similar to: 4th DC Unable to Replicate - WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED

Hi , Thank you for your input. I have had tried all of the escape characters you have have tested with but I have had no luck with them. I am curious to know which versions of net have you been tested with? I do agree that the best practice for this is to remove "-" from the beginning of the object name, However, seeing that it can be created that way allowed, I would like to find a

G'day All, I have 4 DCs on Centos 7.1. Everything was working really well for years, including replication. Then I decided that the OS needed updating. Did the yum update on one of the DCs, rebooted. That server is now running Centos 7.4. Samba seemed to start okay. However, samba-tool drs showrepl gives this error on all 3 of the other DCs, and shows success on the updated DC.

On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > >     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all > together. > > On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >>> Thanks Carlos, >>> >>> The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is >>>

On 3/25/2018 8:54 PM, David Minard wrote: > > > On 24/03/18 01:35, lingpanda101 wrote: >> On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: >>> G'day All, >>> >>>     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all >>> together. >>> >>> On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >>>> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David

On 24/03/18 01:35, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: >> G'day All, >> >>     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all >> together. >> >> On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >>> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >>>> Thanks Carlos, >>>>

G'day All, Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all together. On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >> Thanks Carlos, >> >> The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is >> the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only >> updated the OS.

Thanks Carlos, The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have same problem after update for samba. > I allow new ports in firewall. > >

On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: > Thanks Carlos, > > The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > > >> On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have same problem

Hai, Very important things are missing here in this one.. smb.conf Samba from sources or os provided? In case of last, centos 7.1 to 7.4 is samba 4.1.12 to 4.6.2 https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 Various packages have been rebased. Some of those are openLDAP, samba, .... And yes, as Carlos suggested, do check your firewalling also. Maybe samba didnt change but

G'day Guys, Sorry for the delay. I've had the log level of samba at 5 for a while now. Nothing interesting seems to be coming from the samba log. Increasing the bind logs, to level 5, shows nothing different. I get the same two warnings: 09-Oct-2015 12:46:01.421 database: warning: samba_dlz: Ignoring duplicate zone 'samba4.scem.westernsydney.edu.au' from

On 27/10/15 03:57, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > > I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no > changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC > join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. > "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. > > See below for named.conf.

On 27/10/15 03:57, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > > I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no > changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC > join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. > "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. > > See below for named.conf.

G'day All, I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. See below for named.conf. I'm having two issues. 1) After bind first starts up

G'day All, We are trying to set up SCCM-5.0. Our AD test is Samba-4.8.5. SCCM requires schema changes, and Samba is rejecting these. Anyone tackled this? Ideas on how to proceed? The output thrown by the SCCM exe (extadsch.exe) is: Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager v5.00 (Build 8634) Copyright (C) 2011 Microsoft Corp. Failed to extend the Active Directory schema. Your

Thanks for the reply, Does this means in RHEL5.3 with samba version 3.0.x doesn't support trusted domain samba share access. On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:33 PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:32:07 +0530 > Anoop T S via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Samba share access is not working for trusted domain

Samba share access is not working for trusted domain users. I have updated krb5.conf with both domains realm and in smb.conf trusted domains default value not changed. But still share access is not working for trusted domain. # less lnxbrisglog01.02188394-667794/installed-rpms | grep samba samba-3.0.33-3.40.el5_10-x86_64 Tue 29 Sep 2015 03:25:42 PM AEST samba-common-3.0.33-3.40.el5_10-x86_64 Tue

Hello I'm new to R (one week) so please excuse any obvious mistakes in my code or posting. I am attempting to fit a non linear function defining the relationship between dependent variable A and the variables PAR and T grouped by the condition Di. The following steps are taken in the Rcode below: 1) load the data (not shown) 2) define the function to be fit 3) define the starting values

Times from seq.POSIXt come out wrong in AEST timezone around Feb 29 every leap year before 1970 (on Windows XP). According to help(DateTimeClasses), this is handled by "our own C code". > x <- as.POSIXct("1968-02-27") # tz="AEST" > x.gmt <- as.POSIXct("1968-02-27", tz="GMT") > data.frame( GMT=seq(x.gmt, by="day",

On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 21:41 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > Non-GPT partitions do not have a UUID. The _content_ (filesystem, > LVM physical volume, non-encrypted swap space, etc.) of such a > partition could have a UUID, but the partition itself does not. ON Centos 5, using GPARTED I created partitions for filing systems ext3 and ext4. 4 primary and unlimited (except by space) extended

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Always Learning wrote: > ON Centos 5, using GPARTED I created partitions for filing systems ext3 > and ext4. 4 primary and unlimited (except by space) extended partitions. > That suggests those partitions are not GPT but old fashioned M$DOS If it is old fashioned MSDOS, you can have four total primary and extended, not four primary plus extended. An extended