similar to: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists"

2015 Sep 03
3
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and > usually So if I put the Samba AD DC in, say, "addc.example.com," "addc.example.com" must be the Kerberos default_realm? > the samba DNS server (internal or bind) is just the dns >
2015 Sep 03
4
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 > > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [snip] > >> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and > >> usually > > So if
2015 Sep 03
0
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
Jim, It wasn't an implication that Samba4 would crash your server, rather it was a question of what happens *if* that box fails (power supply, memory, cpu, disk controller, etc. I've seen 'em all)? Consider this. I had one site with a Microsoft DC providing DHCP to it's clients and shared folders. When that DC failed due to disk controller, it stopped issuing DHCP leases.
2015 Sep 08
2
Samba AD DC, DHCP & Address Assignments
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:19:22 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 09/08/2015 09:04 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: > [snip] > > > > And the zone file on deepthought might read something like... > > > > somepc IN A 192.168.0.10 [snip] > > Problem with the AD DC is that it lives in a sub-domain, > >
2015 Sep 03
3
samba_dlz: Failed to connect
Progress on dns_dlz. At least I got things loading. If I don't include the dlz info bind starts, but if I do I get: Sep 03 13:31:57 homebase.home.htt named[21920]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Sep 03 13:31:58 homebase.home.htt named[21920]: samba_dlz: Failed to connect to /var/lib/samba/private/dns/sam.ldb permissions seem right: # ls -ls
2015 Sep 08
4
Samba AD DC, DHCP & Address Assignments
Hi All, I should have considered this beforehand... Assumed the info would be in the Wiki somewhere. Cannot find. The way our LAN has been working is clients use DHCP, but all address assignments are static. Thus, when a given PC asks "what's my address?", the DHCP server looks at the MAC address and asks the configured resolver what is the IP address for the hostname for that
2016 Jul 26
6
NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only?
Hi There, Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. Thanks! Here's what we have: Ubuntu Linux 14.04.4 LTS Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu Using OpenLDAP for authentication Using nscd to speed things up *Not* running winbind *Not* running Kerberos The problem is the company purchased a product that, *despite* the vendor being told "We don't have
2015 Aug 31
4
Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On (was: re: Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ)
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:39 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 08/27/2015 08:45 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 > > Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > >> Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided > >> one... [snip] > > >
2013 Jun 06
6
Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650?
Hi There, We have this rather large-ish floor-standing Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650. I tried using both the "bestups" and "blazer_ser" drivers with it, but no go. So before I go any further: *Should* one of these work with it and, if not, do I have any options? (E.g.: Modify a current driver, resuscitate one that was started and abandoned, etc.? I can code.) My test
2015 Sep 03
0
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
On 03/09/15 14:28, Jim Seymour wrote: > Hi All, > > Finally got BIND_DLZ going. Last errors were: > > samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone 'example.com' > loading configuration: already exists > exiting (due to fatal error) > samba_dlz: shutting down > > And, indeed, I had, in /etc/bind/named.local.conf: > > zone
2015 Sep 03
0
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > [snip] >> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and >> usually > So if I put the Samba AD DC in, say, "addc.example.com," > "addc.example.com" must be the Kerberos default_realm? Yes
2017 Dec 04
4
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
I have setup on Fedora 27 server a AD-DC samba server + bind + dhcp. All seem work fine: I can join to domain, add/remove dns records with samba-tools, access to shared folder, use MS Management Console on Win7, ecc But when I join a new machine Samba winbind Member server to domain [ root at server-dati ~]# net ads join DOGMA-TO -U administrator Using short domain name --
2016 Jul 26
2
NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only?
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:09:10 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 26/07/16 15:31, Jim Seymour wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. > > Thanks! > > Why didn't Samba AD work, what problems did you have, it might be > easier to fix them. It's a long and ugly story, which
2016 Jul 26
2
NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only?
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:40:47 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: [snip] > > I remember it now, it started last September ( see here: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-September/194047.html) and > it could have been the longest running thread on here and you still > couldn't get it to work. More accurately: Couldn't get it to work the way
2020 Apr 30
7
bind9 refuses to start -> zone has no NS records
Hi, I have to add a second DC to a Zone. I use the sernet packages Version 4.11 on a debian 10 host. The bind refuses to start: root at addc-zone02:~# systemctl status bind9 ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-04-30 14:51:58 EEST; 5s ago Docs:
2015 Sep 08
3
Samba AD DC, DHCP & Address Assignments
NOTE: Please honour the "Reply-To" and do not "Reply-All". I'm reading the mailing list. I wouldn't be posting to it if I was not and I don't need two copies. Thanks! On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:32:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > [snip] > > Oops. I missed that you had missed this! When you said flat zone > file, I took
2017 Dec 04
3
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 12.07 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Is the DHCP server updating the records for you ? Yes, but for now the problem is not dhcp (see follow) > If so, you need to stop the windows clients trying to update their > own records, they don't own them. I have the problem when join to domani via samba on another server, or when I run
2017 Dec 04
2
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 11.29 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Try changing the 'options' of named.conf to this: Thanks Rowland Integrated your suggested changes and restart samba and named Now my named.conf is this[1], but none is change: [ root at server-addc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names --fail-immediately update failed: REFUSED dic 04
2012 Jan 07
3
[Samba4] samba_dlz problem "loading configuration: already exists"
Hi, I'm new to this list and Samba4, so may be this is a stupid question. I've installed samba4 (4.0.0alpha18-GIT-7b42ceb) on a server in my home LAN and have a problem with samba_dlz and bind (9.8.1-P1). In the zone definition file for my LAN domain, I had configured the IP addresses for several host names (e.g. printer, ...) with "A" records. This worked perfectly fine in
2020 Apr 30
3
bind9 refuses to start -> zone has no NS records
Thanks for the tip. I have still "zone has no NS records" This is the output (anonymized) of the script -- sorry, I will post it directly next time ;) Collected config? --- 2020-04-30-15:25 ----------- Hostname: addc-jor02 DNS Domain: example.com FQDN: addc-jor02.example.com ipaddress: 192.168.40.24 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com record verified ok, sample