similar to: SAMBA4 separate member and file server - Update

Hello Craig, Am 10.07.2015 um 17:11 schrieb Craig SHONE: > Freshly provisioned CentOS 6.6 DC, freshly provisioned CentOS > 6.6 member/file server. Logon scripts called login.bat, login.cmd > and login.vbs all in the netlogon share, all have the same function > of mapping network drives. > > Users can log in fine, can browse the file server, can browse the > netlogon >

Hi all Anyone having problems running logon scripts in 4.2.2? I've created a few test scripts (.bat, .vbs, etc) and placed them in the netlogon folder and then assigned some user accounts either the .bat or .vbs files using RSAT tools. Yet at login none of my client workstations (Windows XP, 7 or 8) execute their login scripts, none get mapped drives, etc. Browsing to the netlogon

Thanks for the response. I was more specifically looking through the source code for a place where Reaching Definitions was implemented to derive those uses and/or to generate the SSA. To provide some context, as a student I have a project to implement a path infeasibility algorithm to "Sharpen" the results of the Reaching Definitions results in LLVM. Being new to LLVM I wasn't

The immediate uses info provides reaching definitions already, at least while the code is in SSA form. So uh, what more are you looking for? 2009/3/17 Shone Sadler <shone.sadler at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > > I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some > direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is > being implemented

Hey everyone Have a (relatively) old CentOS SAMBA4 Active Directory running version 4.2.2, time to upgrade to the latest in the 4.2 series. As it's running as a VM on ESXI I have it backed up by VEEAM and I can take a snapshot before making any changes. Any major items to be aware of before upgrading to 4.2.13? Any reason I should not perhaps be looking a bit further to the 4.4.x

Colin Farrow <C.Farrow@geology.gla.ac.uk> writes: > Peter, > > Cautiously sticking my neck above the water line here. I have been > wondering about the Mac version for a while now. I may be able to get > an MSc IT student to work on this as a project for about 3 months > June-Sept. Before putting up the proposal some idea of the scale of the > task would be useful. Do

Hello, I am a newbie to LLVM as well as compilers and I am hoping for some direction in finding an instance of where a Reaching Definition Analysis is being implemented within LLVM. I have referenced the sources files, initially hoping to find an explicit ReachingDefinitionAnalysis.cpp file ;-) but with no such luck. Other than that I have found the files SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp and the

2009/3/17 Shone Sadler <shone.sadler at gmail.com>: > I was more specifically looking through the source > code for a place where Reaching Definitions was implemented to derive those > uses and/or to generate the SSA. mem2reg (llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp) transforms to SSA form, but that's the conventional SSA construction algorithm, which doesn't

Hello Craig, Am 07.07.2015 um 09:06 schrieb Craig SHONE: > Anyone having problems running logon scripts in 4.2.2? I can't confirm any problems. :-) > I've created a few test scripts (.bat, .vbs, etc) and placed them in the > netlogon folder and then assigned some user accounts either the .bat or .vbs > files using RSAT tools. Is this a new DC installation or are only the

All inquiries can be sent to me at lisa.shone@bluecoat.com As a Principal Engineer within the Network Infrastructure Group, this developer has a major role in the ongoing development of our networking facilities for Blue Coat's Proxy SG family of products. Current highlights include Blue Coat's industry leading development of IPv6 functionality as well as re-architecture of the

Connected to the stream just fine with the Winamp plugin & listened for about 20 min. A few dropouts & 1 disconnect - but I'm on a flaky DSL circuit this morning, so that's hardly unexpected. Winamp reported bitrates from 26-31 kb/s. The sound quality was very decent, given the bitrate. I noted a few artifacts in the 6-8 kHz range (cymbals & electric-guitar harmonics) on an

I am ''raking'' my brain to fix this problem - I have searched, googled, looked through rake documentation, wiki.rubyonrails and I can''t fix... This works $ rake plugindoc (in /home/craig/ruby-db/th-db) rdoc -o doc/plugins/ez_where --title ''Ez Where Plugin Documentation'' -- line-numbers --inline-source -T html

This conversation has (partially) moved on to D37896 now, but if possible I was hoping that we could perform this in DAGCombiner and remove the various target specific combines that we still have. At least ARM/AARCH64 and X86 have cases that can hopefully be generalised and removed, but there will probably be a few legality/perf issues that will occur. Simon. > On 14 Sep 2017, at 06:23,

I am currently improving the D37896 to include the suggestions from Chad. However, running the lit checks for the x86 backend I observe some changes in the generated MC, e.g.: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/lea-3.ll:13:10: error: expected string not found in input ; CHECK: leal ([[A0]],[[A0]],2), %eax ^ <stdin>:10:2: note: scanning from here orq %rdi, %rax ^ <stdin>:10:2:

Hi Sanjay, thanks for enlighten me on terms of tests. I assume I have to run the test-suite benchmarks to check for regressions? Is there a guide to get the metrics from the benchmarks? Cheers, Michael BTW the beginner tag for bugs was really a good idea to get started with contributing to llvm. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:58 PM +0200, "Sanjay Patel" <spatel at

Hi Craig, thanks for digging into this. So InstCombine is the wrong place for fixing PR34474. Can you give me a hint where such an optimization should go into CodeGen? I am not really familiar with stuff that happens after the MidLevel. Cheers, Michael Am 13.09.2017 um 19:21 schrieb Craig Topper: > And that is less instructions. So from InstCombine's perspective the > multiply is

I was getting same error when i keep both EVEX/EVEX_4V and TA. So, i restored my original instructions and for that i have to include bool HasTA = TSFlags & X86II::TA; in x86MCCodeEmitter.cpp then used this condition; if(HasTA) ++SrcRegNum; in order to emit binary correctly. Is it right? On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: >

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > virtual bar *foo() = 0; > > where foo() also exists as pure in the base class. Clang-modernize has a > FIXME that says it can't find the "=0" to do the insert of override. > Does that mean we have a pure virtual function with implementation in Clang/LLVM? If so, I feel it's a

Thank You, I changed TA to EVEX or EVEX_4V. But now i am getting following error: Invalid prefix! UNREACHABLE executed at /lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86MCCodeEmitter.cpp:647! On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Not all instructions can use EVEX_4V. Move instructions in particular > cannot because they don't have 2 sources. >

+Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> +tstellar at redhat.com <tstellar at redhat.com> for release thoughts.... On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 6:03 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I could tell, the only non-Intel contributions were from > mechanical API updates or fixing include paths when files moved to other > libraries for layering. > >