similar to: Posix vs. Windows File/Directory Permissions

On 13/05/15 13:38, Mike wrote: > I want to get a better understanding of what's happening between the posix > permissions and windows permissions. Nothing happens between posix permissions (acls) and windows permissions (ACLs), they are different, see: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs On Unix, you can set read, write and execute/enter

Wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here - just built some new bricks running gluster 3.4 alpha 3 (from http://download.gluster.org) with the objective of testing them to replace some existing 3.2 systems in production. The main thing I was after was NFS ACL support, however on getting everything setup, I still don't seem to be able to see POSIX extended ACLs on the

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

I've been running the same configuration for a couple of years now, and since I've upgraded to Office 2007, MS Word and MS Excel files save to my samba shares as -r-------- even when they are opened as being chmod 777. Files I create/edit using other editors or windows explorer are put onto the share with the correct permissions. My conf looks like this: [global] workgroup = WG

On 13/02/2023 10:54, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 10.02.23 um 11:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> Hmm, so there is a DC that is having some dns problems and the windows >> admin isn't bothered that this 'may' be replicating to his other DC's >> ???? > > seems so > > I don't know if he would take that one DC down if

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 16:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:58:52 +0100 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Hai

Ubuntu 8.04lts Dovecot 1.2.6 So, further to the 'deliver' problem posted yesterday I've also discovered another issue regarding permissions: files and directories are being created 0600/0700 by the IMAP and deliver process (depending on who gets there first!) preventing use of shared mailboxes. According to documentation: "When creating a new mailbox, Dovecot v1.2+ copies the

Am 10.02.23 um 11:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Hmm, so there is a DC that is having some dns problems and the windows > admin isn't bothered that this 'may' be replicating to his other DC's ???? seems so I don't know if he would take that one DC down if I recommend that to him > Yes, good to keep up to date, but like you, I don't think updating will

Hello, I configured samba fileserver as a member of samba domain. PDC and fileserver are different machines. It works great using windows sharing. Now, I need to set up apache to serve my shares, but I am having problem with permissions. Apache runs as www-user, and doesn't see content in shares. So I would like to ask, what is the proper way to use apache (or another http server) to serve

thanks for the answer, Louis. i m talking about the userhome dir. I ve already read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders and i m applying the posix acls to my share. As the users's home is shared between windows and linux, i d rather use the posix acls than the windows ones. Beside the homedir of my users have a form like /home/ first letter of name /login ( ex : /home/d/dare

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg at uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > Not sure which email you mean. I don't think that this can happen. If the > Linux acls are modified, the Windows ACLs are destroyed and all is based on > the Linux permissions and acls (which looks strange when viewed from > Window). If the Windows ACLs are modified, Samba automatically

Hi all, I need a biggest help... I have the following environment: - SuSE 8.0 with all patches; - Samba (2.2.3a RPM-SuSE) + LDAP; - OpenLDAP2 (2.0.23 RPM-SuSE); - smbldap-tools (0.7 - TGZ). All was functioning perfectly, but suddenly one of the Samba shares presented problems: the files/directories are corrupted!!! No changes are made in configuration, and appear the following datas in to the

Greetings, My setup is a multimaster win2k domain with full trusts established. My samba server has joined one of the master domains as a member server. smb.conf has encrypted passwords enabled and security=domain and running on Samba Version 3.0.1pre1 on Linux 2.4.20-20.9smp. Groupmap seems not to work as I was expecting it to. I am trying to map the local unix group

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have either > libnss-winbind or libpam-winbind files on my AD/DC. I keep forgetting that you use slackware, I suppose it uses something different, but do you have any file like: libnss_winbind.so.2 > > Circling back

Hi Rowland, sorry, I hit the wrong reply button in the last answer. So there is no other way than to use Windows ACLs? I was told with our old systems (Samba 3 in non-domain mode) the behaviour I want to achieve was possible when only using ugo. Greetings, Felix -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Rowland Penny Gesendet:

I have samba server joined to a domain that I'm trying to use ads security and acls on. I can set acls on the Unix file system, and access from a windows client seems to honor them. I can't view the acls under the security tab, all I see are the standard Unix permissions instead. If I try to add an entry to the acl, I get an access denied error, even if the user is on the list of admin

Hi Rowland, yes I do have two separate config files for smbd/nmbd and winbindd. You can tell winbindd to load a separate config file via the "-s" command line switch. Therefore I set "WINBINDD_EXTRA_OPTS" in "/etc/default/sernet-samba" to "-s /etc/samba/winbindd.conf". The "cached_login" option for pam is also set and working. The problem was

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg at uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > Am 13.05.2015 um 17:30 schrieb S?bastien Le Ray: > >> No they aren't >>> >> >> Yes they are >> > > Not sure about this, but mostly irrelevant anyway, because of this effect > in the other direction: > > If you have set Windows ACLs, and then change

On 19/12/14 01:33, Rich Webb wrote: > Please is there anyone who has an answer on why this might be happening? > Do I need some sort of sssd support or winbind or something? In the > wiki about setting up acl's it doesn't say anything about any other > requirements, only that you have to have acl support and xattr support > in your filesystem which I do. > > I'm

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:47:52 +0200 Corrado Ravinetto via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > thank you for your comprehension > > Il 26/10/2018 16:40, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > OK, two further ldbsearches: > > > > ldbsearch -Hldap://$(hostname -s) -k yes -P > > '(&(samaccountname=*)(uidNumber=*))' uidNumber | grep uidNumber