similar to: Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?

Hello Min Wai Chan, ? Can you explain more about,, the DC1 will remove any emptey directory on DC1. tested it here, but that does not occure here. i can create empty directories on DC1, and these are synced to DC2. empty or not. ? ?DC1 will overwrite any users/group change on DC2? if setup correctly, your sysvol rights on DC1 and DC2 are the same.. ? i suggest you to the following. get the

Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

Hai Min Wai Chan, i'll go have a look in osync.. and how do you mean fixour issue? Can you explain more so i can have a look into that. which version are you running.. latest is : 2015-04-30: 1.0.6 these where the last changes : # 2014-05-02: 1.0 : im considering this stable, but use at own risk. # 2014-05-09: 1.01 : missed sysvol in the cron line. ( sysvol-sync ) # 2014-06-23: 1.02

Hello, Just to share I've updated the guide to use osync. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Enjoy Regards, Min Wai On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Belle, > > That produce the similar situation. > > Thus I'm trying osync > > And the result are much present according to my test

Hai Min Wai Chan, ? I have tested it as shown in your example, and your correct. I?did a few test, but im very buzy atm. Few things i noticed. ? ? I?compaired the rights in linux and these are the same, but when i look at the rights in windows, these are different.. :-/ but wait.. Sync DC1 => DC2 , files and folder rights are ok, in windows and in linux Sync DC2 => DC1, files and

Just some notes: For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster filesystem. I have no idea how far this is supported w/ samab (ACLs, ...) Maybe a old tool related to drbd might be worth some testing too: http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/ Klaus ________________________________________ Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [samba-bounces at

2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > Dear Daniel, Klaus > > I've try that before > But because of how samba work on the files. > > The Advise is No > Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... > > > Maybe i'm wrong, but we are talking about the sysvol and the databases are out that folder. Sysvol only have the

Dear Louis, I think I found something interesting on the script... https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Let say we removed the "--delete-after" which caused DC2 folder to be removed on the next sync... It seem that the location of the folder are part of the cause. If it is the 3rd or above... on the folder we sync... /AD.DOMAIN.NET/Policies/YourNewfolder

Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greeting, ~ I've setup my Red Hat 7.3 With samba 2.2.5 to be a PDC. Which at the same time, I'm having the same problem like *problems on windows part <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103675771200004&r=1&w=2>*. Accessing from windows to Linux always not a problem. But I'm having a problem to access it reverse. (from Linux

Dear All, I've some strange entry on my getent as shown below. It seem that There are some strange value UID/GID 4294967295 <-- what number is this? I get this info from my Domain member which serving as a files server. Also some different GID from Samba AD DC E.g wbinfo from AD DC (default configuration after classical migratation) --> AD DC have no winbind configuration. wbinfo

Hey Samba team - Thanks for all your work I have three production samba 4 DCs 2 running on Ubuntu 16.04 (Samba 4.4.5 and 4.4.4) and one on 14.04 (Samba 4.3.3) all working well for the most part. However to keep everything in sync I setup osync for syncing Sysvol. As recent conversations on the list indicate following the sync operation I lose access to sysvol until I run 'samba-tool

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, I''m a bit confused on the rules and would like your help. I''ve 4 NIC, eth0 --> WAN (net) eth1 --> OSPF1 (bb1) eth2 --> OSPF2 (bb2) I would like to enable all the icmp function (ping and traceroute) Wonder what effect will the following policy make. bb0 all ACCEPT info bb1

On 10/4/2016 11:22 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > See inline comments: > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:44:07 -0400 > Bob Thomas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hey Samba team - Thanks for all your work >> >> I have three production samba 4 DCs 2 running on Ubuntu 16.04 (Samba >> 4.4.5 and 4.4.4) and one on 14.04 (Samba 4.3.3) all

I agree, If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it would be easy... However, it seem that they have something else running under samba/nfs to control the permission on the files/folder... I would like to use bidir sync because I like some of the synology feature on remote sync and etc which is making remote access much easier compare to samba... But these sync

Dear all, Would need some of your advise. As I was the trying to get postfix sasl working with samba AD. I've try to search online for a few examples some use ldap, kerberos or pam. I'm using winbind on that system and I wonder if we can use winbind with sasl. Or anyone have a more correct on how it should be done. My existing setup was working with ldap before moving to samba4.

In the Samba wiki page "Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround". The FAQ "What to do if I've more than one DC?" Should not the last line say "DC3 <> DC2" like this: - DC1 <> DC2 - DC1 <> DC3 - DC3 <> DC2 <<<<??? Bob Wooden