similar to: hardware sizing and configuration

Am 12.05.2015 um 21:50 schrieb David Bear: > Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate > than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it > common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? > > If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and > how much virtual hardware to give each

Hello Andrey, I am testing a small AD DC setup with 65 users and would like to know if you've had stable experience with running DC and File Server on one server. My test server is Dell Poweredge 2950 with SAS hard drives and 16 GB RAM. So far everything runs normally with no high load and similar I/O on samba ports compared to the old standalone Samba 3 server I will be replacing. Thank

2015-05-12 21:50 GMT+02:00 David Bear <dwbear75 at gmail.com>: > Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than > a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common > to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? > > If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and > how much

Thanks for the info. Did you create unprivileged containers to run Samba in? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com> wrote: > I have my deployment of Version 4.1.17-Debian in a Debian container. I > pretty much a standard system container with Samba installed. I run two > of them in a virtual network on a VPS as Domain controllers. Each > instance is

I think winbind is required for file service isn't it? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 10/06/15 21:15, David Bear wrote: > > Thanks Rowland -- will attempt to pull the startup script from the deb > package. > > Just to clarify, When starting samba as an AD DC, we use the samba-ad-dc > script, when

Greetings, Mike! >>> Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate >>> than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it >>> common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? >> >> You don't need VM's. >> >>> If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware

Someone recently mentioned building a samba addc in a linux container. I'm new to containers and would really love to learn how to do it correctly. Anyone know of how-to's or gotcha's related making samba run in an lxc containter? -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

Thanks Rowland -- will attempt to pull the startup script from the deb package. Just to clarify, When starting samba as an AD DC, we use the samba-ad-dc script, when starting samba as a file server only, we need a script that only starts smbd, nmbd, and winbind. ? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com > wrote: > On 10/06/15 03:26, David Bear

On 2016-08-23 13:10, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > Am 23.08.2016 um 11:43 schrieb Sylvain Nex via samba: >> In my last job, I could see the disasters of restoring virtual machine >> with >> Microsoft AD as a standalone domain controller (a day reinstalling the >> domain controller). >> >> What are the recommendations on virtualizing Samba AD DC

Will a samba 4.1.9 work fine if there are newer samba 4.x AD DC in the domain? I compiled samba 4.1.9 from source on ubuntu 14 server. Now I am wondering if I can use the debian backports repo and get whatever samba is current there --is is amba 4.1.11 ? Not sure if its worth it to compile samba for each of my addc's, or if I can be lazy and use the deb from a repo. Would love

We would like to use samba 4.x as our ADDC and also as an ldap source for authentication. Google apps can use an ldap server as a source for users and groups. There seems to be plenty of use of AD as a ldap server for this purpose. I wanted to check to see if anyone has used samba 4 running as an ADDC as an authentication server for other services that can consume ldap. -- David Bear mobile:

I still don't understand something I know is critical for a samba 4 addc to work. We want to run DNS from our firewall/router. This seems to be the natural place for it. Furthermore, it's already there. But it seems when samba 4.x is running as an ADDC, it also wants to run/be dns. Is there a way to keep dns running on our firewall appliance and have samba refer to that? If so, what are

I have setup samba 4.2.x as an AD DC in a linux container. This is an privileged container. I am using the brdging interface and have bound samba to the specific interface I want. As an ADDC it is working great. Now I go to the linux host, and created a samba 4.2 file server. I was able to join it to the domain. I followed the member server instructions at

I am trying to allow users with permissions in one group (DEV) to have full access to a folder that is owned by (QA). I have not been able to figure this out. Its running samba 4.2 in WORKGROUP mode (I can find everything for domain but I am not ready for that). Its running on freebsd on the latest nas4free build NAS with a ZFS file system.. Thanks in advance Frank Kahle FileCatalyst |

Hi David Thanks you for reply, are you sure about this? Windows and Samba SMB byte range locking feature doesn't allow this by locking regions of a single file ? From: "David Bear" <dwbear75 at gmail.com> To: "Dante F. B. Colò" <dante.colo at stwbrasil.com> Cc: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:59:56 PM

A "good" acl manual. http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/ACL/linux-acl.html As i do prefeer the debian os, but i do really like the archlinux wiki. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Access_Control_Lists Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Frank Kahle > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 augustus 2016 13:55

Hello everyone I trying find what it happens on my Samba AD servers especially with shared spreadsheets, my personal opinion this feature on Excel is crap and unreliable but many people use it, how does Samba currently behave with this ? Is someone experienced any problem with this ? Frequently happens changes made by other user are lost the spreadsheet opens as read only , the shares are all

Hi, Sorry am new, so dont know if this is the right place to ask this question. Microsoft recently released a security update( KB 3161949) that disables netbios connection outside the local subnet. I have been using Samba 3.0.28 and since the name resolution doesn't happen after installing the patch, I cant connect to my shares anymore. If someone is using Linux samba4, can you please let

Is there a list of GPO functions that are known not to work with samba 4.1 ? We have a case where some settings in a GPO will get applied, and others don't. -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

On 12/05/15 09:49, Daniel M?ller wrote: > Hello, > So what?-- my secondary DC has to be virtual and has to be able to do > storage! > But?-- my secondary DC has to be virtual and has to be able to do storage > This could only be solved by a third machine serving the storage! > So why not a samba4 fileserver with enough storage? And no second DC! > > > Greetings >