similar to: Samba4.2.3 Authentication

On the "guest share" try it with : map to guest = Bad Password Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Nitin Pande > Verzonden: woensdag 2 september 2015 9:57 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba4.2.3 Authentication > > Hello, > > Need your guidance in setting

G'day All, I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. See below for named.conf. I'm having two issues. 1) After bind first starts up

Hi, Currently, the "base" has colSums, colMeans. It seems that it would be useful to extend this to also include colMin, colMax (of course, rowMin and rowMax, as well) in order to facilitate faster computations for large vectors (compared to using apply). Has this been considered before? Please forgive me if this has already been discussed before. Thanks, Ravi Ravi Varadhan, Ph.D.

Thanks! That does exactly what I wanted. Although contrary to what the documentation says, it seems it doesn't do anything unless I explicitly configure worm:grace_period.

I'm not sure if this is a bug, or if I'm doing something wrong. =20 =46rom the worms dataframe, which is at in a file called worms.txt at =20 http://www.imperial.ac.uk/bio/research/crawley/therbook <http://www.imperial.ac.uk/bio/research/mjcraw/therbook/index.htm>=20 =20 the idea is to extract a subset of the rows, sorted in declining order of worm density, with only the maximum

-=> To moderator: I don't know whether it's wise to release the FTP-location I would recommend everyone to just look over their daemons, and run something like nessus against theirselves... Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:26:59 -0700 From: "Ben Cantrick (Macky Stingray)" <mackys@MACKY.RONIN.NET> To:

Hi Developers, I am looking for another new project to help me get more up to speed on R and to learn something outside of R internals. One recent R issue I have run into is finding a fast implementations of the equivalent to the following SAS code: /* MDPC is an integer sort key made from two integer columns */ MDPC = (MD * 100000) + PCO; /* sort the dataset by the key */ PROC SORT;

I have setup my application so that the "admin" area is a module (app/worm/ -> admin area) and the "site" area is in the app/ folder. When I try to submit a basic form to the database it says: This error occured while loading the following files: worm/in_your_classroom_link.rb Which I think this means is that it is looking for a worm module in my models folder. Why

On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, Thomas Biege wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:34:10 +0100 (MET) > From: Thomas Biege <thomas@suse.de> > To: Jan-Philip Velders <jpv@jvelders.tn.tudelft.nl> > Cc: linux-security@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Security - intern] [linux-security] *ALERT*: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild. > The worm just exploits old security holes, so

Hello Gluster Community, while reading that article: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-specs/blob/master/under_review/worm-compliance.md there seems to be an interesting feature planned for the WORM Xlator: *Scheduled Auto-commit*: Scan Triggered Using timeouts for untouched files. The next scheduled namespace scan will cause the transition. CTR DB via libgfdb can be used to find files that

GlusterFS WORM hard links will not be created OS is CentOS7 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170707/aaea8dfc/attachment.html>

hard linksA read-only file system does not produce a hard link in GlusterFS WORM mode. Is it impossible? OS is CentOS7 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170710/837d3179/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: error.png

Shortly after I subscribed to this Samba list I started receiving numerous emails infected with the Swen/Gibe worm. Many of these emails contained the email addresses of Samba list members. I believe a subscriber of the Samba list has the Swen virus. Has anyone else on this list been getting emails infected with the Swen/Gibe worm? Please update your virus definitions and do a virus scan just to

I have received the below notice about the rsync list. There is a worm among us. ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Return-Path: <postmaster@innevi.com> Received: from bleep.innevi.com ([64.30.26.9]) by mail.dubois-king.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1K7n3p14977 for <ppalumbo@dubois-king.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:49:03 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain;

Hi I am trying to simulate a Write Once Read Many (WORM) drive using Samba. Eg. Anyone can write on a drive, but once the file has been written no one can delete or modify the file. This is something that is quite easily done using a Windows Server, but I haven't managed to do so using Samba. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance Jean-Yes

Full_Name: Joerg Rauh Version: 2.5.0 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (84.168.226.163) Following Michael J. Crawley "Statistical Computing" on page 9 the worms.txt is required. After downloading it from the book's supporting website, which is http://www.bio.ic.ac.uk/research/mjcraw/statcomp/data/ I visually check the data against the book and they look identical. Then I do

gluster version 3.10.6, replica 3 volume, daemon is present but does not appear to be functioning peculiar behaviour. If I kill the glusterfs brick daemon and restart glusterd then the brick becomes available - but one of my other volumes bricks on the same server goes down in the same way it's like wack-a-mole. any ideas? [root at gluster-2 bricks]# glv status digitalcorpora > Status

> On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:20, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > Meanwhile over here in CentOS land, you still see SSH password guessers banging on every public IP that responds to port 22. Why? Because it still occasionally works. Increase the password strength minima, and this class of worm, too, will quickly die out. If the Windows fix was firewall on by default,

Perhaps someone will help me on this :- I have read a lot of examples of syn flood protect on the INPUT chain. That I have no question at all. I wonder if it make sense to perform syn flood protection at the FORWARD chain ? If packets are originated from a LAN worm, and are not targetted at the firewall itself, but rather at hosts in the internet, will it cause problem with the firewall itself,

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Alastair Neil <ajneil.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > gluster version 3.10.6, replica 3 volume, daemon is present but does not > appear to be functioning > > peculiar behaviour. If I kill the glusterfs brick daemon and restart > glusterd then the brick becomes available - but one of my other volumes > bricks on the same server goes down in