similar to: Samba4 DC/AD documents created in redirected folders with bogus UID

I just noticed that my fresh install of Samba 4.2.3 has the same behaviour. I have a share (\\samba\it_share)) and some users when creating files have the UID as 3000000 and some have their correct UIDs. Share permissons are being controlled by Windows ACLs. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Mark Foley <mfoley at novatec-inc.com> wrote: > More information, > > It appears I've

On 20/08/15 15:24, Mark Foley wrote: > Guilherme Boing, on 19 Aug 2015 14:31 you wrote: > >> I just noticed that my fresh install of Samba 4.2.3 has the same behaviour. > Did you get a solution? > > Odd, but this topic doesn't seem to be getting much traction. I wonder what > people are using Samba4 for. Outside of hard-cord samba-junkies who love > spending hours

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: donderdag 20 augustus 2015 16:56 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba4 DC/AD documents created in >redirected folders with bogus UID > >On 20/08/15 15:24, Mark Foley wrote: >> Guilherme Boing, on 19 Aug 2015 14:31 you wrote:

On 20/08/15 18:26, Guilherme Boing wrote: > Yes, you are correct. > > The users where the UID 3000000 was the owner were users that belong to > Domain Admins group. > Is this the correct behaviour ? I have other users that are in different > groups (e.g. Marketing) and whenever they create a new file, their own UID > shows up as the owner of that file, not the

More information, It appears I've had this issue since installing Samba 4.1.0 about 6 months ago. When I add a domain user, the DC resisdent redirected folder gets synchronized with the user's desktop with the correct UID. For some users, but not all, new "My Documents" get created with UID 3000000 on the DC, not the user's correct ID as shown by wbinfo. I haven't

Guilherme Boing, on 19 Aug 2015 14:31 you wrote: > I just noticed that my fresh install of Samba 4.2.3 has the same behaviour. Did you get a solution? Odd, but this topic doesn't seem to be getting much traction. I wonder what people are using Samba4 for. Outside of hard-cord samba-junkies who love spending hours testing all kinds of esoteric features, I think most serious Samba4 AD/DC

>Those are the fundamentals. Other than Windows Authentication >and redirected >folders, I don't really see the point of Active Directory. I use Active Directory Group policies for: settings in windows folder redirects printer distribution base on user or group.. software installations base on user or group.. and Single Sign On for multple systems, windows and linux. a nice to

Oooo!! You may have something there! I don't know whether these users are in the admin group, but they could be. I have been messing around with admin priv in order to allow users to be admins on their own workstations. I've got a Group Policy method with computer startup script and have also created a login on the user's workstation with the same name as the user, but as local

Yes, you are correct. The users where the UID 3000000 was the owner were users that belong to Domain Admins group. Is this the correct behaviour ? I have other users that are in different groups (e.g. Marketing) and whenever they create a new file, their own UID shows up as the owner of that file, not the "Marketing" group. This only happens with Domain Admins ? Thanks. On Thu, Aug

Good to know that this is not a bug. Thank you! On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > wrote: > On 20/08/15 18:26, Guilherme Boing wrote: > >> Yes, you are correct. >> >> The users where the UID 3000000 was the owner were users that belong to >> Domain Admins group. >> Is this the correct behaviour ? I have

I've been running the same configuration for a couple of years now, and since I've upgraded to Office 2007, MS Word and MS Excel files save to my samba shares as -r-------- even when they are opened as being chmod 777. Files I create/edit using other editors or windows explorer are put onto the share with the correct permissions. My conf looks like this: [global] workgroup = WG

Hola a todos, Quería preguntar si alguno sabe como puedo identificar registros con un mismo ID en el tiempo, pero que hacer referencia a objetos o individuos diferentes. En mi caso en particular estoy estudiando un animal que tiene una vida media cercana 2 años, y tengo una serie longitudinal de 25 años. El problema es que durante el muestreo en algunos casos durante la recoleccion de los datos,

Not quite 4 years ago I replaced our office SBS 2008 server with Samba4. I added Group Policies one of which was for Redirected Folders. I created a new GPO, "HPRS Groups" and did Edit > User Configuration > Policies > Windows Settings > Folder Redirection > right-click on Documents > Properties > Target = Settings Basic - Redirect everyone's folder to the same

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:32:52 +0200 L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > > OK, Everyone is currently set to FULL CONTROL. I'll set that to READ. > > Ai, now... Nobody can write over the share, pc's wil complain. > Some GPO setting will stop working. But, when I ran your samba-check-set-sysvol.sh script it told me to set EVERYONE: READ. See below: > > $

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:52:46 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Given no responses on this question for a few days, I'm concluding > that we're out of ideas on this problem. Let me propose a couple of > ideas. Apparently, the basic Windows FOLDER and SHARE permissions > are correct according to Louis' recommendations (see message below).

Imo, this is a left over of an old bug, just remove the file Registry.po imo, i'll bet its never used. The computer looks for Registry.pol not Registry.po. > -rwxrwx--- 1 root users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.po* > -rwxrwx--- 1 3000000 users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.pol* Look at the date 2014, and i do remember something about this. But... What does getfacl say about

hey, I'm using samba version 3.6.6 on debian wheezy and windows 7 clients with office 2010, on my samba share I've the following settings: [cad] comment = CAD path = /mnt/samba-daten/work/webdav/cad writable = yes valid users = root, @cad, @fg-domuser admin users = abc, def, ghi create mask = 0770 force create mode = 0770 directory mask = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 veto

Hola, Antes de nada, muchas gracias por tu ayuda. El código se ha acercado bastante, pero no termina de funcionar porque considera cada captura de un individuo como años consecutivos aunque haya pasado más tiempo entre ellos. Por ejemplo el individuo 4 es capturado por primera vez el año 1 y por segunda vez el año 3, por lo que debería de ser renombrado ya que en este ejemplo en concreto

Hola, Please, mira si esta vez funciona: #---------------------------------------------- ID <- c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 6, 8, 12, 7, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 1, 21, 22, 19 ) Year <- c (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6) df <- data.frame (ID, Year) df ID <- c(1,

Hi, I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these global settings (not overridden): read only = No force create mode = 0777 force directory mode = 0777 inherit acls = yes inherit owner = yes inherit permissions = yes On a Windows client, I have Thunderbird 24.0 storing its profile and mail on the Samba share. The