similar to: File copy operation blocks on Samba share

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "File copy operation blocks on Samba share"

2015 Jun 10
0
File copy operation blocks on Samba share
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:40:18AM -0500, Andrew Martin wrote: > Hello, > > I am running a server with cifs-utils 6.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 trusty with a CIFS > mount as follows: > //server/share /mnt/Share cifs >
2014 Jan 15
3
extlinux device trouble
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Johann Obermayr > <johann.obermayr at sigmatek.at> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> i'm using version 4.07. >> On my computer extlinux does not work. >> after debugging, i found the trouble. >> >> in the function parse_mountinfo there
2014 Jan 14
2
extlinux device trouble
Hello, i'm using version 4.07. On my computer extlinux does not work. after debugging, i found the trouble. in the function parse_mountinfo there was using a function get_string. in the function get_string there was a line (42) } else if (ch == '\\') { but in my mountinfo list, there was \ , but not with octal digit. so the function get_string will fail. here are some information
2014 Jan 15
1
extlinux device trouble
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Johann Obermayr <johann.obermayr at sigmatek.at> wrote: > Am 15.01.2014 04:57, schrieb Gene Cumm: > >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Johann Obermayr >>> <johann.obermayr at sigmatek.at> wrote: >>>>
2018 Jun 25
1
works with 4.7.6, fails with 4.8.2: echo > $(mktemp /mnt/XXXXXX)
Hi, I have a regression test suite that creates this simple share: [tmp] comment = Temp Directory guest ok = Yes path = /tmp read only = No This is mounted via SMB1: mount //localhost/tmp -o guest,vers=1.0 /mnt The client (ubuntu 18.10 dev) is using cifs-utils 2:6.8-2 from debian (it's a sync). Client and server are the same machine (localhost). When the server is
2024 Jan 30
1
permission denied with windows acls
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>
2018 Apr 26
2
Character encoding mystery
Hi everyone, I have a very annoying character encoding problem. Have a look to this: # ls -l M*mo-1.* -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8417218 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.aif -rwxr--r-- 1 hope hope 8417218 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.aif -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 363175 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.m4a -rwxr--r-- 1 hope hope 363175 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.m4a Yes, it looks like two files have exactly the same name, but
2024 Jan 30
1
permission denied with windows acls
On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in >> windows >> >> root at fs1:/var/log# cd /data >> root at fs1:/data# mkdir -m 1777 test2 > No it doesn't, you are setting
2019 Apr 29
2
permission denied while compile linux kernel on samba share
Hi, I have no issues uncompressing Linux kernel tarball on the samba share but getting Permission denied while compilation. What could cause this issue? init/calibrate.o: Permission deniedinit/calibrate.o: failedmake[1]: *** [init/calibrate.o] Error 1make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CC fs/autofs/inode.ofs/autofs/init.o: Permission deniedfs/autofs/init.o: failedmake[2]: ***
2015 Nov 25
2
"Failed to start domain..."
Sadly, I'm back with another issue. I can do a "system list --all" just fine; however, if I attempt to start the machines, I get back: maas@Bill-MAAS-cc:~$ strace -s 1024 -f -o /tmp/asdfasdf.log virsh -c vbox+ssh://gbadmin@10.20.0.1/system start PXE-client-07 error: Failed to start domain PXE-client-07 error: An error occurred, but the cause is unknown Log files on both client
2015 Jan 06
1
Symbolic links not visible on osx 10.10
Since I do not see my last messages in the samba mail archive (I replied myself), here's the last one I sent with some more information (so hopefully they arrive now for everybody?): I just found out this is not only happening on the osx clients by mounting the share on the server: All this below happens on an linux arch server mounting the own share: mount //ip.addr/Programs ./tmp -o
2015 Jan 23
4
No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?
Hello, I am using Samba version 4.2.0rc4-GIT-4701d74. When using a connection in protocol smb2 or smb3, the unix client says symlinks are not supported, for example: # mount //ip.addr/Programs ./tmp -o vers=3.0 # cd tmp # ln -s bla blub ln: failed to create symbolic link ?blub?: Operation not supported # mount //ip.addr/Programs on /mnt/tmp type cifs
2019 Nov 06
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
hi Stefan / all, resurrecting this thread ? On 9/26/19 9:19 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem > the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the > last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a > new kernel root at plattentest:~# uname -a Linux plattentest
2015 Nov 30
1
Re: "Failed to start domain..."
> This means there was an error (some function returned -1), but the > error message was not set. Could you capture the backtrace when this > happens? It's hard to find the exact point, but going function and > checking what returns -1 should do. Assuming by "backtrace" you mean the strace output, I went to the end of the file, and then did a reverse search for -1; here
2015 Jan 05
1
Symbolic links not visible on osx 10.10
Hi Ralph, On 05.01.15 15:00, Ralph B?hme wrote: >> [Programs] >> path = /server/shares/programs >> valid users = some users >> read only = No >> force create mode = 0660 >> force directory mode = 0770 >> vfs objects = fruit # tried without fruit vfs, no change > > on first reading I thought this sound
2010 Nov 05
4
xe cli not working on remote machine
Hi list, I have 3 Citrix Xenserver 5.6  and currently building a a VM backup server. I took the xe client on one of the server and installed it on the backup server (gentoo based) installed the stunnel package to make XE work. now when running, I get this error message : [server ­~ #] ./xe help -debug -s 192.168.111.17 -u user -pw pass Connecting via stunnel to [192.168.111.17] port [443]
2023 Mar 09
3
CIFS client mounts meta ops 30 times slow than server
Hi Samba users, We would like to use samba for re-exporting our other distributed file system (BeeGFS). However, we found that the meta data operations are very slow (dir stat, removal etc.). On SMB client the performance is more than 30x slow than on the SMB server. We would expect some slowness but this is too big a drop. This is the result on CIFS client $ sudo mdtest -b 10 -I 10 -L -z 2
2014 Jan 15
0
extlinux device trouble
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Johann Obermayr <johann.obermayr at sigmatek.at> wrote: > Hello, > > i'm using version 4.07. > On my computer extlinux does not work. > after debugging, i found the trouble. > > in the function parse_mountinfo there was using a function get_string. > in the function get_string there was a line (42) } else if (ch == '\\') {
2014 Jan 15
0
extlinux device trouble
Am 15.01.2014 04:57, schrieb Gene Cumm: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Johann Obermayr >> <johann.obermayr at sigmatek.at> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> i'm using version 4.07. >>> On my computer extlinux does not work. >>> after debugging, i
2019 Sep 25
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
hi there, running a simple test like time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo hello > world-$s; done takes a little more than a minute on a locally mounted test share on our samba server. the same test finishes in about 5 seconds when it is run on the server's file system, without samba. i understand that dealing with many small files isn't exactly the sweet spot of any (networked) file