similar to: making samba 4.2 in a container

Thanks for the info. Did you create unprivileged containers to run Samba in? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com> wrote: > I have my deployment of Version 4.1.17-Debian in a Debian container. I > pretty much a standard system container with Samba installed. I run two > of them in a virtual network on a VPS as Domain controllers. Each > instance is

Thank you for the excellent advice. so an lxc container should be a privilege vm. Do containers share the same file system like a BSD chroot jail? Or do they have a virtual disk image like vmware or virtual box? Sorry to be dense here. If you know of any good tutorials on making lxc containers, I'd like to read them. My thinking was that I would make an lxc container for the addc instance

I did not implement Unprivileged containers because there is no dynamic uid remapping implemented so I would have to statically change the uids and gid's of all of the system files with uidshift and It didn't work well with the AUFS setup I originally and I haven't tested it with ldap accounts so I have no clue if there would be an issue with uid mapping. Since then I moved to

Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and how much virtual hardware to give each VM. I'm wondering about virtual nics and if there may be a

I'm starting a project to build a MythTV box for my living room. Anyone else currently working with MythTV on CentOS 4? Here are some of the gotcha's I've worked through so far: - I was originally planning on using KnoppMyth. But their CD appears to be only for i386. Without realizing it, the P4 CPU I picked is one of the newer ones with the x86_64 extensions. It won't boot

I think winbind is required for file service isn't it? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 10/06/15 21:15, David Bear wrote: > > Thanks Rowland -- will attempt to pull the startup script from the deb > package. > > Just to clarify, When starting samba as an AD DC, we use the samba-ad-dc > script, when

my first round of trying to compile samba 4.2 from source in an lxc container. Host OS is ubuntu 14.04 lts, and lxc template was the ubuntu template. This is a privileged container. good news, is the container seems to function well. Bad news is missing dependancies. So, in tracking down depenancies, here's what I installed in to the container apt-get install python apt-get install

Will a samba 4.1.9 work fine if there are newer samba 4.x AD DC in the domain? I compiled samba 4.1.9 from source on ubuntu 14 server. Now I am wondering if I can use the debian backports repo and get whatever samba is current there --is is amba 4.1.11 ? Not sure if its worth it to compile samba for each of my addc's, or if I can be lazy and use the deb from a repo. Would love

I have a Samba-ad-dc node no longer listening on port 135 making it impossible to replicate to it and It is holding up a domain upgrade. I appended the testparam output to give someone a chance to tell me how I mis-configured it. Is it possible to configure these these Domain Controllers to replicate over LDAP instead of RPC? -------------- next part -------------- Press enter to see a dump of

Hi David Thanks you for reply, are you sure about this? Windows and Samba SMB byte range locking feature doesn't allow this by locking regions of a single file ? From: "David Bear" <dwbear75 at gmail.com> To: "Dante F. B. Colò" <dante.colo at stwbrasil.com> Cc: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:59:56 PM

Hi All- Please pardon my repost of my usenet article in this list. Previously, I asked if Samba 3.0 could be an Active Directory Domain Controller (ADDC). I have the feeling that the answer is no. If so, then I have this other question: Can I use Samba as an NT4 PDC for making a Windows NT4 domain that would host several M$ Windows XPP client computers as domain clients/members, but have

We would like to use samba 4.x as our ADDC and also as an ldap source for authentication. Google apps can use an ldap server as a source for users and groups. There seems to be plenty of use of AD as a ldap server for this purpose. I wanted to check to see if anyone has used samba 4 running as an ADDC as an authentication server for other services that can consume ldap. -- David Bear mobile:

I still don't understand something I know is critical for a samba 4 addc to work. We want to run DNS from our firewall/router. This seems to be the natural place for it. Furthermore, it's already there. But it seems when samba 4.x is running as an ADDC, it also wants to run/be dns. Is there a way to keep dns running on our firewall appliance and have samba refer to that? If so, what are

Thanks Rowland -- will attempt to pull the startup script from the deb package. Just to clarify, When starting samba as an AD DC, we use the samba-ad-dc script, when starting samba as a file server only, we need a script that only starts smbd, nmbd, and winbind. ? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com > wrote: > On 10/06/15 03:26, David Bear

2015-05-12 21:50 GMT+02:00 David Bear <dwbear75 at gmail.com>: > Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than > a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common > to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? > > If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and > how much

Which branch of the Samba repository has Roland Penny's FSMO patch in it? I want to rebuild my Samba4 server packages so they resemble something reproduceable.

A "good" acl manual. http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/ACL/linux-acl.html As i do prefeer the debian os, but i do really like the archlinux wiki. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Access_Control_Lists Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Frank Kahle > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 augustus 2016 13:55

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:

Is there a list of GPO functions that are known not to work with samba 4.1 ? We have a case where some settings in a GPO will get applied, and others don't. -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

But I do. I use Sernet packages and it's working fine. Am 25. Januar 2015 17:11:44 MEZ, schrieb John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com>: >You won't be able to use Samba AD DC functionality with Centos 7 >without >building it yourself. >http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/535153-centos-7-samba-domain-controller > >For my uses of Samba I use Debian 7. > > >On