similar to: classicupgrade

Hello Marc, thank you for your answer. I already added gidNumber 513 for the group. Now I added the two additional attribute for the group. I installed RSAT, and enabled the necessary modules according to the Samba wiki. I opened AD users and computers, and Domain Users' properties. When I click on the UNIX Attributes tab, I get an error: Execution denied. On the panel I see: NIS Domain: xxx;

Hi, I have Samba 4.2.10 server with NT4 configuration, with ldap backend on Debian Jessie, and I want to upgrade it to AD. I test it now in virtul environment. The classicupgrade was succesful. getent passwd username and chown "username:Domain Users" test.txt didn't work with this nsswitch.conf: passwd: files ldap group: files ldap shadow: files ldap , so I changed ldap to winbind.

Hi, I have a working Samba3 domain with 3.6 servers. Samba runs on Debian Wheezy and has openldap backend. I'm going to upgrade to Sernet Samba 4.1. I copied the pdc to a virtual machine to test the upgrade process. According to the wiki I cannot have duplicate sids, but I have about fourty. It seems they are the same that the net groupmap list command gives. Some smb.conf parameters: ldap

Hi, I set up Samba DCs for two sites. The first site is for example domain.ourdomain.com, the second is site2.ourdomain.com. On the first site, there will be 2 DCs, and one fileserver, on the second site there will be one DC, and it will act as fileserver too. Is it true that Samba's internal dns server won't good for that, and I need Bind, because of Bind's zone transfer feature?

On 09/08/2019 10:33, Pisch Tam?s via samba wrote: >> You have to give any users you require visible on Unix a uidNumber attribute > Ok, I can do it with samba-tool user edit... >> You have to give 'Domain Users' a gidNumber attribute. >> You have to give any group you require to be visible a gidNumber > I know that I can set gidNumber when I create a group, but how

>What are you thinking to transfer the zones to ? I try to explain, why I asked the question. Now we have NT4 style Samba domain, with ldap backend, and Bind. We have two sites, they are connected through VPN. On the servers, Bind configured as master-slave. On every site, there is a master, for their own domain, and they are each others' slave. As I know, this is zone transfer. I want to

Pisch Tam?s <pischta at gmail.com> ezt ?rta (id?pont: 2019. j?l. 4., Cs, 13:15): > > >OK, I set up Buster RC3 in a VM > Thanks a lot! > > >I could add 'Domain Admins' to the 'Properties' on the share without any > >problem. > :o > > > Back to Buster machine: > > root at dbrc3:~# ls -lad /home/users > > drwxrwx---+ 2 root

> >> Current plan : add a third DC, make dc2 a dm file server. Best solution > > imo. > > Yes, I know that it would be better to use a separate dc, but I didn't > > want it on that site. > Hi Pisch, that wasn't aimed at you, but it does show why you should > never hijack an existing thread, my fault for not forking it off into a > new thread, sorry ;-)

Hi, I installed a SaMBa PDC and a BDC. When I log in to an XP client with a new user, sometimes I get the initial profile settings from the netlogon share, but often from local. When I get the local default settings, it is not syncronized to the server at logout. Even if I get the new profile from the server, on the same client, next time, with a new user, I get the new profile from local. I

I have a script which carefully manages uidNumber and gidNumber attributes for users and groups. We just recently put it into production. I plan to release it as open source software soon -- and get Rowland's blessing :-) On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 3:42 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 21/06/2019 07:49, Pisch Tam?s via samba wrote: > > Hi, >

Hi, there was a topic in 2017 with this subject (I don't know, whether my mail will be a new topic, or will be appended to the old). >> > If you just run 'samba-tool user create testuser' you will get a >> > user without a uidNumber. See example5 from 'samba-tool user create >> > --help' for how to create a user with a uidNumber, but there is a

> >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I would like to set filesystem permissions on shares (users, at the > >>> moment) with Windows 10 (1809). > >>> On the Samba side, the filesystem is ext4. I tested the extended > >>> attributes usability with setfattr/getfattr, and setfacl/getfacl, and > >>> they work. > >>> I set

Hi, I wanted to use a symlink in a share, but it didn't work. I tried it on Samba 4.10. I thought that follow symlinks = yes is enough (and it is default). I googled about it, and found a solution: unix extensions = no in the global section, and wide links = Yes follow symlinks = yes in the shares' section. According to the man, unix extensions = yes is the default, but the samba-tool

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>

Hi, I'm going classicupgrade our samba3 to samba4 next weekend, and suddenly realised something: I intent to keep my samba3 PDC machine called 'filehost' as a member server, to only serve files. However, after classicupgrade my new (freshly installed) DC1 will of course have the netbios name from my 'old' samba3 machine. ('filehost') Meaning I end up with two

Dear samba list after a classic upgrade i lose the printer drivers uploaded in NT Domain mode the drivers files are still present in print$ share but enumdrivers rpcclient command list no drivers... did i forgot a file in the dbdir during classicupgrade call or this data are not handled during classicupgrade ? Thanx

Hi, I am the next scenario: ############################################################################# SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture) ?############################################################################# Two Storage Machines with: HARDWARE DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache, Bus 1333FSB RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb) 8 HDD 1 TB, Near Line SAS 3,5"

Hi, we might have encountered a possible python 3 bug in samba 4.11. We are using the sernet-samba packages. While the classicupgrade works on centos6 (using python 2) it fails on centos8 (using python3) with a classic python3 bug message: # samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=pdc-files/ --realm=ad.xxx.de --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL pdc-files/smb.conf INFO 2019-09-25 06:15:34,366 pid:12017

Hi, I have a problem during the classicupgrade. The problem was discussed in march on this list, but there seems to be nosolution. Can anyone help? ... Setting password for administrator Administrator password has been set to password of user 'root' idmapping sid_to_xid failed for id[0]=S-1-5-32-544: NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_OWNER.

Hi all, Is this something I should report in bugzilla? In my smb3.conf I have vfs object = recycle full_audit crossrename and when doing a classicupgrade, I'm getting a segmentation fault. It doesn't finish. (tried 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4) When removing the line, the classicupgrade finishes successfully. It's easy to get around, but wouldn't it be nicer not to crash..?