similar to: Consistent ID mappings across Domain Controllers

On 5/8/2018 9:07 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2018 08:59:52 -0400 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>     Is there a command or quick way to verify idmap.ldb is >> consistent across domain controllers? Similar to using samba-tool to >> compare two ldap databases? Thanks. >> > No,

On Tue, 8 May 2018 09:23:42 -0400 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > My concern is with human error and built in groups. I'm using RFC2307 > on all DC's so all UID's and GID's for manually created user & groups > I should be good. I'm pretty confident for all DC's I have added to > the domain, I took the step to copy and

Hello,     Is there a command or quick way to verify idmap.ldb is consistent across domain controllers? Similar to using samba-tool to compare two ldap databases? Thanks. -- -- James

Created an feature request "add resolving for well known security principals" https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11997 Am 25.06.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: > > > Am 25.06.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >>> >>> >>> Am 24.06.2016 um 22:57 schrieb

Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Achim Gottinger: > > > Am 24.06.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 24/06/16 21:35, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>>>> On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote:

Am 27.06.2016 um 14:08 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 26/06/16 12:43, Achim Gottinger wrote: >> Created an feature request >> >> "add resolving for well known security principals" >> >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11997 >> >> Am 25.06.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >>> >>> >>> Am 25.06.2016 um

On 27/06/16 13:30, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 27.06.2016 um 14:08 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 26/06/16 12:43, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>> Created an feature request >>> >>> "add resolving for well known security principals" >>> >>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11997 >>> >>> Am 25.06.2016 um

On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >> >> 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com >> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com >> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>>: >> >> On 6/22/2016 12:21 PM, mathias dufresne wrote: >>

On 24/06/16 21:35, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>> On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com >>>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>

Am 24.06.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: > > > Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>> On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com >>>> <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>

On 27/06/16 13:26, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > > After lots of testing and checking today im must concluded that achim and mathias are right. > There are "BUILDIN\" security groups which make some GPOs are going wrong. > > Also, im getting errors again with sysvolcheck. .. i was in the understanding this was resolved.. but im but off with all info, very buzy

Le 25 juin 2016 10:30, "Rowland penny" <rpenny at samba.org> a écrit : > > On 24/06/16 22:08, Achim Gottinger wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 24.06.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> >>>> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com

Am 24.06.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 24/06/16 21:35, Achim Gottinger wrote: >> >> >> Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>>> On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at

2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com <lingpanda101 at gmail.com>: > On 6/22/2016 12:21 PM, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> 2016-06-22 16:37 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl>: >> >> @Mathias, >>> >>> Pretty strange then, running some years like this without any problem. >>> Yes we had few problems with

On 24/06/16 22:08, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 24.06.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 24.06.2016 um 21:24 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 24/06/16 19:47, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>>> On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00

On 6/24/2016 11:40 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2016-06-24 15:24 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com> <lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>>: > > On 6/22/2016 12:21 PM, mathias dufresne wrote: > > 2016-06-22 16:37 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl >

On 26/06/16 12:43, Achim Gottinger wrote: > Created an feature request > > "add resolving for well known security principals" > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11997 > > Am 25.06.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >> >> >> Am 25.06.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Achim Gottinger: >>> >>> >>> Am 24.06.2016 um 23:16

On 6/22/2016 12:21 PM, mathias dufresne wrote: > 2016-06-22 16:37 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl>: > >> @Mathias, >> >> Pretty strange then, running some years like this without any problem. >> Yes we had few problems with "rights" in sysvol, but i fixed this all >> outside linux, and with that i mean. Changed rights from within

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 11:43:45 -0400 lingpanda101--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 10/4/2016 11:22 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > See inline comments: > > > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:44:07 -0400 > > Bob Thomas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hey Samba team - Thanks for all your work > >> >

On 10/4/2016 11:22 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > See inline comments: > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:44:07 -0400 > Bob Thomas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hey Samba team - Thanks for all your work >> >> I have three production samba 4 DCs 2 running on Ubuntu 16.04 (Samba >> 4.4.5 and 4.4.4) and one on 14.04 (Samba 4.3.3) all