similar to: Migration Samba3 -> Samba4: Accessing domain member server is not working

Good morning Rowland and samba list ... Rowland Penny wrote on 03.07.2015 18:36:32: > From: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org, > Date: 03.07.2015 18:40 > Subject: Re: [Samba] Migration Samba3 -> Samba4: Accessing domain > member server is not working > Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org > > On 03/07/15

Good morning Rowland and samba list ... Rowland Penny wrote on 03.07.2015 18:36:32: > From: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org, > Date: 03.07.2015 18:40 > Subject: Re: [Samba] Migration Samba3 -> Samba4: Accessing domain > member server is not working > Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org > > On 03/07/15

Hi ... When trying to migrate from samba3 to samba 4.2.2 I am facing a severe problem that bugs me for hours now. I cannot get a samba 4.2.2 fileserver to work with a samba 4.2.2 PDC as a domain member. My scenario: Samba 3 network. PDC and fileserver where Samba 3.6.25. LDAP backend. We can't move to AD right now so I wanted to move to the current 4.2.2 at least to do this step but to

Hello Rowland and Christian Thanks for your replies... Yes ONEVISION and MYDOM are the very same here. Copy/Paste. "Christian Naumer" <christian.naumer at greyfish.net> wrote on 18.04.2023 20:12:35: > Am 18. April 2023 14:29:29 MESZ schrieb Roland Schwingel via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >Hi... > > > >We are still using NT4 classic

Good Morning Marc, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote on 09.07.2015 17:49:36: > Am 09.07.2015 um 14:35 schrieb Roland Schwingel: > > I got windows 10 pro build 10159 running in a vm. I added the 2 well > > known registry changes I always add to windows 7 also to windows 10. So > > far so good. I joined the machine to my samba 4.2.2 PDC. Heureka! It >

Am 18. April 2023 14:29:29 MESZ schrieb Roland Schwingel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >Hi... > >We are still using NT4 classic domain with a couple of samba server but >want to upgrade step by step to AD as a distant goal. >We tried to upgrade to samba 4.17.7 as in intermediate step and keep LDAP >for now but fail as we could not find a suitable >example for

Hi, can you help? I am really struggling to find the answer to the following question. I have conducted a standard multiple regression using SPSS. The dependent variable is CE, and the independent variables are Ibelieve and Tbelieve. Because the independent variables are highly correlated I have examined the squared semi-partial correlations. I understand that the Ibelieve squared semi partial

Hello all, I guess that everyone knows the message "the trust relation between this workstation and the primary domain failed" when joining Win7 into samba domain. Unfortunately, the same problem appeared few hours/days after the machine was successfully joined in the domain(with reg keys from https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7) and user able to use it for awhile. Then at

On 4/23/2015 4:40 PM, Ty! Boyack wrote: > > TL;DR (or just in case someone comes across this with the same problem): > > At least with our config in our environment, the current Samba package > from the CentOS base repo fails to properly authenticate sessions > using passwords when acting as a domain member server. It will > authenticate sessions using kerberos fine.If you

Hi.... Some days ago I installed windows 8 pro from MSDN on one of my machines. I got a serious problem with it. I cannot logon as domain user. I first tried joining my domain from win8 with an unchanged win8 installation. This did fail. Afterwards I applied the usual windows 7 registry patches to allow a samba domain join and rebooted. Afterwards I could join my domain with no trouble. I

> hi all, > > my working samba-4.1.7 member of a samba3 domain (samba-3.5.3) failed > while updating to samba-4.2.0. Users were no longer able to access > shares because the trust account was broken. > > According to release notes (Winbindd/Netlogon improvements): > > For the client side we have the following new options: > "require strong key" (yes by

I have a problem with Asterisk-bristuffed using a zaphfc card. I am located in the Netherlands, so I have an ISDN line from KPN. When I start Asterisk, and plug in the ISDN line, everything works perfectly for about 5 minutes. And then the ISDN line is down for 1 minute, and after that minute, the line comes back up and works for another 5 minutes. Every time the line goes down I get the error

What is the minimum version of Samba supported on AIX version 5.1. I have installed version 2.0.7.0. Will this work? Thanks in advance. Ron Schwingel Technical Support NDS Solutions 303.755.4411(phone) 303.755.4545(fax) rschwing@ndsltd.com

Hi... We are still using NT4 classic domain with a couple of samba server but want to upgrade step by step to AD as a distant goal. We tried to upgrade to samba 4.17.7 as in intermediate step and keep LDAP for now but fail as we could not find a suitable example for id mapping. Hope someone can help! Previously we did run samba 4.7 on CentOS 7 without problems as domain controller and member

Is there a way to force ingress traffic into appearing as egress traffic for the purpose of traffic shaping. e.g. eth0 ------> TestMachine -------> lo ---------> TestMachine ---------> eth1 Can you use a loopback or similar interface so that it appears that the data is being sent out and back in a pseudo-interface? This would allow egress filtering as it was passed out

I think this is probably an XP SP2 issue but perhaps you've seen it before? We use smbclient 3.0.13 to download files from a machine "Testmachine" that used to run Windows 2000 and use the zonealarm firewall. A couple of days ago it was upgraded to XP SP2 (fully patched) using the built in Microsoft firewall. One folder "Example" was "shared" and the firewall

Don't be scared and take the challenge! :-) Reduce your smb.conf to the minimum as seen in the member server wiki and try it again. It should work then. Am 25. M?rz 2015 14:47:16 MEZ, schrieb "Tom S?derlund" <tom.k.soderlund at gmail.com>: >Tim, > >Thanks for the hint. Usermap for root applied, locally made requests >fail >now systematically with

Tim, Thanks for the hint. Usermap for root applied, locally made requests fail now systematically with "Could not connect to server <server address> Connection failed: NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED" It is kind of improvement :) Random things scare me. -Tom On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Tim <lists at kiuni.de> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > have a look at this: >

On 25/03/15 19:40, Tim wrote: > Don't be scared and take the challenge! :-) > > Reduce your smb.conf to the minimum as seen in the member server wiki and try it again. It should work then. > > Am 25. M?rz 2015 14:47:16 MEZ, schrieb "Tom S?derlund" <tom.k.soderlund at gmail.com>: >> Tim, >> >> Thanks for the hint. Usermap for root applied,

Hi Guys, After a chat with some helpful people on Freenode I've included as much information as I can think to about this error, if you need anything else please don't hesitate to ask. I run a webserver (remotely administered, no graphical user interface that i know of - certainly not one running all the time) - in the past few days this error has started to occur, the system dies and