similar to: Internal DNS listen address

Hello On 07.10.15 23:35, John Gardeniers wrote: > Is it possible to have Samba4 internal DNS listen only on specific IP > address(es)? We have 2 IP addresses on our DC and don't want the > Samba4 DNS listening on one of them as it is to be used for an > independent BIND DNS service. For those who may be wondering why, it's > because Samba4's DNS doesn't do

Samba 4.1.16, Centos 6.6 x86-64, BIND_DLZ 9.9. I have three AD DC's that were functioning normally. However, today I restarted BIND on one node, and it failed to start with this message in the log (names changed): May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com May

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

The 2 errors: pam_setcred: error Permission denied Cannot delete credentials[7]: Permission denied Looks to be a major bug in the PAM module for Solaris-2.8/2.7/2.6. Has anyone from the list (developers of OpenSSH, endusers, hackers, etc.) came up w/ a solution? Even a temporary one? When authenticating yourself on the same system that worked, but when authenticating to another system failed. I

I have applied the changes as suggested. After restarting the server, smbclient-command worked! But after I restarted the Samba Client with „/etc/init.d/samba restart“ I was once again confronted with the same problem! Again, only another server restart did the trick. Now I am facing this problem constantly. As soon as I restart, this command among others won’t work without displaying an error

Hi Rowland, Would you care to elaborate on that last sentence? I've not seen that mentioned before and I'm very curios about your reasons for saying it, especially as we're using internal DNS for our two DCs. regards, John On 29/02/16 06:18, Rowland penny wrote: > On 28/02/16 18:30, Felipe_G0NZÁLEZ_SANTIAG0 wrote: >> Hello list, I need to know which DNS backend is using

hi, I seek to be able itself to wish a desire box our listeners am to music, over ices am played have someone a recommendation for me? can be gladly with mysql. greeting -- Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen Carsten Henkel mailto:carsten@chatlabel.de In unserer Firma ist alles elektrisch - sogar das Gehalt versetzt einem einen Schlag. dieser Text ist zuf?llig gew?hlt und

I installed 7.1 with the command line values biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0 thinking this would result in ifcfg-eth0 being the file to use... The system still created an ifcfg-eno1 file and that was what is being used for network config information. I remove the ifcfg-eno1 and rebooted - got no network. I then copied back the ifcfg-eth0 to ifcfg-en01 and changed the device name in the file and

We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with internal DNS and I can't find the DNS logs. Where does the Samba 4 internal DNS log queries? Thanks. regards, John

On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or > was this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get logged > at all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to locate such > logs. > > On 28/10/15 14:28, John Gardeniers wrote: >> We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with

Has anyone here managed to get sudo working with Samba 4 AD users, using either ldap or sssd, with sssd preferred? If so, can you please point me in the direction of whatever instructions you used? It seems like there are a bunch of tutorials on the subject, each with different, and sometimes conflicting, information but none of those I've tried work for me. regards, John

Hi Rowland, I Upgraded from Samba 4.4.2 and we have tried the FQDN without success. regards, John On 21/11/16 08:02, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:42:30 +1100 > John Gardeniers via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi Louis, >> >> While it wasn't spelled out, it was firmly implied in my previous >> message that

no DNS server on that planet logs normal queries just because there si not enough disk space in most setups, there is not benefit log anything except erros and warnings for normal operations what is the problem you like to solve and if there is no problem why do you want logging normal operations? in other words: what do you try to solve except https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS Am

Hi Rowland, Perhaps I misled you with my wording. Each user has just one email address, which was not migrated across. From where I'm sitting that looks like a very serious bug. regards, John On 31/08/15 19:07, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 31/08/15 07:27, John Gardeniers wrote: >> I've been running through a bunch of tests after migrating from >> Samba > 3 to Samba 4

On 07.10.15 20:07, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 09:14 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: >> If I setup a samba 4 PDC (not AD) like I do with samba 3, I still >> have >> to change the follow registry key on Win 7/8/?/10 for join it to >> samba >> domain ? >> >>> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorksta >>>

Probably a ld issue. It might have not run in the rpm's post script. Do a ldd /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbregistry-samba4.so /usr/lib64/samba/vfs/acl_xattr.so and check if either are reporting missing dependencies. Em 07/02/2017 21:25, John Gardeniers via samba escreveu: > This is really weird. The error below occurred for about 10 minutes after the > post-update reboot and then went

Hi Klaus, I haven't used that tool for at least 13 years but I do recall that, among other things, it read from the registry. Coupled with the fact that Samba 4 AD is not a complete implementation of AD I can't imagine that it could possibly work. More to the point, I'd be seriously concerned about the results. This is not something I'm prepared to test in a production

I've compiled the latest version of samba (1.9.18p4) and set up password encryption (per instructions in the ENCRYPTIONS.txt file). Setting root's smbpasswd worked with no problems. I set another user (me) with an smbpasswd. Tried "smbclient -L '\\hostname\wwinzer'". The output is the following: 68 wwinzer@Sun-E3000:~ ==> smbclient '\\champusa.com\wwinzer'

Hi Rowland, Thanks for the suggestion. So far, since adding 'ntlm auth' to smb.conf on the DCs we are no longer having this problem. Only time will tell if it stays working but at least I'm no longer getting complaints from the users. regards, John On 21/11/16 10:00, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:31:28 +1100 > John Gardeniers via samba <samba

Hi Volker, Thanks for the response. The clients are Win 7, Win 10 and various flavours of Linux, with Samba client versions ranging from 3.6 to 4.5.3. There is no perceptible difference between any of them. Network latency is never above 0.2s and mostly sits at around 0.1s. If that's a problem it is so only for Samba. I did as you suggested with the smb options but that just made it