similar to: samba_dlz: Failed to connect

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches similar to: "samba_dlz: Failed to connect"

2015 Sep 03
2
dhcp errors - Re: dhcp example
First I am having a couple challenges with your script here: On 09/03/2015 02:43 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > > I thought that might be your next question, I wrote it, based on what > I found here: > > http://blog.michael.kuron-germany.de/2011/02/isc-dhcpd-dynamic-dns-updates-against-secure-microsoft-dns/ > > > #!/bin/bash > > # /usr/local/sbin/dhcp-dyndns.sh > #
2015 Sep 04
1
further testing - Re: dhcp errors - Re: dhcp example
This will be it for tonight... Sep 3 20:35:30 homebase dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 02:97:09:02:23:a2 (cubieboard2) via eth0 Sep 3 20:35:31 homebase dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.192.21 to 02:97:09:02:23:a2 (cubieboard2) via eth0 Sep 3 20:35:31 homebase dhcpd: /usr/local/sbin/dhcp-dyndns.sh: line 17: /var/log/dyndns.log: Permission denied Sep 3 20:35:31 homebase dhcpd:
2015 Sep 03
0
dhcp example
On 03/09/15 19:28, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 02:17 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 03/09/15 19:05, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> Anyway, next to DHCP... >>> >>> I have installed it. But need to config. Rowland, can you send me >>> your sample config you mentioned? >>> >>> >>> >>
2015 Sep 04
0
dhcp errors - Re: dhcp example
I am reading through the script and see some things I did not change... Will do that and try again. As well as create the log file manually. On 09/03/2015 07:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > First I am having a couple challenges with your script here: > > On 09/03/2015 02:43 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> >> I thought that might be your next question, I wrote it, based on what
2017 Oct 07
2
bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates Error
Hello Rolawnd, I followed the wikipage exactly. Bind9 is installed on the Samba DC. The Linux-Client should be a member of the Active Directory-domain? Regards ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Para: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Enviados: Sábado, 7 de Octubre 2017 13:29:43 Asunto: Re: [Samba] bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for
2019 Jan 10
1
samba_dnsupdate options: --use-samba-tool vs. --use-nsupdate, and dhcpd dynamic updates
PRIOR THREAD: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-January/220292.html In the  referenced prior thread, I had an issue of samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names causing a dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable error. Ultimately, the solution kindly provided by Rowland was to insert dns update command = /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool into the [global] section of
2015 Nov 09
3
Samba_dlz: canceling trasaction on zone domain
Hey Rowland, Below is a cutdown version of my DHCP. As you can see, I haven't really set anything up for ddns-update. While using Samba4's internal DNS I had the setting 'ddns-update-style interim;' and it seemed to have worked fine. But with bind I'm not sure what else is needed. Thanks for taking a look at it. Philip # # DHCP Server Configuration file. # see
2016 Dec 26
5
DDNS with Bind
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I try to set up a ADDC with bind9 and dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates. I followd the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_wi th_BIND9 My problem is, that the PTR Record will not be updated, because the script is using the wrong reverse-zone: - --------------------- Dez 26 17:30:05 addc-01 named[512]:
2017 Oct 07
2
bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates Error
This is my named.conf options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; notify no; empty-zones-enable no; auth-nxdomain yes; listen-on-v6 { none; }; forwarders { 192.168.10.3; 10.0.0.3; }; allow-query { 127.0.0.1/32; 192.168.16.0/24; }; allow-recursion { 127.0.0.1/32;
2017 Apr 25
2
Setup a new samba AD DC
Il giorno mar, 25/04/2017 alle 14.36 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > However I would like to enable also the DHCP service, and think > > it's right to activate it on this server. > > > > What is the best way to do so? > > Well you could always do it the way I have been doing it for the last > 5 years, see here: > >