similar to: Constant error messages about failure to remove oplock

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:09:05PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote: > Hi Volker, > > Yes this problem happens when we have "kernel oplocks = no". This happened > constantly in one of production systems & so we disabled level2-oplock > /set kernel-oplocks=yes (to avoid this issue). So unfortunately don’t have > an environment where it reproduces now & cannot capture

Hi Volker, Yes this problem happens when we have "kernel oplocks = no". This happened constantly in one of production systems & so we disabled level2-oplock /set kernel-oplocks=yes (to avoid this issue). So unfortunately don’t have an environment where it reproduces now & cannot capture strace. I modified smbtorture/smb2 to do a test exactly like the tcpdump trace, but the

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:39:58AM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote: > Hi All, > > Need your help/inputs on what could be the probable cause/how to debug > this further. > > We are using samba-4.0.25 & expose a share that has oplocks enabled & no > kernel-oplocks set. We constantly see these messages in samba logs > > [2015/06/25 03:05:30.593150, 0, pid=1581,

Hi Volker, Thanks for your reply. When the problem was happening(before we turned off level2-oplocks), we had captured one run with smbd debug all:10 (unfortunately we didn’t setup for other modules like vfs etc). Can you please see if this below trace helps? Thanks. [2015/06/25 03:05:30.408432, 3, pid=1581, effective(2030299, 2000514), real(2030299, 0)]

Hello all, We have an application running over samba share that creates a lot of 0-length files, and eventually throws an error because one of more of the files could not be created or does not appear to be created. At the same time in the samba log there are many messages like [2015/02/02 14:02:05.545710, 0, pid=32169, class=locking]

I've been using Samba for a number of years and suddenly Samba started throwing oplock errors and I simply can't figure out why. I've not changed any config parameters in some time, but have updated my version of samba as new packages become available for my distro. I'm running Centos 5.9 and the following versions of samba from stock Centos: samba3x-common-3.6.6-0.129.el5

Last week we finally upgraded our servers from Samba 3 to Samba 4 and so far everything runs smoothly. For now we run 4.15.13 with an old NT-style domain while we are preparing to migrate to Samba AD-style domain. Since the upgrade we have the issue that the logon scripts are not executed for domain users. It works a 100% for domain admins and 0% for non admin users and we have no idea why. We

Wolfgang, (cc Linux XFS list) (cc Samba list) Quoting wolfgang.glas@ev-i.at: > I just found you message in the samba mailing list archives and foiund > out, that we have a very similar problem. We are using samba-2.2.1a on a > kerenl-2.4.16 and we use reiserfs. > We also experience data corruption with messages like: > > [2002/03/14 15:15:26, 0] >

Hi: We use 4.9.4 based samba in our product and one of our customers is running into a strange issue. If they right click on a folder and get the properties, it reports incorrect size information. When we looked at the network trace, we see that the client is walking the tree and getting information about files and folders.. Suddenly out of the blue, it opens a folder (which it had previous opened

Here is a second, somewhat related question to my last one. When looking over the network trace I have ran into something I cannot explain. It may be quite proper, in which case I am misreading the trace. But I would appreciate it if someone would explain this to me. In packet 109 of the trace (during a login with no profile on the server), I see a "NT Create AndX request"

I have a reproducible intermittent error large site - "The specified network name is no longer available". This happens when copying large files. Below is part of log level 10 output & strace. Sorry for the long posting. I will probably need to put the loglevel 10 attached to a bugzilla - but thought I would try the lists initially. RHEL4 samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4

What is the function of the create QFID request. Looking at the request it does not seem to have any name or other discernible information. I've searched the web for information on how to decode the request. The monitor breaks down most of the block. But the file name seems to be null. The response to the request also does not have a file name. But it does show lastaccesstime creationtime

Hi all, I''ve committed an alpha version of File.nopen (native open) to win32-file. This is a wrapper for CreateFile(). A quick synopsis: * File.nopen(file,access_mode,share_mode,creation_mode,flags) * * A ''native'' open method. This uses CreateFile() behind the scenes instead of * the _open() function. This allows much greater flexibility when it comes * to

Background: This situation is using Rational ClearCase in a situation with server on Solaris 10 and clients on a mixture of Windows XP and Windows 7, with access to the VOB (repository) enabled via Samba version: 3.4.9 Users are getting a consistent error with a specific ClearCase operation (Add to Source Control), which we have traced to a Samba interaction. The issue: For the interaction

Chris, I've done a little more thinking about this (putting source definitions into bytecode/assembler) files. Despite my previous assertions to the contrary, using the LLVM type and constant global declarations in the source definitions section is a little limiting because (a) it limits the choices for source compiler writers, (b) it might imply a larger amount of information than would

> I've done a little more thinking about this (putting source definitions > into bytecode/assembler) files. Despite my previous assertions to the > contrary, using the LLVM type and constant global declarations in the > source definitions section is a little limiting because (a) it limits > the choices for source compiler writers, (b) it might imply a larger > amount of

On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 21:42, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > 5. The ExtraInfo class supports pure virtual methods that are > > invoked by LLVM to notify its subclass(es) when an optimization > > causes a function, type or global variable to be deleted. No > > other notifications should be necessary. > > This sounds _extremely_ limited.

Dear all, I have used optim a lot in contexts where it would useful to be able to iterate function myfun that, in addition to the primary objective to be minimized ('minimize.me'), could return other values such as alternative metrics of the minimization, informative intermediate values from the calculations, etc. myfun <- function() { ... return(list(minimize.me = minimize.me, R2 =

Why is a windows 10 pro system issuing a sequence of smb2 commands every 30 seconds or so? SMB2:C CREATE(0x5), Sh(None), QFid, File=NULL@#15679 followed by SMB2:C QUERY INFORMATION(0x10),Class=Query FS Full Size, FID=0xB7CD3148(NULL@#15679) Folowed by SMB2:C CLOSE(0x6),FID=0xB7CD3148(NULL@#15679 Not sure why this sequence starts or stops. But it can run for hours at a time. This is happening

Hi, I'm facing an issue with at least two Samba servers in production both showing important number of log entries like: smbd[27355]: PANIC: assert failed at smbd/oplock.c(149): exclusive_oplocks_open>=0 Looking at the source code, this panic is triggered when the number of exclusive oplocks for a given file becomes negative. Once triggered for one smbd process, this process can