similar to: considering additonal server software

Oops, sent it to Louis directly. My bad. See conclusion below. -------- Original Message -------- SUBJECT: Re: [Samba] Member server losing smb connection [solved] DATE: 2016-11-14 10:22 FROM: Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob at donelsontrophy.net> TO: "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> REPLY-TO: bob at donelsontrophy.net On 2016-11-14

On 2016-11-14 08:39, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Is this on a windows 7 or 10 client or both? > Are you useing \\FQ.DN\share or \\hostname\share > Try the FQ.DN, as Microsoft advices. > > And where are the TLS parameters in the below config. > Did you set this up? > > Greetz, > > Louis > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van:

You are correct. I discovered (a few minutes ago) that /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-wheezy-sernet.list had the duplicate line within it. Funny thing was, when I "comment out" the duplicate line, that "commented out" the single entry within the file. All other lines were already 'commented out'. So, after 'apt-get update' ran without error, I went back and

At one point, I thought the same. Tried a "sleep 5" and still got some failures. (That was before I started counting the fails.) This is a P4 3.2Ghz with 1Gb RAM. Could it be that sluggish (at that moment) and need a "sleep 10" or "sleep 15" or more? It worked on my VM (of course it is running on a multi-core Xeon processor so maybe a sleep?) I'm going to try

Okay!!! My member server ip address is 192.168.**.56 (static). When I run your command it is reporting the ip address of 192.168.**.55 (which is my DC02 address.) So, I need to correct this. How do I remove the 'old member server' ip address 192.168.**.55 reference and correct to 192.168.**.56? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main)

On 08/01/15 19:10, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Part of the smb.conf > > [home] > path = /home/samba/DTDC01/users > comment = user folder 4 redirection > read only = no > > Hum-m-m? > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy > > 615.885.2846 (main) > www.donelsontrophy.com [1] > >

Part of the smb.conf [home] path = /home/samba/DTDC01/users comment = user folder 4 redirection read only = no Hum-m-m? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-08 12:56, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 08/01/15 18:37, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > First, I keep

That was a cut/paste error. I've been thinking (danger, danger) when I test kerberos it returns the two DC's are available. Should it be including the member server also? Didn't I see the script setup kerberos on the member server? (Remember this was installed with the gen one scripts, not the newest scripts.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy

Rowland, I think you have confused my email with a different thread. Uhm . . what? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-29 07:30, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/01/15 12:54, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > Rowland, I have tried your various alteration

I will add here that my server provisioned yesterday afternoon. However, I did not have time to do any testing. So, this morning testing and the first thing I discovered was "sernet-samba-ad" service was NOT running. I found a Debian Wheezy sernet samba posting (via Google) and within it read that users need to edit "/etc/default/sernet-samba" as follows: # ---- SETUP

On 13/02/15 19:48, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Thank you, Rowland. > > Copied your simpler ntp.conf file into my member server. Made the > appropriate changes. Restarted all the ntp service on all machines (just > in case.) Ran 'ntpq -p' (on member server) and got the correct answer. > Proper connection to DC's. > --- > >

I am building a 64bit machine for a DC (CentOS 7) following the instructions on the Samba wiki. Installed Samba 4.3.1.tar.gz and when I try to provision the domain I get: ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - operations error at ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c:2241 Search the string and it is bug 11573 (assigned to Andrew.) I realize that he will work on it when he gets time

No. What I did was change the first few to see what happens. And still the first 13 (this time, last time 17) failed. I am baffled why the first 11 to 17 fail (randomly) and the remainder receive "Successfully granted rights." --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On

Thank you. This helps get me closer. One machine shows rsync 3.0.9 and the other shows rsync 3.1.0. Running "rsync --version" both show "ACL, xattr" are supported. Two questions, would the two different version cause it to fail? Second, does the order rsync "receives" the switches matter. Does "-A" and "-X" need to be near the beginning of

On 27/02/15 20:08, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > No. > > What I did was change the first few to see what happens. And still the > first 13 (this time, last time 17) failed. I am baffled why the first 11 > to 17 fail (randomly) and the remainder receive "Successfully granted > rights." > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden

Rowland, The email here is a little crazy at the moment. Your reply to my email sent this morning (7 or 8 hours ago) just popped up. And this is since you I have emailed some more confusion. This thread is on HOLD UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. Let's let the email world settle down. I am currently receiving emails from this morning and I am confused. And let get my head around all that we have

W7 client domain member? yes. Logged in as domainAdministrator? yes. "SeDiskOperatorPrivilege" set? yes Read "/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs"? yes. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [2] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-28 10:40, Marcel de Reuver wrote: >

Hai Bob. SETDNSDOMAIN='hostname -d' needs to be: SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` .. so change them all . SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` SETHOSTNAME=`hostname -s` SERVER_IP_ADDRESS=`hostname -i` and you can ignore : >[....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: >127.0.0.1#953: connection refused > >. ok > >[ ok ] Starting domain name service...:

and you didnt find my scripts ;-) https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ The wheezy scripts should work also on ubuntu. It all in there what you want to know. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bob at donelsontrophy.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Donelson Trophy >Verzonden: zondag 7 december 2014 16:41 >Aan: SAMBA MailList

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your reply. We tried successfully the --full-sync option from first to second DC. Unfortunately, afterwards the second DC was still in a corrupted state. The "Deleted Objects" still contained the ugly groups with the missing attribute... So we achieved to get a successfull replication after editing the "deleted objects" with ldbedit. We have deleted