similar to: Clients unable to get group policy...

Sorry for the delay, I have been out of town. Your hunch was correct, Rowland. Both getent and id only return local machine accounts, not domain accounts. What have I overlooked which would cause this? I do have winbind in my PAM configuration. James, it has worked for a few years. It recently (in the last year) started having workstations report being unable to access the gpt.ini files. The

When I do an gpupdate /force a wrong url is used. \\foo\SysVol\foo\Policies\{89E....}\gpt.ini ON my dc the path (in explorer) is \\dc1\sysol\foo\Policies\{89E....}\gpt.ini or \\dc1.foo\sysol\foo\Policies\{89E....}\gpt.ini whats wrong?

Colleagues, I come to seek help to solve this problem. I use Samba 4.4.5. I'm getting errors when running gpupdate / force on local desktops. I get the following error: User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encountered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not apply the registry-based policy settings for the Group Policy object

Hi here are the commands in the order I ran them: root at dc1:~ # systemctl stop samba root at dc1:~ # net cache flush root at dc1:~ # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset root at dc1:~ # net cache flush root at dc1:~ # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck root at dc1:~ # systemctl start samba root at dc1:~ # smbclient //localhost/sysvol -UAdministrator -c 'ls' Enter Administrator's password:

Hi root at dc1:~ # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes ...some error information... Checked 3647 objects (2 errors) root at dc1:~ # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix Checking 3647 objects Checked 3647 objects (0 errors) root at dc1:~ # getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

The principle was not made any changes to occur this problem. We infra have dc3 and dc4 ADDC. root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V Version 4.7.7-Debian (van-blle apt) Result of gpupdate /force in a joined computer client: C:\>gpupdate /force > Updating Policy... > User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were > encountered: > The processing of Group Policy

I have Samba 4.5.3 working fine as an AD DC and DNS provider. I now need to set up a group policy on the DC but I am having problems with the internal sysvol and netlogon shares. Via the Windows Group Policy Manager snap-in I successfully created a GPO specifying the DC as the primary time source for all clients, using the Administrator user ...but my windows domain test client

Hello, i configured group policy via RSAT in my samba 4.1.13 implementation the policy applies correctly to my windows 7 clients but not to my windows XP clients. when i run gpupdate /force in windows XP it replies that the policies are apply correctly .... when i run ./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -

I hate 'me too' replies - but I have also been struggling with this for some years in my multi-DC environment. (yes, replicated sysvol via lsyncd + rsync; permissions looked identical via getfacl last time I checked). Sometimes a client machine will run gpupdate just fine; other times it will fail, seemingly randomly. My next step was going to be to run wireshark on a client machine to

I have a small AD forest of two Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers. I would like to add a Samba 4 DC to this forest. After running into some problems with group policies, I realized that Samba 4 does not currently implement file replication. I would like to have the Samba 4 domain controller replicate user/computer schema with the Windows machines, but I would like for DNS and group policy

Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The

Good morning Chris > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sonic [mailto:sonicsmith at gmail.com] > Verzonden: dinsdag 27 oktober 2020 21:07 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO fail and sysvol perm errors > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:01 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version > Version 4.5.8-Debian > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error" > no error > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory

ok, I've investigated the problem more closely. First of all, I didn't mention that I have 2 domain controllers: dc(initial) and bdc (backup). Rsync command /usr/bin/rsync -XAavz --delete-after dc:/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/* /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ fires every 5 minutes on bdc. However, if I try to gpupdate from bdc I get the above error. Gpupdating from dc works

cool! root at dc1:~ # wbinfo -r richard.h 10001 3000008 10000 10014 10004 10005 3000005 3000009 3000000 -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of lingpanda101 via samba Sent: 12 January 2017 22:57 To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.5.3 AD DC - issues with sysvol when setting up Group Policies On 1/12/2017 3:47 PM,

Hello, I have manually mounted the SYSVOL share, sync it with samba and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. But I'm not sure if all windows policies are acceptable by samba because of errors logs: 2015/03/18 09:30:52.197934, 0] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:338(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file myDomain.local/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Registry.pol --

> It's needed after every GPO addition and edit. There must be a root > cause to hunt down somewhere. Or is it a bug in 4.13.0 ? Yes, and no. Yes, its a bug. No, in my opionion its an old setting thats just needs some updating. Try this. samba-tool ntacl set "O:LAG:BAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;BA)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;SO)(A;OICI;0x001f01

Of course, the sysvol is located on a windows controller from the forest. mount -t cifs -o username=domain_admin_user //windowsDC.myDomain.local/SYSVOL /mnt/smb/sysvol and copied the files with -R --preserve to /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ Below logs are provided from /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd file. regards, On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at

On 20/05/15 18:13, Ryan Ashley wrote: > I have been fighting a strange issue with Samba for over a year now, and > I am at my wits end. For some reason, clients are unable to get group > policy settings from the servers. It honestly appears to be the Windows > 7 systems just deciding they don't want to, but they're not terminators. > The systems can ping both Samba servers