similar to: Database errors after join to DC as part of AD Forest

Hi I have multi domain environment with root domain and subdomain. Forest and domain level windows 2003 native. Also forest prep and domain prep did for sccm 2007 ocs 2007 and Exchange 2003. After join Samba to domain like ad dc I had some problem with replication: ################################################# [root at dc03 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dc02 dc03

> > Hi > > > > > > I have multi domain environment with root domain and subdomain. > > Forest and domain level windows 2003 native. > > > Also forest prep and domain prep did for sccm 2007 ocs 2007 and > > Exchange 2003. > > > > > > After join Samba to domain like ad dc I had some problem with > > replication: > >

Hi all, I'm wondering which version of Active Directory Samba4 can simulate. Of course we know Samba4 is not yet able to simulate the whole AD, things are still missing as Trust Relationship to name one, but for things which are working, until which version of Windows Server / AD can we compare Samba4 / AD? Hoping this question was clear enough... Thanks and regards, mathias

Hi, I believe some Neon code doesn't get invoked properly, because all PRESUME macros were set in my build. Probably not all optimized functions are called directly under iOS. Regards, Victor -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Lennox Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 11:59 AM To: Victor Cherepanov Cc: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] NEON detection under iOs On iOS, configure

Hi, Thank you for a great work. Opus codec works great under many platforms. I have found a small performance issue under iOS platform. If the macro OPUS_HAVE_RTCD is not set, then encoder doesn't use some _neon functions at low bitrates (up to 64k). If the macro is set, then the compiler hits the error at opus/celt/arm/armcpu.c:153 (a function for detection missed). Being compared to Android

I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and samba-4.3.6. But if I provision domain by command samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 --use-xattrs=yes I got error: Fixing provision GUIDs ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - pytalloc_reference_ex() called for

Hello Alexander, > Interesting topic. Is any such optimization reachable from C? Yes, I think so - both PassBuilder and PassManagerBuilder add MemCpyOpt & IPSCCP in the default pass pipeline. Juneyoung On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:43 PM Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root at openwall.com> wrote: > On 19/08/2020 06.05, Juneyoung Lee via llvm-dev wrote: > > LangRef isn't clear

Hello all, LangRef isn't clear about the value of padding when an aggregate value is stored into memory, and I'd like to suggest that storing an aggregate fills padding with undef. Here are a few clues that supports this change: - According to C17, the value of padding bytes when storing values in structures or unions is unspecified. - IPSCCP ignores padding and directly stores a

On 2016-05-20 19:58, David Majnemer via llvm-dev wrote: > I've come across this issue before and came to the following conclusion: > - We are not obligated to support objects that large, C11 5.2.4.1/1 only > requires that we support objects of size 65535! Right, the standard doesn't require it. But I guess you don't imply that it's fine for clang to silently miscompile

12.03.2016 17:57, Rowland penny пишет: >> What policy of using new version of libraries for stable version of >> Samba? Can I fix domain provision with talloc-2.1.6 for samba-4.3.6? >> > > Can I ask why you are building talloc separately ? If you build Samba > normally, it will be built for you. I am no expert here, but I think > Samba relies on the builtin version of

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root at openwall.com> wrote: > On 2016-05-20 19:58, David Majnemer via llvm-dev wrote: > >> I've come across this issue before and came to the following conclusion: >> - We are not obligated to support objects that large, C11 5.2.4.1/1 only >> requires that we support objects of size 65535! >> >

Try to build samba-4.0.23 (4.0.22 build without problems): http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/136130/build/100/x86_64/log There is error as described in "new" bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9515 [2720/2814] Generating manpages/smb.conf.5 ... (many validity errors like ID ABORTSHUTDOWNSCRIPT already defined) ... runtime error: file

I found the samba4 HOW-TO on the wiki and I have followed it to using Ubuntu server versions 11.10 and 10.04. I have been unsuccessful at step 4 running the provision script. I have run the following commands to get to get to this point: $ sudo git clone git://git.samba.org/samba.git samba-master; cd samba-master $ sudo apt-get install build-essential libattr1-dev libblkid-dev libgnutls-dev

Hi all; I successfully run samba 4 as DC. Joining win7 into it working, mobile profiles also. I used this tutorial: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO Because in my domain I will use few hundred acccounts I want to automate account creating in my domain. I would like to do that via bash script from linux side. I tried to create account via command: ./samba-tool user create demo8

Il giorno mar, 25/04/2017 alle 14.36 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > However I would like to enable also the DHCP service, and think > > it's right to activate it on this server. > > > > What is the best way to do so? > > Well you could always do it the way I have been doing it for the last > 5 years, see here: > >

I've come across this issue before and came to the following conclusion: - We are not obligated to support objects that large, C11 5.2.4.1/1 only requires that we support objects of size 65535! Their guidance for maximum object size is stated to be half of SIZE_MAX in C11 K.3.4/4 which is typically equivalent to PTRDIFF_MAX. - The expectation that PTRDIFF_MAX is more or less a proxy for the

It could be that 32-bit systems are disappearing so rapidly that nobody cares too much about this issue, but this blog post is still worth reading: http://trust-in-soft.com/objects-larger-than-ptrdiff_max-bytes/ John

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 12.07 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Is the DHCP server updating the records for you ? Yes, but for now the problem is not dhcp (see follow) > If so, you need to stop the windows clients trying to update their > own records, they don't own them. I have the problem when join to domani via samba on another server, or when I run

Dear all, what are the key strategies for intrusion prevention and detection with dovecot, apart from installing fail2ban? It is a pity that the IMAP protocol does not support 2 factor authentication, which seems to stop 90% of intrusion attempts in their tracks. Without it, if someone has obtained your password and reads your mail without modifying it, you will hardly ever notice. Is there a

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 11.29 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Try changing the 'options' of named.conf to this: Thanks Rowland Integrated your suggested changes and restart samba and named Now my named.conf is this[1], but none is change: [ root at server-addc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names --fail-immediately update failed: REFUSED dic 04