similar to: named failing with bind_dlz includes

On 08/28/2015 01:58 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/08/15 18:17, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Bind if failing with: >> >> include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; >> >> which has: >> >> # more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf >> # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen >> support. >> # >>

On 05/08/2019 10:14, Patrik wrote: > I am not using flatfiles and i using BIND_DLZ it shows in my log and i > do not use flatfiles. BIND_DLZ only. Oh yes you are, you have this in your /etc/bind/named.conf.local : ??? zone "patrikx3.com" { ??????? type master; ??????? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com"; ??????? include

... From your output below.. >> Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version << Then tell uss, why are 3 lines uncommented? I suggest, run : https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Anonimize it where needed, and show me your server setup. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van:

i want to use bind 9.11beta2 version. I do not see bind9_11.so Best regards cat /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support. # # This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file # # For example with # include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ)

Hello Rowland, See below as requested. /etc/named.conf # Global Configuration Options include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; options { dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; auth-nxdomain yes; directory

Hello Rowland, here is my named.conf* named.conf include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local"; include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones"; named.conf.default-zones zone "." { type hint; file "/etc/bind/db.root"; }; zone "localhost" { type master; file

On 31/08/2020 19:59, Peter Pollock wrote: > Yes, it is 192.168.2.0/24 <http://192.168.2.0/24> > > Thank you. OK, try these files: /etc/bind/named.conf -----------start--------------- // This is the primary configuration file for the BIND DNS server named. // // Please read /usr/share/doc/bind9/README.Debian.gz for information on the // structure of BIND configuration files in

>Sorry, but this is not the file created by the provision. >Rowland Please how i can find the correct file that was create with the provision ? And how i can read and learn more about the creation of Samba AD integration. Sorry i understand that "flatfile" but i don't know what i need to configure....... Regards Mauri

Hi Brady, I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that everything else is working, or the file was not included in the package. regards, John On 21/08/15 10:16, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 11:18, John Gardeniers wrote:

On 18/11/2020 19:27, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac wrote: > > ?It is /etc/named.conf and /etc/samba/smb.conf > > > # cat /etc/named.conf > > > ??tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; > > > include "/usr/local/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > OK, does the /usr/local/samba/bind-dns directory exist ? if it does, is the

On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 12:52, John Gardeniers wrote: >> Hi Brady, >> >> I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my >> newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when >> installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that >> everything else is working, or the file

Ugh, I was upgrading the AD server running on a CentOS 6.8 which uses named as its back-end. I have been running it for years with no problems. Today after upgrading bind named will not start. I get this error: Sep 28 23:32:25 nikita named[6369]: ---------------------------------------------------- Sep 28 23:32:25 nikita named[6369]: BIND 9 is maintained by Internet Systems Consortium, Sep 28

Hi, We migrated the domain to AD on a ubuntu 18.04 box with samba 4.7.6. The DNS backend is DLZ We are seeing DNS issues as per below When using dnsupdate we get the following error. The server can resolve the hostname(itself) added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.117.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 IPs: ['192.168.117.10'] need cache add: A server5.intdom.group 192.168.117.10

Rowland, Thanks for the reply. I believe you're right. It appears the zone information is retrieved from '/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf'? Correct? I notice I do not have 'named.conf'. I have 'named.conf.update'. On 12/16/2014 9:21 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/12/14 13:54, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Looking to switch to Bind.

Good evening People! I have a problem when I start the named service. Check this example: [root at pc ~]# systemctl status named.service● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)   Active: active (running) since Thu 2018-06-07 21:15:06 AST; 10min ago  Process: 12495 ExecStop=/bin/sh -c

Hello list: I would like change the dns backend from Samba Internal DNS to BIND_DLZ . I compiled samba 4.1.7 on debian wheezy. But when I did the tutorial https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Backend_BIND I noticed that there was no file /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf nor dns.keytab. I found a file named on /usr/local/samba/share/setup/named.conf but I'm not sure that's the

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Hi, I'm resending this to the list since I cannot see it on the archive, for some reason... I recently upgraded two (running stable) systems from Debian Wheezy to Jessie. Samba version has not changed since on Wheezy I was using the one from wheezy-backports (v4.1.17), same as on jessie. These are 2 basic DCs without any additional config. Since the upgrade, every day at either at 10 PM or 8

Hai, cat "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf" also please. And check if the correct bind9_dlz is enabled. dpkg -l | grep bind9 Jessie, should be 9.9 Stretch should be 9.10 If this server was upgraded then you need to manualy adjust the file above. Looks to my bind9-dlz is enable in smb.conf but not loaded. cat /var/log/daemon.log | grep dlz You should see thing like: samba_dlz:

Good evening from Singapore, I have just setup Samba 4.11.6 and CentOS 8.1 as Active Directory Domain Controller. Thread: Teo En Ming's Manual for Setting Up Samba 4.11.6 and CentOS 8.1 (1911) Linux Server QEMU/KVM Virtual Machine as an Active Directory Domain Controller (AD DC) Link: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-February/228348.html Question is, why are my