similar to: Permissions for Group Shares

Hi, How many user's you have assigned on that directory? --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, muiz <muiz at 163.com> wrote: > Hi, James, > The file system is xfs (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs 1891292900 > 1556745108 334547792 83% /home) > > > Thanks and best regards, > Muiz > > At 2015-03-23 19:36:02, "James

> > On the file serever: > > Collected config --- 2019-07-03-10:27 ----------- > > > > Hostname: srv > > DNS Domain: a.b.hu > > FQDN: srv.a.b.hu > > ipaddress: 10.0.3.15 192.168.0.8 > > ----------- > > Samba is running as a Unix domain member > > ----------- > > > > This computer is running Debian 10.0 x86_64 > >

muiz wrote: > Dear all, > > > I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. > There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? > > > [root at s1 abc]# getfacl /abc > # file: abc > # owner: root > # group: root > user::rwx > user:user01:--- >

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>

*Another reply that was accidentally sent to the wrong address...* I ran another test of a share on the raid array after making the changes you suggested Rowland. I reset the ACLs on /mnt/md0/samba_shares/test as outlined in the wiki and set the default group to domain admins. I executed setfacl commands g=rwx and chgrp domain admins, then added the directory to my smb.conf and ran

Mediawiki is throwing an error at this moment but I followed that page when I set up the shares and triple checked everything when I last reset ACLs. JS On Sep 23, 2016 2:51 AM, "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:23:05 -0400 > Jason Secord via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > *Another reply that

Pisch Tam?s <pischta at gmail.com> ezt ?rta (id?pont: 2019. j?l. 4., Cs, 13:15): > > >OK, I set up Buster RC3 in a VM > Thanks a lot! > > >I could add 'Domain Admins' to the 'Properties' on the share without any > >problem. > :o > > > Back to Buster machine: > > root at dbrc3:~# ls -lad /home/users > > drwxrwx---+ 2 root

Hi Rowland, >From the top down, I'm going to try and cover every step involved in the wiki and give you as much info as I can in the hope that we can get this issue resolved, or at least determine that there is nothing wrong with my config and that the underlying array has to be the weak point, even if none of us know why. *Step 1: Filesystem support* We need the filesystem to support

On 19/12/14 01:33, Rich Webb wrote: > Please is there anyone who has an answer on why this might be happening? > Do I need some sort of sssd support or winbind or something? In the > wiki about setting up acl's it doesn't say anything about any other > requirements, only that you have to have acl support and xattr support > in your filesystem which I do. > > I'm

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:25:32 +0200 > Neil <nwilson123 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Rowland, > > > > Thank you for the reply and info. > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> > > wrote: > > >

Hi list, I am running Samba in a 2-DC, 1-Member setup, all on Debian Bookworm, version 4.17.12. I have the member server sharing shares to many users, and it's all working except one folder. Here is the member smb.conf (name sanitized): [global] bind interfaces only = Yes client signing = required disable netbios = Yes interfaces = lo enp1s0 log file

Hi all, Sorry to repost about this same issue once again, but I'm really at a complete loss as to how to solve the problem with ownership being changed after I've set it. I've set ownership as follows... ( set this by chmod -R 0770 HR, as well as chgroup -R HR-Group, I then signed into a Windows PC that was part of the domain, went to computer management as per the WIKI and chose

> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:42:57 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Yes thats correct. >> But try the following. >> Make sure you use the usermapping. >> >> username map = /etc/samba/samba_usermapping >> containing: >> !root = NTDOM\Administrator NTDOM\administrator

Hello, we are using the vfs module recycle with the following config: vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = .Papierkorb recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:subdir_mode = 0777 recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes Problem is that everybody can see deleted documents in the recycle bin. But if I set

Yes, LAN is the workgroup name. I made a test, i removed all the ACL with setfacl -b mysharename [root at fileserv]# getfacl share/ # file: share/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::rwx other::--- Going to Windows side and Added "Domain Admins" in permission tab to read/modify/total Security Tab is denied even for my others account in domain Admins group looking again

Hi I'm trying to make a share called dropbox rw for members of a group. /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf [global] server role = domain controller workgroup = CACTUS realm = hh3.site netbios name = HH3 passdb backend = samba4 template shell = /bin/bash [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/hh3.site/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path =

On 2019-02-19 3:47 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:25:51 -0500 >> What exactly does "START AGAIN" imply? Just chmod? > > 'ls' shows the correct ownership and Unix permissions: > > drwxrwx---+ 4 root domain admins 4096 Feb 17 19:13 programs > > But 'getfacl' show something different: > > getfacl:

CentOS 8 Samba Version 4.12.5 compiled from source configured as DC and joined to domain SAMDOM.EXAMPLE.COM. smb.conf -- # Global parameters [global] netbios name = B10 realm = SAMDOM.EXAMPLE.COM server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = SAMDOM interfaces = lo,enp15s0 bind interfaces only = Yes dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8

Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

> It's needed after every GPO addition and edit. There must be a root > cause to hunt down somewhere. Or is it a bug in 4.13.0 ? Yes, and no. Yes, its a bug. No, in my opionion its an old setting thats just needs some updating. Try this. samba-tool ntacl set "O:LAG:BAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;BA)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;SO)(A;OICI;0x001f01