similar to: BIND 9.9 apparmor rules with Samba

Hai, You posted the correct things here, for a quick fix i I'm buzzy with something else atm but i saw that /dev/urandom part. Add in the bind9 (named) apparmor profile # Samba DLZ /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/bind9/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/gensec/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/samba/ldb/*.so rm, /{usr/,}lib/@{multiarch}/ldb/modules/ldb/*.so rm,

Ah, ok, my thats where its different here. My setup is AD-DNS => eth0 Server_split_DNS (Proxy) eth1 => internet > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Joachim Lindenberg [mailto:samba at lindenberg.one] > Verzonden: dinsdag 30 juli 2019 10:44 > Aan: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] split horizon and authoritative answers..?

Hi All, Through interpreting what the current Wiki article says, plus some trial and error: The following AppArmor rules *appear* to work for a Samba AD DC using the stuff from the distro for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: $ cat /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named # Site-specific additions and overrides for usr.sbin.named. # For more details, please see /etc/apparmor.d/local/README. /dev/urandom w,

On 01/08/16 17:48, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > I just installed ubuntu-16.04 and followed the instructions I found for it. > problems I ran into that way > I removed apparmer and I had to use bindflatfile as dlz was not working for > me > I got my machine connected. I'll figure out fedora later. > I would figure out why dlz doesn't work first, why didn't it work ? what

Hi, I ran into some trouble last night when setting up samba (4.1.5) with bind 9.9 as the backend. I followed the instructions on the wiki but found that the apparmor settings that are suggested don't actually work (at least for me running Ubuntu 13.10). Just putting it here for others that may experience the same issue and to check that I haven't done something silly. If what I've

Hi, We have some issue with the reverse DNS in Samba AD. We're running Bind9_DLZ on Ubuntu 18.04. The DHCP server(Ubuntu 16.04) is different to the AD server and not in the same AD domain. The DHCP scope points to the Samba AD server as the DNS server When a machine with DHCP assigned address tries to update the DNS record, it is able to update the forward zone but not the reverse zone. The

> > > > *named.conf.options* > > > > options { > > > > directory "/var/cache/bind"; > > > > > > > > // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want > > > > // to talk to, you may need to fix the firewall to allow > > multiple > > > > // ports to talk.

On 11/28/2017 9:02 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:37:22 -0600 > Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> On 11/28/2017 2:38 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:53:32 -0600 >>> Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Last week,

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > See inline comments > And Please keep replies to the list > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:08:26 -0600 > Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Samba's wiki didn't have a walk through working example from A to Z. > > It is great don't get me wrong but I

Hai, @Rowland. Yes yes, you did say you hate systemd. :-) I had a hard(er)time on this one also but i got passed it. ;-) But you and everybody else on the list, please review this setup. And a very big thank you Rowland for the start of it. This should be a good base to start with as howto for ubuntu 18.04 systemd based. Any suggestion additions please add them, below is also the order

On 11/28/2017 11:11 AM, Robert Wooden wrote: > Dale, > > Been using Ubuntu server for years in my AD. Discovered a long time > ago that apparmor is not needed for a server. (Someone is probably > going to argue the other that is should be but . . .) > > Do not quote me but, I have read that AppArmor is intended more for a > desktop environment. I have always disabled and

On 11/28/2017 2:38 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:53:32 -0600 > Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of >> dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because >> systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - >>

Hi Louis, Thank you for that I have made the changes as per below , some items might have duplicated. I then reload apparmor restarted the samba-ad-dc and bind9 services and get the same issue. Every time the forward DNS update works but the reverse doesn't I found a really interesting samba post going back 2017 re the DHCP and DNS

Hai,  Normaly i kick in sooner but im in bed fit by flu. :-(  You have to add the bind paths to the apparmor profile, or disable apparmor in total, just dont remove it, should work also. debian wiki or ubuntu wiki shows how.  But why are you using buster, imo really not safe,  if you wany a 4.7 for stretch use my apt. When im better i can have a look into your problem more closely. greetz

Hai, Ok, below looks ok, as Rowland also said. But i have one more thing. > > ?????? Checking file: /etc/krb5.conf > > > > [libdefaults] > > ??? dns_lookup_realm = false > > ??? dns_lookup_kdc = true > > ??? default_realm = EDM-INC.COM > > ??? default_tgs_enctypes = arcfour-hmac-md5 des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 > > ??? default_tkt_enctypes =

> From: Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Date: 05/14/2019 02:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Workstations cannot update DNS > Sent by: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > On 14/05/2019 21:36, Durwin via samba wrote: > > I am trying to get DDNS working, so workstations can update their ip.

> > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_AppArmor_and_SELinux_Integration > > > > selinux is not installed. > > Firewall is not active. > > iptables is not active. > The problem appears to have something to do with Apparmor. > > > > From that page, > > BIND process has read access to the following files > >

Hello dear Samba Group i try to install from repository Samba 4.10 on Ubuntu 19.04 - 64b with local BIND-9.11 Server. Lookop and Revers runnig .... after re-run Bind appair the following Error. /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_11.so failed to map segment from shared object "named[7726]: dlz_dlopen failed to open library

Hi Rowland, I get the same error messages even with the following smb.conf, generated by the migration process. [global] workgroup = LIN realm = LIN.COM netbios name = LINSERVER01 server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate idmap_ldb:use

When I run: # samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ I get the following: lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf" Reading domain information lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf" DNS