similar to: More on bind_dlz - documentation I have not found

On 28/08/15 13:15, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > In the shower this morning, I realized that samba's dlz is through its > ldap interface, probably through dhcp. :) > > All of that work researching how to set up a dlz database for naught. > This is NOT documented in either: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS > or >

On 08/28/2015 08:55 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/08/15 13:15, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> In the shower this morning, I realized that samba's dlz is through >> its ldap interface, probably through dhcp. :) >> >> All of that work researching how to set up a dlz database for >> naught. This is NOT documented in either: >> >>

On 08/03/2018 11:07 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On Aug 3, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> I seem to have an rsync versioning problem. > Have you ruled out the other causes of that error? For instance: > > https://askubuntu.com/a/716911 yeah.? It is backups, not backup.? Oops. > >> And researching this it comes down to a

On 08/28/2015 01:58 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/08/15 18:17, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Bind if failing with: >> >> include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; >> >> which has: >> >> # more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf >> # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen >> support. >> # >>

On 08/28/2015 09:37 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/08/15 14:13, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >>> >>>> I have not yet checked any ldap documentation on the wiki to see >>>> what it says, but I suspect a dhcp lease results in an ldap update. >>>> Would a lease expire remove that ldap info? > > It should do, if dhcp is set up

Hi Robert, yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer TTL values. Regards, - lars. Am 07.09.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: > > > On 09/07/2015 12:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration >> >> I am using

On 09/03/2015 01:48 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 03/09/15 18:38, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Progress on dns_dlz. At least I got things loading. If I don't >> include the dlz info bind starts, but if I do I get: >> >> Sep 03 13:31:57 homebase.home.htt named[21920]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' >> using driver dlopen >> Sep 03 13:31:58

On 07/09/15 21:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Is there some option on the slave to set the frequency of the AXFR? > Say every hour? > > On 09/07/2015 03:45 PM, Lars Hanke wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when >> the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer >> TTL values.

Progress on dns_dlz. At least I got things loading. If I don't include the dlz info bind starts, but if I do I get: Sep 03 13:31:57 homebase.home.htt named[21920]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Sep 03 13:31:58 homebase.home.htt named[21920]: samba_dlz: Failed to connect to /var/lib/samba/private/dns/sam.ldb permissions seem right: # ls -ls

On 08/26/2015 04:28 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 26/08/15 21:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/26/2015 03:50 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 26/08/15 20:39, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/26/2015 03:26 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 26/08/15 20:14, Robert Moskowitz wrote:

On 09/03/2015 02:12 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 03/09/15 19:01, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 09/03/2015 01:48 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 03/09/15 18:38, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> Progress on dns_dlz. At least I got things loading. If I don't >>>> include the dlz info bind starts, but if I do I get: >>>>

Are you setting up a AD DC or old style NT PDC ? see : /etc/default/sernet-samba to "classic". for NT PDC /etc/default/sernet-samba to "ad". for AD DC. greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >Robert Moskowitz >Verzonden: vrijdag 28 augustus 2015 16:13 >Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at

Bind if failing with: include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; which has: # more /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support. # # This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file # # For example with # include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; # # This configures dynamically loadable

On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Jim, > > Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >> the samdom.example.com zone to the Samba DNS running on the second >> (virtual) interface >> >> Samba is the auth nameserver for samdom.example.com > If

On 08/26/2015 03:50 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 26/08/15 20:39, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/26/2015 03:26 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 26/08/15 20:14, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> One of the Centos 7 arm developers built the sernet 4.2 for me to >>>> start testing. >>>> >>>>

I seem to have an rsync versioning problem. The sender is an old ClearOS6 server with rsynv 3.0.6 The receiver is a brand new Centos7-armv7 server with rsync 3.1.2 I am running rsync over ssh Got the error: rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(600) [sender=3.0.6] And researching this it comes down to a versioning issue.? But all I have found was to upgrade the

On 08/27/2015 04:52 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>>>> Hello Jim, >>>>> >>>>> Am

I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I come across the following: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now as dates on this bug are 2 years old?

Hi All, Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on starting over. Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So, being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain, anyway, I was thinking: Run BIND as normal, but bind it to only eth0 Set up an eth0:0

On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>> Hello Jim, >>> >>> Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >>>> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >>>> the samdom.example.com zone to