similar to: Bind flat file support

Hi Robert, It doesn't break compatibility with MS, unless you're talking about the RSAT DNS tool, which is a lot more cumbersome than a text editor anyway and it's pretty much assumed that if you're using Samba you're a Linux sysadmin, so not being able to use the RSAT DNS tool should not be a problem. I haven't read Mark Andrew's comment, not being on the Bind

On 09/07/2015 06:02 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Is there any chance that support for Bind flat files will return? I > understand the various (extremely weak) arguments against it but DLZ > not only sucks big time, it limits proper functionality and > inter-operability, necessitating significant design changes for > anything but the simplest of networks. Additionally, it

I thought about this overnight... On 09/07/2015 07:41 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Hi Robert, > > It doesn't break compatibility with MS, unless you're talking about > the RSAT DNS tool, which is a lot more cumbersome than a text editor > anyway and it's pretty much assumed that if you're using Samba you're > a Linux sysadmin, so not being able to use the

So if this is done, is edns configure also ? ? in resolv.conf add: options edns0 ? and, name.conf test these. ? ??????? //?The forwarded zone to the AD-DC DNS use these also. ????????//dnssec-must-be-secure?internal.domain.tld no; ????????//dnssec-must-be-secure 168.192.in-addr.arpa no; ????????// listen-on-v6 { ::1; };? // test what works best, if not all?ipv6 is disabled also?enable this

Hi Brady, I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that everything else is working, or the file was not included in the package. regards, John On 21/08/15 10:16, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 11:18, John Gardeniers wrote:

On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 12:52, John Gardeniers wrote: >> Hi Brady, >> >> I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my >> newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when >> installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that >> everything else is working, or the file

I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I come across the following: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now as dates on this bug are 2 years old?

Hello, I have try to add a new DNS Server to a existing Samba AD with bind DLZ. I have try https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration#Adding_new_records A New NS Record is add, on the old DNS dig show the new NS entry but that is not shown on the backup dns. The backup DNS is youn to domain. samba-tool drs showrepl looks good Is there a command to join a new dns server to the samba ad?

Hi Robert, yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer TTL values. Regards, - lars. Am 07.09.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: > > > On 09/07/2015 12:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration >> >> I am using

On 07/09/15 21:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Is there some option on the slave to set the frequency of the AXFR? > Say every hour? > > On 09/07/2015 03:45 PM, Lars Hanke wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when >> the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer >> TTL values.

2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". >> > > No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to > contact for the domain records. > Rowland... thank you again Captain Obvious. Yes SOA means

Hello John, Am 04.11.2015 um 22:13 schrieb John Gardeniers: > Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or was > this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get logged at > all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to locate such logs. Samba doesn't log DNS queries. Patches are welcome. :-) Regards, Marc

On the Samba wiki at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Internal_DNS there is the following: If you have chosen the internal DNS as backend for your environment, there are only two options that can be added to your smb.conf, to control the behaviour of DNS at this point: # Don't allow any updates | allow unsigned updates | only allow signed updates allow dns updates = False |

On 04/11/15 22:02, John Gardeniers wrote: > Thanks Marc, > > That's a nice unambiguous answer, so I'll stop looking. > > I really doubt I'll be doing any coding on Samba, so it's kind of > unlikely I'll be supplying a patch. If I did create a patch it would > be to return to BIND flat files, so that the DNS can be made fully > functional again. >

SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". Using Bind-DLZ all DNS servers can modify the AD zones, they all reply "I am the SOA" when you ask them about SOA for AD zones. Using Internal DNS I expect all DNS servers can modify the AD zones also (that's internal stuff) but even if they can modify the AD zone locally that's is not the process chosen by Samba

Thanks Rowland, I have removed from options, and amended the forwarders. [global] workgroup = <MYDOMAIN> realm = <MYDOMAIN>.CORP netbios name = <HOSTNAME> server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 ----------> If I remove the portion I get errors -> idmap

ah yes.. that are the "limitation", but know limitations ( for us ) Rowland, this is something to add on the wiki. (here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration ) ;-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Yuriy Tabolin >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus 2015 11:35 >Aan: samba at

oki doki. Thank you for precision. That kind of limitation should be added to the wiki as I would have already tried to move Bind to a non-DC host if I was able to find to to do that. And if I thought about that, some have thought about that before me. With easy virtualisation as we have now, with the idea to separate task one different systems to lower risk endured by each system, it seems to me

Dear R-devel list members, Probably not an opportune time for this, given the immanent release of 2.0.0, but I was just reminded (while preparing a lecture) of a function that I find useful and that I though might be a candidate for the utils package: The function, which I call some(), behaves like head() and tail(), from which it is adapted, except that it samples from an object (e.g., rows of a

On 2015-08-21 16:30, John Gardeniers wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I wonder if I'm missing the file because I only did a classicupgrade, > rather than a provision and perhaps then the file(s) is/are not > created. > > regards, > John > > > On 21/08/15 13:45, Brady, Mike wrote: >> On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: >>> On 2015-08-21 12:52, John