similar to: Windows-8 & SMB encryption

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > Is this our snprintf or one from Solaris ? Can > > > you try and track down why it's returning

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi Volker and the list > > Yesterday the problem appeared again > > I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on > and this is the result > > [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 > Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit > 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW,

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 01:38:26PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi again Volker (& list) > > I think I am very closer of the problem. Sorry, but without access to this system I can't really say what is going on. Please talk to Oracle for support. Samba is running fine on a huge variety of file systems, and if ACFS gives you locking issues, I would request Oracle to fix their

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

Hello All, I am currently having an issue with my samba PDC. I have recently updated to 3.6.5 Samba, and have made what i believe to be the correct changes in my config to account for the changes to the idmap system. My setup is as follows, SAMBA PDC on RHEL 6.2, which authenticates passwords through Kerberos, and Deals with user profiles via LDAP. I had about 25 Windows clients which were able

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:44:24AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Ok, it is becoming a nightmare ;-) > Last question Volker > > Is it possible the problem comes from a network device? > At job, we have been suffering problems with a F5 Load Balancer. It seems > that, randomly, it sets the transmission frame to 0 bytes during a while > and routing services don't work very

Hello list, I am looking to enable samba aio on my Wheezy test box (I have version 4.1.17 from back ports). The output of smbd -b shows that the stable packages for my distro are not compiled using --with-aio-support. It appears that without recompiling I can use vfs objects = aio_pthread to achieve a similar effect? I'm aware that this somewhat dips into Debian specifics, but I figured

Hi, I?ve added an existing group (?2d3d?) to an existing user (?jschopp?) on our AD server. When I execute ?id jschopp? the new group membership is not reflected: # id jschopp uid=1333(jschopp) gid=2020(dom?nen-benutzer) groups=2020(dom?nen-benutzer),610(BUILTIN+users) This is a strange behavior. Is this a caching issue? Kind regards, Martin AD: Windows Server 2008 RC2 with Windows Services

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:01:34PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > The symptom is that the windows process which is accessing the samba share > hangs > Also, if you try to open the same share (you can do the connection) to see > the files, the ls command hangs > > The other samba shares don't be affected at all, they work ok > > So the only thing you can do is a

Hi Folk, I am writing a Samba VFS module. The VFS CLOSE operation takes a longer time, much greater than 20s, to return. Looks this will cause Samba client server communication timeout. And Samba will load a new module, which is not what I want. I want Samba to wait, until VFS CLOSE operation finishes what it should do. I don't want Samba to load a new module. Can anyone tell me how/where to

My name is Kenji Ichinoseki and I am in charge of a project at Sumitomo Electric Networks, Inc. Please give me cooperation by all means about the affair in the account of a title. Now, I included "Samba 3.0.37" in the Linux system currently developed (us). And it is testing using "smbtorture(samba3.5.8 source4) ". The point in question was found in our entry of this test. It

I am trying to set up a caching link between two points, that can be shared with windows and *nix. In both locations, I have linux-based servers with data, which have caching NFS mounts (that is, mount -t nfs -o fsc, with cachefilesd). These mounts are working correctly and I have tested the cache locally to much success. What I have not been able to get working is sharing those mounts with

I added debuging as follows: /* no O_EXCL, existence check is via the fcntl lock */ lockfile_fd = open(lockfile_name.buf, O_NONBLOCK|O_CREAT|O_WRONLY, 0644); if (lockfile_fd == -1) { ret = errno; DEBUG(1, ("%s: open failed: %s\n", __func__, strerror(errno))); return ret; }

I'm running a PDC on Samba 3.60. Just freshly upgraded it from Samba 3.028a with the purpose of supporting Windows 7. However though all the existing users and computers are running fine, I'm stumped trying to join a new Windows 7 machine to it. I have applied the DomainCompatibility registry fix. When I try to join a Windows 7 workstation I will get this message : The join operation

I've read what I can find about SMB passwords, but I don't get what they are. Are they Unix passwords or an alternative to them? If I have a file share, and the underlying file system requires some sort of credentials to access it, what is the relationship between that and an SMB password? If a client tries to access the share, using a user account that is listed in the smbpasswd file,

I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where I'm confident in the answer, so I figure I'd just ask again here if that's ok. Here's what we have, and what we'd like to do: Storage is a Netapp (cluster mode CDOT 8.2 I believe), it's NFS exported to our linux system. Linux system is CentOS 6 and can NFS mount the

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

Hi all. I'm trying to install Samba 4.2.0 on a Solaris 64 bit Unix server by doing the following but the configure script fails with "Couldn't determine size of 'bool'", any ideas ? :- # gunzip samba-latest.tar.gz # tar -xvf samba-latest.tar # cd samba-4.2.0 # ./configure ... ... Checking for blksize_t : ok Checking for blkcnt_t