similar to: Resolving computeraccount$

On 12/05/15 20:27, Greg Enlow wrote: > To the powers the might be, > > it seems that the "(root) preexec" function does not work when used with "msdfs proxy". Is that just "my" problem, an error or by design? > If it is by design, I would be curious to know why. > If it is an error, can it be addressed fairly quickly? > If it is none of the above,

Hi, I was wondering if someone had any thoughts as to why "preexec" doesn't fire when "msdfs proxy" is used? Thank you, Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 13 May 2015, at 11:18, Greg Enlow wrote: ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access

On 18/05/15 07:36, Daniel M?ller wrote: > Msdfs proxy is pointing to another instance of samba servers, it passes > through. > I think running preexec there on the other instance will do the trick. > > Greetings > Daniel > > > EDV Daniel M?ller > > Leitung EDV > Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus > Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 > 72076 T?bingen > Tel.:

Hi, Thank you for you input! We tried that already. That, however, doesn't do the same thing. It is then simply a DFS server and not the "magical" msdfs proxy - yes the user can now click on a link to get to the desired spot, but the proxy function _automagically_ sends the user, when they access the msdfs share, to the netapp's readonly share without the extra click. And it

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > > The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would really like to avoid that. Warranty and such make it a bit of a legal issue. That is the reason we went with a separate instance in the first place and now wonder why the

Hey, thanks for the input! I am looking into that. It is however a bit complicated due to the authentication lines and share connect lines being only related due to proximity in the log. It would probably work for most of the instances, but it would not be 100% viable, meaning we would be getting compaints and questions from our user "I ain't got that share?! WTF!!" I was going to

One more time: root preexec does: run a command or script if the user hit the share. Now with msdfs proxy it need to be run on the linked host that carries the share. So you are better to set root preexec on the share of the linked host. I think there is no other way. Server1 [sharepointtoserver2] msdfs root=yes msdfs proxy =\server2\shareonserver2 Server2 [shareonserver2] Root

Hi, The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would really like to avoid that. Warranty and such make it a bit of a legal issue. That is the reason we went with a separate instance in the first place and now wonder why the preexec doesn't fire. There is nothing in tmp of the msdfs box. Like

Msdfs proxy is pointing to another instance of samba servers, it passes through. I think running preexec there on the other instance will do the trick. Greetings Daniel EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de

ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS proxies that point the client to that read-only

Well, this doesn't fix the preexec issue, but you might scan through the samba logs finding connections to the RO share, identify that IP address there, track back to Hostname and/or user who authenticated to that share and the use that as the basis for the email address. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Greg Enlow <grenlow at hk.mailbox.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for you

Good Morning and thank you for your input. I had and still do understand what both preexec and root preexec do. I had also and still do understand the paths you had explained. I, however, had also already explained on 18 May 2015 15:31:55 CEST why your first solution was _not_ a viable option for us (server2 == NETAPP under warranty). I had also already explained on 21 May 2015 22:41:17 CEST

Hi all, I was going to ask one more tine before I walk away sad and depressed - any hope on finding out why our installation won't fire 'preexec' with 'msdfs proxy' activated? 'til then! Greg Enlow -- Greg Enlow grenlow at hk.mailbox.de On 18 May 2015, at 18:20, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > >

On 2015-10-29 09:52, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 08:34, Davor Vusir wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain >> administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use GPO >> for Windowsservers. As Samba does not understand GPO I have initially >> used the "username map" feature to add a

2018-03-10 19:48 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 01:10:46PM +0100, Davor Vusir via samba wrote: > > > > Off list I got a tip on using become_user(). A soon as I get a grip on > how > > to extract the calling user's vuid I give it a try I have of course tried > > other functions; become_user_permanently( ),

this module doesn't seem to want to work on anything but a root ubuntu filesystem. It won't work on any external drives or secondary drives just the main one. This poses as a problem for a system with several drives. if i delete on a secondary drive of any sort with any use in a samba share over smb i get the folders placed in the recycle bin but no file. I have a sent copy of the config

On 2015-10-29 12:23, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:47, Davor Vusir wrote: >> On 2015-10-29 09:52, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 08:34, Davor Vusir wrote: >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain >>>> administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use

mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: > I'm thick :D > I don't really understand more :( > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more enlightning: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg123646.html. > Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also

On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >> >> >> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>> I'm thick :D >>> I don't really understand more :( >>> >> >> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more >> enlightning: >>

2018-03-09 20:39 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:07:54PM +0100, Davor Vusir via samba wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Is it possible to run smbd in an AD user's context? > > If not, is it possible to have smbd to tell a third-party function to not > > stray outside from logged on user's (AD user) context (home