similar to: Can't join machine without full access

what i read is correct, yes. > Adding a windows 7 machine to the domain fails with "access denied". you forgot the followin, for what i read below. add the user to a "Domain\GROUP" add this group to the LOCAL_PC\Administrators group. and now your set to go.. even if you give a user or group the rights to join a domain. This user or group MUST have Administrator

El 28/04/15 a les 12:52, Mario Pio Russo ha escrit: > hi all > > the sernet package is actually a good alterrnative, however I can't make > the repository work with ubuntu 14.04 > > has anyone used these repo? Yes, I'm using them on a test machine with ubuntu 14.04 lts. Did you replace USERNAME:ACCESSKEY with your data? Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation

> I don't have a "server services" line see the defaults of smb.conf : testparm -vv | grep "server services" and you have your defaults. now you know what the defaults are.., now for example my DC. testparm -vv ( on the DC, samba-tool testparm -vv | grep "server services" ) gives back: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl,

El 02/06/15 a les 16:11, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: > Sernet samba 4.2.2 in ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS, a fresh migration from samba 3 > (I'm still in the testing phase). > > I'm experimenting with task delegation. I'm also having the same problems with GPO delegation: In GPMC I granted permission to a group I'm a member of, but I get "Access denied" when I try to

As I have said: sssd-ad works fine with sernet packages on redhat based distros. Have you tried this? apt-get install sssd-ad samba-libs- Notice the - at the end Found here: http://serverfault.com/questions/250224/how-do-i-get-apt-get-to-ignore-some-dependencies After this, try to resolve the dependencies of the sssd-ad.so file as I have written. Regards Tim Am 31. M?rz 2015 12:22:18 MESZ,

El 30/03/15 a les 11:38, Rowland Penny ha escrit: >> Is there any hope to have this issue fixed? Where does one report bugs >> in the sernet packaging? >> >> >> TIA > > Have you tried to install sssd-ad ? that link you posted was about > installing on 12.04, things may have changed. You could try 'apt-get > install -s sssd-ad' > This will tell

Thank you a lot Luca! I was able to change searchFlags using ldbedit command and I can't test right now the ldbmodify tool as samba seems to be indexing it's database (one thread eating 100% CPU for several minute, since I launched a ldbsearch on "uid" field). I'll try without my typo error (thank you again :) the ldbmodify command (to stop telling it doesn't work when

El 03/04/15 a les 20:33, Andrey Repin ha escrit: > Eh? What the? Why? Google says it may be an issue with DNS, but mine works > fine. Especially since a few lines before it successfully contact AD DC. Probably not related, but I had an issue with kerberos and it turns out I had the wrong host name for 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation Technology

El 12/06/15 a les 14:47, joseph-andre Guaragna ha escrit: > official documentation on samba describe this situation: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_functional_levels > Meilleures salutations / Best regards, There's also this issue: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-July/174639.html (even if time synchronization seems to work fine). Bye -- Luca

El 09/04/15 a les 14:57, Andrey Repin ha escrit: >> Using the RFC2307 attributes, you will get the same ID number on every >> Unix machine, whereas if you use the 'rid' backend, whilst you should >> get the same ID on each Unix machine, you will never get the same ID on >> an AD DC, in fact without intervention, you will get a different ID on >> different

Hello, I'll soon have to migrate our samba shares to a netapp filer (not my decision). Currently the shares are on an xfs filesystem and served by samba 3.5.2, which is also the domain controller (a role that it will maintain, only the shares are being transferred) and sama/unix users are in ldap. The filer is in the domain and uses ldap to map user ids and that seems to work. Samba maps the

The problem here is that sssd does not know sernet-samba-libs is also providing samba-libs or get the source of sssd and change/add the sernet-samba-libs in de Depens of the source yourself. or ask the sssd developers to add this. Its not that hard.. apt-get install build-essentials apt-get source sssd modify the needed in sourcemap/Debian/ apt-get source -b wait... and you have your

Hello, I'm testing a classicupgrade using ubuntu 14.04 lts and the sernet samba packages. I also configured all other servers in the test network to use sssd, leaving the domain controller last, but I see that sssd-ad cannot be installed alongside sernet-samba. I see that this isn't a new problem, lingering at least since December 2013:

On 31/03/15 03:54, Sketch wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On 30/03/15 16:33, Luca Olivetti wrote: >>> Right, the correct solution would be to package samba in a way that >>> doesn't break sssd. >> >> You could also say that sssd should be packaged in a way that works >> with the sernet packages. > > I'm with

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The packages are online :-) Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on > jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. > > > Gr, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >>

El 09/04/15 a les 16:20, Rowland Penny ha escrit: > On 09/04/15 14:58, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> El 09/04/15 a les 14:57, Andrey Repin ha escrit: >>>> Using the RFC2307 attributes, you will get the same ID number on every >>>> Unix machine, whereas if you use the 'rid' backend, whilst you should >>>> get the same ID on each Unix machine, you will

Zitat von Luca Olivetti <luca at wetron.es>: > El 12/04/16 a les 08:30, Luca Bertoncello ha escrit: > >> If I add the user to the group "Domain Admins" all created files and >> directories have wrong owner. >> As soon as the user is no member of "Domain Admins" anymore, the owner >> is correct... > >

Samba 4.0.8, from the tarball, compiled with ./configure make sudo make install # /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba -b Samba version: 4.0.8 Build environment: Build host: Linux template.wetron.local 3.8.13.4-server-1.mga3 #1 SMP Thu Jul 4 14:04:54 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Paths: BINDIR: /usr/local/samba/bin SBINDIR: /usr/local/samba/sbin CONFIGFILE:

Dear all, My , samba-tool domain level show shows me it is W2003: [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 Can I raise without issues to W 2008 R2? Or should I stay with 2003? Greetings

El 09/04/15 a les 18:31, Rowland Penny ha escrit: > > If your tools rely on the posix objectclasses being there, then they are > broken. The posix objectclasses are auxiliaries of other AD > objectclasses and as such, no windows tools will add them. but, e.g., samba-tool with --uid will: luca at ubutest:~$ sudo samba-tool user add tararo tarari --use-username-as-cn