similar to: "wbinfo --sid-to-gid" returns false gids

17.07.2015, 17:30, "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 17/07/15 12:03, Andrej Surkov wrote: >>  I've got this on the backup DC >> >>  root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 >>  3000000 > > OK, you have problems there, but not what you think. On my first DC > (note I don't have

On 17/07/15 12:03, Andrej Surkov wrote: > I've got this on the backup DC > > root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 > 3000000 OK, you have problems there, but not what you think. On my first DC (note I don't have a 'primary' or a 'backup' DC, I just have DC's) if I run 'wbinfo --name-to-sid=Domain\

On 20/02/15 21:27, Davor Vusir wrote: > > Rowland Penny skrev den 2015-02-19 18:15: >> OK, there is a discussion over on samba-technical about nss_winbind >> and the question about Administrator being mapped to 0 was raised. >> Now I have always thought that it should, but in fairness, I decided >> to see what happens when it isn't, so I removed Administrator

On 30/01/15 16:55, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote: > I still do not follow you. An additional reason for including > administrator in the first place, not including that I actually want > it to work against the linux boxes like every other domain user, was > because winbind returns the exact same mapping when using idmap > backend RID with range 300000-499999 (i.e not rfc2307 attributes)

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

On 30/01/15 17:29, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote: > On one of your DCs? As in you run Samba for your DCs? > > This thread was using Server 2012 R2 as DCs, and that was what my > response was aimed at. I am also using Server 2012 R2 for DCs. In this > case the Administrator is "just a user" seen from the linux boxes. > That Administrator is assigned a root-role in a Samba DC

OK, there is a discussion over on samba-technical about nss_winbind and the question about Administrator being mapped to 0 was raised. Now I have always thought that it should, but in fairness, I decided to see what happens when it isn't, so I removed Administrator from idmap.ldb and restarted samba. Before restarting samba, I checked a few things, on the DC, getfacl returned this for

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, > except for 300000. Below is an example. > > root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ > total 16 > drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies > drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp

On 30/01/15 16:20, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote: > I do not understand the point about issues with administrator beeing > mapped to a "random" rfc2307 UID. You need to explain the details > surrounding that part to me as my experience is that this is OK and > even necessary. > > The only reason for not giving Administrator a "random" UID/GID that I > can think

Rowland, no domain user can authenticate on any system and running sysvolreset followed by sysvolcheck results in a crash. If the sysvol permissions are correct, sysvolcheck does not crash. If I attempt to join a NAS or workstation to the domain I get NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. Researching these symptoms turns up a thread about a corrupt idmap.ldb where a group SID and user SID may be the same or

I forgot about ldbsearch. Here is a dump of xid numbers. root at dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xidNumber xidNumber: 3000028 xidNumber: 3000013 xidNumber: 3000033 xidNumber: 3000003 xidNumber: 3000032 xidNumber: 3000023 xidNumber: 3000019 xidNumber: 3000010 xidNumber: 65534 xidNumber: 3000031 xidNumber: 3000022 xidNumber: 3000026 xidNumber: 3000017 xidNumber: 3000027

Greetings, All! I've discovered a nasty mismatch in my recently upgraded domain. It seems that a number of builtin groups have mappings in idmap.ldb that overlap with posixAccount mappings in the sam.ldb. Namely, # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/ads.example.com/scripts/ # owner: root # group: 544 user::rwx user:root:rwx group::rwx group:544:rwx group:30000:r-x group:30001:rwx

On 03/07/15 15:18, Ryan Ashley wrote: > The only Unix client I can think of would be the Buffalo NAS. It runs > Samba3 and hosts various shares via SMB. DNS is handled by BIND9 on the > Samba4 DC. DNS does work and the domain name resolves to the IP address > of the server. DHCP is also handled on the DC. As for the GPO's, they're > in the correct place as far as I can tell.

On 02/07/15 16:55, Ryan Ashley wrote: > Rowland, here is what I found in the ldb. > > # record 68 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > cn: S-1-5-32-544 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-32-544 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 3000000 > distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > > # record 70 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-549 > cn: S-1-5-32-549 > objectClass: sidMap >

:-| ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol Em 16-06-2017 13:38, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:15:19 -0300 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, sorry, uncomment a line :-D >> >> Yes exist! >> >> ls -ld

Hi, > OK, I take it that 3000009 points to CN=S-1-5-11 and it is just > CN=S-1-5-18 that is wrong by pointing at proxmox$ (which incidentally, > is one of your computers) > Try backing up idmap.ldb, then open idmap.ldb in ldbedit, find and > delete the stanza that holds CN=S-1-5-18, it will look like this: > > dn: CN=S-1-5-18 > cn: S-1-5-18 > objectClass: sidMap >

Rowland, Thank you for the quick response. I have just run net cache flush no change in problem. I have dumped the idmap.ldp using ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb > idmap.txt and did some sorting, that is how I found the duplicates. On 1/13/2017 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > samba-tool ntacl > >sysvolreset

On 04/11/2020 00:14, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > Hmm, you say 'uidNumber' but I have xidNumber: > # editing 1 records > # record 1 > dn: CN=S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > cn: S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 1044 >

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > The trouble came from 'root' or groups '3000002' and '3000003'? > No and very very probably no & no ;-) > > How can i fix them? Thanks. > Fix what? The owner has to be 'root', and you can find out just who > '3000002' & '3000003' are by opening

Greetings, Rowland Penny! >>> Hi Louis, It works for me >>> This appears in log.smbd on my DC when I run the same command: >>> [2015/03/30 10:15:42.442881, 3] >>> ../source3/smbd/service.c:856(make_connection_snum) >>> dc01 (ipv6:::1:43602) connect to service IPC$ initially as user NT >>> AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON (uid=65534, gid=3000013)