear some confusion. > > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Torsten Kurbad via samba < > > samba at

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:19:21 +1000 Amitay Isaacs via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Let me try to clear some confusion. > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Torsten Kurbad via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Samba's bind-dlz module does not export root hints to BIND named. So > the error you are seeing is an issue with your