similar to: Strange issue with share access on domain controllers

Hi, No change According to netbios aliases documentation, it only modify NETBIOS announce, but I'm using DNS to access the host (and it is correctly resolved since smbclient access works, shares list works on windows) Regards Le 13/07/2015 15:53, Zerwes, Klaus a écrit : > set > > netbios aliases = > > in the global section of smb.conf > > Good luck > > Klaus

set netbios aliases = in the global section of smb.conf Good luck Klaus Klaus Zerwes Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung | IT-Auslandskoordinator Franz-Mehring-Platz 1 | 10243 Berlin Tel. +49 30 44310-555 | Fax +49 30 44310-182 zerwes at rosalux.de | www.rosalux.de ________________________________________ Von: samba [samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]" im Auftrag von

Make sure you use the new GPO policies. Looks like the problem "[Samba] Windows 10 in Samba 3 domain: netlogon share access denied" Its not only for windows 10, also 7 and 8.x Solution: GPEDIT.MSC -> Computer -> Administrative templates -> Network -> Networkprovider -> Hardened UNC Paths Added \\foo.lan\netlogon and Value:

Another old thread I’m resurrecting; apologies, but I have also been experiencing this issue. I have 10 international remote sites over very lossy WAN links. Getting traffic to them from HQ is a challenge; them trying to talk directly each other over umpteen paths is even worse. They are able to accomplish this (somewhat) because we have a mesh VPN setup with direct site-to-site connectivity, but

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

Hi, on our samba 4 domain member server we use the vfs objects module 'recycle'. Unfortunately we ran into a strange permission problem with deleted folders. The newly created folders in the recycle folder have the wrong permission. The deleted file(s) itself has the correct group (rw) permissions. The shares correct permissions: getfacl Papierkorb/ # file: Papierkorb/ # owner: root #

Hi, we are in the process of testing a migration from our NT Classic Domain with OpenLdap to Samba AD. In our test setup migration of all accounts, groups and computer accounts went well using the classicupgrade path. Next step now is testing how to add a member server for file server services. We were able to get the server to join the domain and also idmapping works mostly as expected.

Setup a DC using 4.0.3 - all appears to go fine... Setup a second DC and everything works fine to here...but I'm not sure if replication is actually working or not. Here's what I get from ./samba-tool drs showrepl I've also done. [./samba-tool drs kcc -Uadministrator dc2.samba.somedom.local] in an attempt to fix the replication problem. (or what I think is a problem.) [The outbound

Maybe this is a stupid idea, but what we are doing here is using just the domain name for all sorts of services, i.e. LDAP. So instead of pointing a client to dc1.somedom.contoso.com or dc2.somedom.contoso.com, we point them to somedom.contoso.com which is then resolved to both and the client can pick. Best regards Johannes Am Mo., 23. Nov. 2020 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Rowland penny via samba <

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

Hello. I'm trying to perform a classic upgrade from Samba 3.6.6 with LDAP backend on Debian to 4.1.6 on Ubuntu on a new machine. The samba-tools creates the following *smb.con*f: *# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf** *[global] workgroup = SOMEDOM realm = somedom.local netbios name = SOMEDOM server role = member server passdb backend = samba_dsdb server

Hi, I have a setup with 2 DCs which works just fine. Since we have some legacy systems which can't deal with 2 DNS Names I used ctdb to manage a floating IP (in addition to the fixed IPs) between the DCs which works great also. But then the replication breaks for some parts (Users still were replicated) because the floating IP was added to the internal DNS zone and one of the DC tried to

I wrapped the LDA command in a script. I can see that Postfix passes "@@mydomain.tld" as the -d argument, without quotes. I then adapted the script to specifically replace this address with "@"@mydomain.tld, but this results in the following error message by Dovecot: ??? auth: Info: userdb(?): Username character disallowed by auth_username_chars: 0x22 (username:

I upgraded to Dovecot 2.3.0.1 as advised, but it still seems broken. In the Postfix log I now see: Mar? 6 13:49:03 myhost amavis[7165]: (07165-10) K00VtLRHdrYw FWD from <admin at mydomain.tld> -> <"@"@mydomain.tld>, BODY=7BIT 250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B8CA22DA1B37 Mar? 6 13:49:03 myhost amavis[7165]: (07165-10) Passed CLEAN

As per my problem yesterday with the Cisco 7960 and getting it talking to Asterisk on a different subnet, I gave up trying and just put the Asterisk box back on the internal subnet. However, I made two changes: - the external IP address is set on an ethernet alias eth0:0 - the main Linux router will change outgoing requests from 10.1.1.2 to the external IP (rather than the default behaviour of

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Op 7-3-2018 om 15:40 schreef Stephan Bosch: > > > Op 7-3-2018 om 13:46 schreef Philipp Berger: >> I wrapped the LDA command in a script. I can see that Postfix passes >> "@@mydomain.tld" as the -d argument, without quotes. >> I then adapted the script to specifically replace this address with >> "@"@mydomain.tld, but this results in the

On 05/08/15 09:35, Zerwes, Klaus wrote: > Helo Mike > what about > getent passwd 3000042 3000047 3000024 > > Klaus > ________________________________________ > Von: samba [samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]&quot; im Auftrag von &quot;Mike [1100100 at gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. August 2015 00:48 > An: samba > Betreff: [Samba] Identify AD Domain User

# Global parameters [global] interfaces = bond0 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 5 auth:5 winbind:8 printcap name = /dev/null realm = SOMEDOM.AT security = ADS username map = /etc/samba/user.map winbind refresh tickets = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes workgroup = ARBEITSGRUPPE idmap config arbeitsgruppe:unix_nss_info = yes idmap config arbeitsgruppe:range =

So, I'm wondering if anyone has a "howto" on promoting a non-master DC to FSMO/Operation master and making it the Primary DC? [I don't see it in the Wiki and searching doesn't produce anything for me.] In my particular case, I have a couple of test DC's I've setup. Rather than tear them down, I might like to just move them into production/final testing and then