similar to: using the DC as a file Server in AD

Sernet Samba 4.1.17 on CentOS 7.1503 running on older hardware - Dell PowerEdge 2950 with 2 x Xeon cpu's and 16GB RAM. AD DC and file server all in one. Approximately 50 domain users and 50 computers. No problems to report. I'm learning to be very deliberate with changing posix and windows acl's so I don't disturb users' access to files and folders. I check acl's on a

You'll get problems with file permissions. I've learned that you won't be able to just give a user access to a file without also giving him read access to every folder, down from the root of the share, that the file is located in. Example: You can't give accounting access to \\samba\IT\management\budget.ods without also giving them rights to \\samba\IT and \\samba\IT\management.

Hi, there is a recommendation in the Samba AD DC howto: "We do not recommend using the Domain Controller as a file Server." We have two sites. We have two Samba3 servers now with ldap on site1, and one Samba3 BDC on site2. We have ~200 users, and around 50 clients connect to the servers at the same time on site1, and around 20 clients connect to the BDC on site2. On the BDCs there are

Dear R-experts, I have a table with following collumns: State, SamplePlot, Species and BodySize. I sampled bird species at 34 SamplePlots and 5 States (regions) monthly during two years. On each bird record I measured bodysize and identified the species. So I have many records of each species (about 150 species) at each SamplePlot and each Region (State). Now I would like bootstrap

Dear R-friends, Unfortunately the tables that I "past" on last email gone with bad visual structure. So I send it again. Sorry to do this so confuse. Miltinho ==== Table1 - Bird records State,SampleSite,Species,Bodysize SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp01,4.39 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp04,4.05 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp01,2.75 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp02,8.18 SaoPaulo,Site1,Spp02,0.80

g''day all, I need help with this please. I have a dataset of site names and years they were trapped in (a subset of it is bs, below) and a dataset of sites that actually caught animals (subsetted as brep, below). I need to add to brep, a row with a zero in the classcount column, for every year each site was trapped but caught nothing. so for Site 1, I need to add rows that say

Hello, I'm running a few tests here with two locations. site1: server-site1.gsg.local subnet 192.168.200.0/24 site2: server-site2.gsg.local subnet 192.168.190.0/24 both are connected via VPN. I migrated an samba3 domain at server-site1 it gets Default-First-Site-Name assigned. Then I joined the new samba4 domain withe server-site2. Both servers work and i can join and access them with

I am trying to use the function gl (generate levels), and would like to make levels with different number of replications. Does anyone know how to generate different number of replications in each level? Something like: [1] Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 Site1 [8] Site2 Site2 Site2 Site2 Site2 Thanks in advance -- Rog?rio R. Silva MZUSP http://www.mz.usp.br Linux/Debian User # 354364

hii guys i have some issue with dns in samba 4 i have install and setup 2 samba dc in different Site site2 dc joint to site1 dc, with internal dns topology : site1 --- openvpn server --- firewall --- wan --- openvpn client --- site2 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 in site1 i have some application let say email server: mail.local.lan > 192.168.1.2 web server : web.local.lan > 192.168.1.3

I'm designing a system where some but not all groups of users want to share a single mailbox, i.e the user will not have there own inbox. I think this is possible by setting up a user database that returns the same mail location and possible the same home directory. This sharing would only occur in a single domain. Example User Database UserID | home | mail all at site1.example.com |

I am attempting to join several dataframes that summarize sampling effort for different samples into one large data.frame/table. I have looked at the merge command, but have not been clever enough to figure out how to get it to do what I want. A simplified example of what I am trying to do: The dataframes I have look like this (they were generated using the table command) species1.effort

Hello, I'd like to transpose data to create an analysis-friendly dataframe. See below for an example, I was unable to use t(x) and I couldn't find a function with options like PROC TRANSPOSE in SAS. The ideal solution handles variable quantities of SITE - but beggars can't be choosers. :-) Thank you in advance, Mike ## INPUT DATA USER_ID<-c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4) SITE

The combination of survfit, coxph, and factors is getting confused. It is not smart enough to match a new data frame that contains a numeric for sitenew to a fit that contained that variable as a factor. (Perhaps it should be smart enough to at least die gracefully -- but it's not). The simple solution is to not use factors. site1 <- 1*(coxsnps$sitenew==1) site2 <-

Hello R list, I have a list of data frames, in the form (dump output for an example list follows message): $site1 year data 1 2000 0.03685042 2 2001 0.02583885 6 2005 0.02480015 7 2006 0.03458745 $site2 year data 1 2002 4.071134e-03 2 2003 -4.513524e-08 3 2004 8.336272e-08 4 2005 2.270803e-08 5 2006 1.263597e-02 6 2007 NaN I would like to plot each

Hello, I'm using the rmeta package to perform a meta analysis using summary statistics rather than raw data, and would like to analyze the effects in three different subgroups of my data. Furthermore, I'd like to plot this on one forest plot, with corresponding summary weighted averages of the effects displayed beneath each subgroup. I am able to generate the subgroup analyses by simply

The simplest would be to convert precip to character and then back to a factor if you really want it to be a factor. This will also remove the levels that no longer exist. str(dat) # 'data.frame': 5 obs. of 3 variables: # $ Sites : Factor w/ 5 levels "Site1","Site2",..: 1 2 3 4 5 # $ temp : num 14 15 12 12.5 17 # $ precip: Factor w/ 5 levels

> >> Current plan : add a third DC, make dc2 a dm file server. Best solution > > imo. > > Yes, I know that it would be better to use a separate dc, but I didn't > > want it on that site. > Hi Pisch, that wasn't aimed at you, but it does show why you should > never hijack an existing thread, my fault for not forking it off into a > new thread, sorry ;-)

On 12/04/16 22:21, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > > On 12 April 2016 at 07:31, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>> wrote: > > The schema is in another NC, so use the 'cross-ncs' switch to see > the schema. > > > Thanks Rowland - adding --cross-ncs worked and I can now see the > schema extensions using

Hello. I want to test a multi-site setup w/ replication to a central DC only. In a test scenario I have set up a central samba4 DC (sernet-samba 4.1.12-9). For provisioning I have used the --site=central, so no Default-First-Site-Name has been created on provisioning, just 'central'. In AD Site & Services I have unchecked the "Bridge all site links" in "Inter-Site

I''d like to create a component that takes different actions based on the classes associated with the node using the component. Is this possible? Here''s what I''m thinking. node www01 { include webserver website { "site1.com": aliases => ["www.site1.com", "test.site1.com"], username => www0001 } } node www02 { include