similar to: OT: suggestion need on Sync in the windows way.

I agree, If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it would be easy... However, it seem that they have something else running under samba/nfs to control the permission on the files/folder... I would like to use bidir sync because I like some of the synology feature on remote sync and etc which is making remote access much easier compare to samba... But these sync

Hi Sebastien, Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? Thank you. S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org> ? 2015?6?15? ?????? > Hi > > rsync -a should be able to perform chown using usernames rather than uids > so your files would still be owned by the right user. > > Regards > > Le 14/06/2015 16:48, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > >> Dear

Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >

For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-06-15 01:04, Min Wai Chan wrote: > I agree, > If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it > would be easy... > However, it seem

Mount wontt be a solution since you'll force things to one uid/gid Why do you need bidir sync? Le 14/06/2015 20:01, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > Hi Sebastien, > > Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? > > Thank you. > > S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org> ? 2015?6?15? ?????? > >> Hi >> >> rsync -a should be able to

Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The

Hi everyone, On a server running Debian 9, I have multiple KVM guests automatically started at boot by libvirtd.service and running in the background. When I shutdown this server, libvirtd.service automatically and gracefully shut them all down first. So, every thing is fine so far. Recently, I've added an additional KVM guest and this one does not respond to a shutdown command from virsh

Dear Sébastien, Sorry for the delay, Please check on the log below. As for the word "存取被拒。" it should translate to Access Deny... Please help. - <Event xmlns="*http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event <http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event>*"> - <System> <Provider Name="*Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy*"

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: > I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent > or received to the server. > > Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. > > Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified mount.cifs. > > When I send utf-8 it gets received as dos. > > "é" for instance is #c3a9 in utf-8, and

Roger, I just ran a manual test, killing power and see what happens.  I set the Synology “Time before DiskStation goes into Safe mode” to 5 minutes so I didn’t have to wait like an hour until it powered down.  Here is the log: https://hastebin.com/ovuwilufeb.sql Everything appeared to be normal; the servers powered off and the Synology went into safe mode.  Power was then cut to the Synology

How would I capture with Wireshark when it seemingly happens at random?  Whenever I test, everything appears to work normally.  I wish I could somehow replicate it.  Maybe I need to test manually and see if it’ll happen in front of me; I’ve never actually seen it happen… always happens when I’m away. -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 2, 2020, 12:12 PM -0400, Manuel Wolfshant

I'm hoping that someone can shed some light on this… I have a Synology NAS (DS416) that has a feature where you can enable a “Network UPS Server” which is a NUT server.  I have been trying to get the Synology to shut down three Ubuntu 20.04 servers that I have. While it does work when I test it out manually, sometimes when I am away and the power goes out briefly, the servers shut down when

OK , but then the solution with symlinks is equivalent, just with the right options for rsync. Make the link. Sync + exclude. Remove the link. Don't have to live with the folder on the source. *_______________Gionata Boccalini* 2015-06-08 22:49 GMT+02:00 Michael Johnson - MJ <mj at revmj.com>: > Oh, actually, I just thought of a couple other another options that don't >

Hi List, i've installed the network ups tool on one of my windows machine (server 2012 r2). My ups is an APC Back-UPS Pro 550 which is connected via USB to an Synology Diskstation DS414. I found this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l54n_37M_k My config: *nut.conf* MODE=standalone *ups.conf* [ups] driver = snmp-ups port = 192.168.2.5 community = public *upsd.users* [monuser]

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

Hi, I have some weird issue I don't know how to tackle. When I share a folder from a Unix (Linux) machine using a current version of Samba (smbd) and I mount it on an older Synology (2.6.32) the reading of files goes fine. However all files I create get the chacacters #EF80AF affixed to the filename, which is a Unicode code point for private extensions, or something of the kind.

> I see upsd and the first upsmon are running as "root". They are often run as user "nut" or "upsd?. Apparently Synology has implemented it standard like this. Upsmon.conf on the Synology NAS: RUN_AS_USER root I suppose this needs to be changed from a security point of view. > I don't know the Synology NAS, but I guess that unless it is shutdown