similar to: samba4.2 AD DC and Sites

Hello, I'm running a few tests here with two locations. site1: server-site1.gsg.local subnet 192.168.200.0/24 site2: server-site2.gsg.local subnet 192.168.190.0/24 both are connected via VPN. I migrated an samba3 domain at server-site1 it gets Default-First-Site-Name assigned. Then I joined the new samba4 domain withe server-site2. Both servers work and i can join and access them with

On 12/30/2014 10:55 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello David, > > Am 30.12.2014 um 00:26 schrieb David Bear: >> The big question is could the sites and services tool have triggered some >> bug in samba ? So much time has elapse I don't see that it is possible to >> go back and trouble shoot that way we should. >> >> I'm just wondering if there are any

My answer below. 2016-02-10 15:38 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 10/02/16 14:07, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> >> >> 2016-02-10 14:37 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org <mailto: >> rpenny at samba.org>>: >> >> >> On 10/02/16 11:12, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>

2016-02-10 16:54 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 10/02/16 15:36, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> My answer below. >> >> 2016-02-10 15:38 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org <mailto: >> rpenny at samba.org>>: >> >> On 10/02/16 14:07, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >> >> >>

2016-02-10 14:37 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 10/02/16 11:12, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Using 4.3.4 + Bind DLZ @ Centos 7. >> >> Regarding AD sites, I have several questions: >> >> 1° Is it possible with Samba4 to rename Default-First-Site-Name? >> > > Depends on what you mean, if you mean

Hello, I published a new documentation about how to setup sites and subnets in Active Directory: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Sites Regards, Marc

Hello, Reading about, specifically in the wiki <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Sites> link, says the following about subnets. "Create a subnet entry for all subnets in your network and assign them to a site:" The subnet on which our DCs are configured is a public IP block, but the client machines are in a subnet with a private address block. Do I need to

OK, fair point... perhaps I wasn't clear enough, this happens a lot... probably my brain just operates on a different wavelength.... in my original message I said "what method does it use to decide which is the correct (most local?) domain controller to connect to" The answer I got was "it uses sites, you need to set up sites"... the answer I was hoping for was one of

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

> Obviously there is something wrong with the dns updates on DC2. Any > ideas? > > Tom > >The problem is (as far as I understand it), you cannot write to an >RODC, it forwards write actions to a writeable DC, which then replicates >them back. >From the above, it is timing out, is there a firewall or similar in the >way ? Can you ping a DC from the RODC ? >

Hi list, I recently realized that using multiple DC has a major drawback when using Samba In my understanding, in a classical AD environment, sysvol share is supposed to be a DFS share. This means that proximity rules are applied when accessing to it. When using samba it seems that we face a classical round-robin DNS, which can lead to the situation where a machine on site A tries to fetch

Good morning :) Am 04.01.2024 um 20:17 schrieb lists--- via samba: > Am 04.01.2024 um 13:28 schrieb lists--- via samba: >> Am 04.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:12:57 +0100 >>> lists--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 04.01.2024 um 11:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:

Hi, We have encountered these timeout issues with Samba 4.7 as an RODC too. We created a ticket about it here : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 One thing is that even after the timeouts got resolved, I still get a weird behaviour with two entries that keeps trying to update themselves when I run "samba_dnsupdate". The call succeeds, but the entries are actually

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

Hello! I've followed your tutorial to change the IP Address of our Samba AD DC: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_IP_Address_of_a_Samba_AD_DC But the samba_dnsupdate tool always crashes with this output: samba_dnsupdate --verbose Unknown parameter encountered: "ks" Ignoring unknown parameter "ks" IPs: ['192.168.68.201'] Looking for DNS entry A

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

Hi, The smb.conf is the default after the upgrade: cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = TTU realm = ttu.red netbios name = PDC interfaces = lo, eth0 bind interfaces only = Yes server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind, ntp_signd, kcc,

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:04:20 +0200 (CEST) tomict via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > OK, I have checked from Windows and my dns looks like this: > > DC2-| > > |- Forward Lookup Zone > > |- samdom.example.com > > You have much more dc2 entries, I only have 4 from my manual > additions. Your dns setup is the same as the setup that

Thanks for the answer ligpanda101!! For DC's that are not present on a subnet, assign the subnet to the closet > site to a DC Visibly via RSAT, how would that look? On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:06 PM lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/27/2018 11:44 AM, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Reading about, specifically in the wiki

On 10/02/16 16:27, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2016-02-10 16:54 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>>: > > On 10/02/16 15:36, mathias dufresne wrote: > > My answer below. > > 2016-02-10 15:38 GMT+01:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>