similar to: Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server"

2015 Jul 03
4
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
Thank you Felix. On 02/07/15 16:18, Felix Matouschek wrote: > Hi David, > > I experienced this issue as well, it's currently a limitation of Samba 4.2.2. > Samba 4.2.2 DCs do not support pulling home directories and login shells from AD via rfc2307. > > I solved this issue with the "template homedir" and "template shell" directives. > You lose some
2015 Jun 29
1
Winbindd Strangeness
On 25/06/15 13:44, David Minard wrote: >> On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >>> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >>> >>>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>>> running smbd and winbindd.
2015 Jun 25
1
Winbindd Strangeness
> > On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >> >>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>> running smbd and winbindd. >>> >>> I've followed the wiki and for the most part
2015 Jun 24
1
Winbindd Strangeness
On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: > I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is running smbd and winbindd. > > I've followed the wiki and for the most part it's working. However, after stuffing up the ranges, then fixing them up, when I create new accounts, adding all the
2015 Jun 23
1
Winbindd Strangeness
I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is running smbd and winbindd. I've followed the wiki and for the most part it's working. However, after stuffing up the ranges, then fixing them up, when I create new accounts, adding all the Unix attributes, the UID_Number is not showing the correct value
2015 Jul 03
0
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
Hi David, > Just to clarify, is it only the DC that doesn't return desired values of HomeDirectory and Shell? Yes, it is only the DC that doesn't pull HomeDirectory and Shell via rfc2307. (when using winbindd) Member servers with winbindd do pull the desired values without problems, I have it setup like this and it works without problems. I have only two ideas to solve your problem:
2015 Jul 10
2
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
Hi, I know there've been some workarounds on this topic, however I'm missing the reason for winbind to behave differently on a DC and on a member server (I also had to work around that problem and I'd really like it fixed). If there's a technical reason for it, it'd be nice to know about it. If there isn't, then it's just a bug that should be fixed. Could someone of
2015 Jul 02
0
Getent Differences on a DC and a Member Server
Hi David, I experienced this issue as well, it's currently a limitation of Samba 4.2.2. Samba 4.2.2 DCs do not support pulling home directories and login shells from AD via rfc2307. I solved this issue with the "template homedir" and "template shell" directives. You lose some flexibility but at least it works. Excerpt from my DC smb.conf: winbind nss info =
2015 Jul 02
0
Winbindd Strangeness [Solved]
On 01/07/15 03:30, samba-request at lists.samba.org wrote: > Message: 17 > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:30:52 +0100 > From: Rowland Penny<rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > To:samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Winbindd Strangeness > Message-ID:<5590F42C.8050002 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > On
2015 Oct 27
6
Bind DNS Issues
G'day All, I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. See below for named.conf. I'm having two issues. 1) After bind first starts up
2018 Mar 21
3
Replication Failure Issue
Thanks Carlos, The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have same problem after update for samba. > I allow new ports in firewall. > >
2018 Mar 21
1
Replication Failure Issue
G'day All, I have 4 DCs on Centos 7.1. Everything was working really well for years, including replication. Then I decided that the OS needed updating. Did the yum update on one of the DCs, rebooted. That server is now running Centos 7.4. Samba seemed to start okay. However, samba-tool drs showrepl gives this error on all 3 of the other DCs, and shows success on the updated DC.
2018 Nov 13
2
Samba-4.8.5 and SCCM-5.0 Problem Extending the Schema
G'day All, We are trying to set up SCCM-5.0. Our AD test is Samba-4.8.5. SCCM requires schema changes, and Samba is rejecting these. Anyone tackled this? Ideas on how to proceed? The output thrown by the SCCM exe (extadsch.exe) is: Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager v5.00 (Build 8634) Copyright (C) 2011 Microsoft Corp. Failed to extend the Active Directory schema. Your
2015 Oct 01
4
4th DC Unable to Replicate - WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED
G'day All, I've been setting up a new set of DCs, using 4.2.3 and all was going well until I tried to get a 4th DC going. I'm using bind_DLZ, and I think this is where I went wrong. I provisioned the new DC before having set up bind properly (I forgot to "yum install bind bind-util bind-libs") before hand. The provision worked okay, except that it told me
2015 Jul 03
0
Samba4.2.2 Bind9.9.4 Centos7 Issues
G'day All, I've got Samba4 using Bind for its DNS, and all seems to working well, except that I've noticed occasionally that bind either dies or locks up. I see the following in the my named.log file: 02-Jul-2015 21:54:08.859 database: critical: samba_dlz: talloc: access after free error - first free may be at ../lib/ldb/common/ldb.c:1592 02-Jul-2015 21:54:08.859 database:
2015 Oct 01
1
Replication Failing - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT
G'day Rowland, > On 29/09/15 15:30, David Minard wrote: >> I'm working on a brand new set of Samba DCs, as our University changed it's domain name, so we thought we'd start from scratch. Working on 4.2.3 at the moment. >> >> I finally got the new DC to join, but I had to wait until things got quiet (midnight-ish). >> >> > Getting confused now,
2013 Dec 11
2
samba-tool gpo aclcheck error
G'day Guys, We are running Centos 6.4, samba4.0.10, compiled from tgz. Has anyone come up with this one before? samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File
2018 Apr 12
1
Raising Domain Level
G'day All, We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2. I am referencing: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was 2003. However, when we try to raise further, we are getting what seems to be a
2018 Mar 21
0
Replication Failure Issue
Hai, Very important things are missing here in this one.. smb.conf Samba from sources or os provided? In case of last, centos 7.1 to 7.4 is samba 4.1.12 to 4.6.2 https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 Various packages have been rebased. Some of those are openLDAP, samba, .... And yes, as Carlos suggested, do check your firewalling also. Maybe samba didnt change but
2018 Mar 21
0
Replication Failure Issue
On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: > Thanks Carlos, > > The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > > >> On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have same problem