similar to: RPC server not available when windows client attempts to join samba AD

Hi, since 4.12 Samba SELinux context for /var/run/samba is not correct anymore: ``` root at files:~ # ls -la -Z /var/run/samba/ total 12 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 160 Apr 3 20:42 . drwxr-xr-x. 30 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 1000 Apr 3 18:39 .. drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 60 Apr 3 18:39 ncalrpc drwxr-xr-x. 2 root

On 3 Apr 2020, at 21:53, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 03/04/2020 20:34, Tobias Kirchhofer via samba wrote: >> Hi, since 4.12 Samba SELinux context for /var/run/samba is not >> correct anymore: >> >> ``` >> root at files:~ # ls -la -Z /var/run/samba/ >> total 12 >> drwxr-xr-x.? 5 root root system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0? 160 Apr 3 >>

Hi, I guess this is a bit OT but perhaps someone has encountered this issue before. On a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 box I have installed postfix and dspam from EPEL. Dspam is configured to listen on port 10026. After having configured dspam and postfix I start dspam and then postfix and I see the following AVC message in audit.log: type=AVC msg=audit(1350920492.936:400): avc: denied { name_bind }

Hi: I have been using Dovecot for well over a year now and it has always worked with few problems. The mail setup is not simple... Postfix+MailScanner+ClamAV+Docvecot+MySql+postfix.admin... just to mention the major things. The system is CentOS 5.3 on VMware. The maildir is on an NFS share, index and control is local. About a month ago I thought I upgraded from 1.1.x to 1.2.x. by doing an

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:39 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > What versions of systemd and samba on your Gentoo and Debian? Gentoo runs 230, Debian Jessie runs 215.

Darned thing is suddenly failing. We had a reboot last night, and I changed a couple of files today too, so either one could somehow be responsible. But I can''t figure out how from this crash. First I noticed that my changes weren''t updating. Then I noticed that puppet wasn''t running. Then I found that it won''t, in fact, run. /selinux contains only a

Am 12.07.2016 um 23:21 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > Am 12.07.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> Funny current debian service files use a wrong PIDFile path (should be >> /var/run/amba/samba.pid). >> >> If I use Type=forking and an wrong PIDFile systemctl start samba must be >> CTRL-C'ed. >> >> Type=notify works with or without an proper

I run a sshd host solely to allow employees to tunnel secure connections to our internal hosts. Some of which do not support encrypted protocols. These connections are chroot'ed via the following in /etc/ssh/sshd_config Match Group !wheel,!xxxxxx,yyyyy AllowTcpForwarding yes ChrootDirectory /home/yyyyy X11Forwarding yes Where external users belong to group yyyyy (primary). We

I have setup a Samba4 server and would like to report my experiences in the hope that it may be helpful to others. I basically followed the official Samba4 HowTo, which is very good. Based on what I have seen, this is the only document I would recommend people to follow. I will try not to repeat things that are covered in the HowTo, but rather focus on what I did differently or additionally,

Hi everyone, First off, I really don't know what to provide so please just ask what is needed. Here's what I think is relevant starting with a brief description: I have samba4 as AD DC for windows 10 clients. Roaming profiles are on a share on the DC and are working perfectly. However, redirected folder, also residing on the DC are not working as expected. I have yet to put my finger on

Ok, so there is not a problem with SElinux and Samba. But it is a pain to set up so it will work right. I finally figured out how to set up SE and Samba so you can be able to write and delete files. I found in one of that man pages "man samba_selinux", you can just disable SE for samba. I am sure there are other ways also but this is what I have found so far. I tried to just

Hi. I need to use the ntlm_auth module to auth. users so a group can use Internet and other not, using squid. The users that belong to "Internet" group may use Internet. I've being looking for info. about this but there is no much info. in google. Until now this is the only info. that I had found: for squid.conf: auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:32 AM Philippe LeCavalier < support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:43 AM Philippe LeCavalier < > support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > First off, I really don't know what to provide so please just ask what is > needed. Here's what I think is relevant starting with a brief description:

Good Day All I have been trying to upgrade from samba 3 to samba 4.2.1 on Ubuntu 14.4 using the sernet-samba package. the upgrade seems to work fine and the samba4 comes up correctlly, I have also run the following script to get rid of bug https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=blob_plain;f=source4/scripting/devel/chgtdcpass;h=4f5ea15a80c2862daf170a5657658a8163174f8a;hb=HEAD I am able to

Hi, The GUI screen visible in the browser has everything too small, can I adjust this _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

HI I have something in /var/log/audit/audit.log like: avc: denied { write } for pid=23739 comm="httpd" name="renderd.sock" dev=dm-0 ino=1183752 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file use audit2allow it generates something like this: allow httpd_t var_run_t:sock_file write; Is the rule too liberal?

Am 19.07.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:21:41 +0200 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 18.07.2018 um 14:17 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> > It is touched on here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Parameter_Explanation >

This question has already been asked in the past, but there was no answer. The above message is logged quite often in /var/log/samba/log.samba-dcerpcd. This is a stand-alone anonymous read-only server. Is it something to worry about? It smells like samba isn't working properly. If yes, how can I fix it? If no, how can I stop samba from logging un-interesting messages? What dcerpcd is

Am 19.07.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:33:46 +0200 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 19.07.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:21:41 +0200 >>> Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 18.07.2018 um

I recently setup my Puppetmaster server to run through Passenger via Apache instead of on the default webrick web server. SELinux made that not work and I've found some documentation on making rules to allow it however mine won't load. This is the policy I found via this website, http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/2012/01/20/selinux-passenger-and-puppet-oh-my/comment-page-1/ . module