Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70000 matches similar to: "Added RFC2307 --> Unable to convert SID (S-1-1-0)"
2015 Jun 05
3
Added RFC2307 --> Unable to convert SID (S-1-1-0)
>From my .bash_history on the schema master DC, effectively:
# sed -e 's/${DOMAINDN}/dc=MYDOMAIN,dc=MY,dc=TLD/g' \
-e 's/${NETBIOSNAME}/MYDOMAIN/g' \
-e 's/${NISDOMAIN}/MYDOMAIN/g' \
/usr/local/samba/share/setup/ypServ30.ldif > ypServ30-JMH.ldif
# service samba4 stop
# ldbmodify -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb
2015 Jun 11
4
idmap & migration to rfc2307
Yup, strange - right!
Samba 4.2.2
RFC2307 attributes were added as follows:
# sed -e 's/${DOMAINDN}/dc=MYDOMAIN,dc=MY,dc=TLD/g' \
-e 's/${NETBIOSNAME}/MYDOMAIN/g' \
-e 's/${NISDOMAIN}/MYDOMAIN/g' \
/usr/local/samba/share/setup/ypServ30.ldif > ypServ30-JMH.ldif
# service samba4 stop
# ldbmodify -H
2015 Jun 11
2
idmap & migration to rfc2307
(to clarify, in case people are skimming this thread and think it is
fixed..) The problem still occurs - id mappings are still being
overwritten.. :(
2015 Jun 11
2
idmap & migration to rfc2307
I *think* I may have encountered a bug, or a feature, in the idmap/winbind area.
I have recently added rfc2307 attributes to my AD, and am in the
process of switching over. This means that I still have
(unintentionally) some files/directories/etc. around with old UIDs
e.g. 3000007, rather than my rfc2307 specified UIDs.
What I am seeing is that the SID2XID mapping is initially correct for
a
2015 Jun 05
0
Added RFC2307 --> Unable to convert SID (S-1-1-0)
On 05/06/15 11:41, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> From my .bash_history on the schema master DC, effectively:
>
> # sed -e 's/${DOMAINDN}/dc=MYDOMAIN,dc=MY,dc=TLD/g' \
> -e 's/${NETBIOSNAME}/MYDOMAIN/g' \
> -e 's/${NISDOMAIN}/MYDOMAIN/g' \
> /usr/local/samba/share/setup/ypServ30.ldif > ypServ30-JMH.ldif
>
2015 Jun 12
2
idmap & migration to rfc2307
Thanks buhorojo. The sssd list came up trumps here. When changing ID
mappings, the sssd database must be manually removed (rm
/var/lib/sss/db/*). I now have sssd working again :)
I shall keep an eye on the mappings during the day today..
On 12 June 2015 at 07:36, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/06/15 01:34, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 11 June 2015 at
2017 Aug 03
1
file server, AD client, no rfc2307
2017-07-27 16:33 GMT+02:00 mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com>:
>
>
> 2017-07-27 15:14 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
> :
>
>> On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:51:52 +0100
>> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:36:51 +0100
>> > Rowland Penny via
2016 Oct 04
2
winbindd losing track of RFC2307 UIDs
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 02:35:21 +0200
Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.10.2016 um 18:57 schrieb Rob via samba:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been experiencing an intermittent problem where some UIDs on a
> > member server spontaneously change from being their AD-derived
> > values to being allocated from the default
2016 Oct 03
6
winbindd losing track of RFC2307 UIDs
Hi all,
I've been experiencing an intermittent problem where some UIDs on a member
server spontaneously change from being their AD-derived values to being
allocated from the default idmap space, even when there is no change to the AD
user information.
Specifically, I have a member server running Samba 4.4.5 on CentOS 6.8.
AD service is provided by two Samba 4.4.5 servers.
The member
2015 Jun 05
0
Added RFC2307 --> Unable to convert SID (S-1-1-0)
On 05/06/15 10:44, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have now added rfc2307 to my domain - I extended the schema, have
> added UIDs to some (not all yet) of my users and groups, and have my
> smb.conf with this currently:
>
> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes winbind nss info = rfc2307
>
> winbind use default domain = Yes winbind enum users = Yes winbind
> enum
2015 Nov 07
2
idmap & migration to rfc2307
Hi,
Resurrecting an older thread, but this same problem has just
re-occurred following a recent upgrade from 4.2.2 to 4.3.1.
When this issue occurs, I can't access various files on my server
(whether sysvol or other shares) - this seems to be down to incorrect
UID mappings. I am using rfc2307 to set my UIDs, but samba
occasionally seems to ignore this.
I first noticed the problem when a
2023 Nov 26
1
Switching to a RFC2307 Schema
On 25.11.2023 19:11:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 18:58:02 +0100
> mail--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > after stumbling in almost every thread, that it makes sense to have
> > RFC2307 enabled, I wanted to switch an AD DC to it and follwed this
> > wiki page
2015 Jun 05
0
Added RFC2307 --> Unable to convert SID (S-1-1-0)
really...
> winbind expand groups = 8
This wil make your authentication very slow..
for your problem, please post your complete smb.conf
im missing a lot..
Like..
## map id's outside to domain to tdb files.
idmap config * : backend = tdb
idmap config * : range = 2000-9999
## map ids from the domain and (*) the range may not overlap !
2019 Jul 04
2
WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND error with RFC2307
I am still trying to configure Samba to authenticate users against
ActiveDirectory, but lookup uid and gids against a stand-alone OpenLDAP
server. Related to a previous recommendation, I found the idmap_rfc2307
capability, which seems likely exactly what I what.
Unfortunately, it does not seem to work. Users are not permitted to access
shares for which they are in the group.
Tests I found online
2023 Nov 26
1
Switching to a RFC2307 Schema
On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 15:30:19 +0100
mail--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 25.11.2023 19:11:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 18:58:02 +0100
> > mail--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > after stumbling in almost every thread, that it makes sense to
>
2015 Nov 07
4
idmap & migration to rfc2307
On 2015-11-07 at 17:47 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> On 7 November 2015 at 17:01, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > Also, for all I know, the DC always has local unix user and group
> > IDs, and does NOT use the rfc2307 attributes for this. (Unless
> > this has changed recently, but I can't imagine how.) So there is
> > nothing wrong with
2018 Jan 16
3
Avoiding uid conflicts between rfc2307 user/groups and computers
Mandi! Kacper Wirski via samba
In chel di` si favelave...
> I understand the OP, I was asking some time ago similar question, but it was
> in relation to samba domain member.
Thanks, Kacper.
> I couldn't get backend: ad to work for
> machine accounts, so i switched to idmap: rid and it solved everything. I
> tried manually adding UID and GID to Domain Computer group and to
2016 Oct 04
2
winbindd losing track of RFC2307 UIDs
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:09:40 +0200
Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.10.2016 um 15:43 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:16:17 +0200
> > Achim Gottinger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 04.10.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Rowland Penny:
> >>> On
2019 Jul 05
2
WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND error with RFC2307
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 04/07/2019 21:25, Ryan via samba wrote:
> > I am still trying to configure Samba to authenticate users against
> > ActiveDirectory, but lookup uid and gids against a stand-alone OpenLDAP
> > server. Related to a previous recommendation, I found the idmap_rfc2307
> >
2015 Jun 13
4
idmap & migration to rfc2307
On 13/06/15 11:00, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> On 13 June 2015 at 09:34, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 June 2015 at 08:55, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sadly, even though sssd is now running and I'm no longer reliant on
>>> winbind, the rest of samba doesn't seem to be taking notice of these
>>>