similar to: Disabling Oplocks and SMB2

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

Hi Samba list! I was very excited that SMB2 is finally working with samba 3.6.0 - great job!! I just know that SMB2 has a smaller command set compared to SMB1 and this, beside many other rebuilds of the code makes it faster As I am completely new to the file transfer protocol world, I want to ask a few basic things: - is Samba backward compatible ... xp can't use SMB2 as far as I

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

Hi, I'm using libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7. When I connect to a vista/2008 server using this libsmbclient library, communication is happening in SMB1 protocol and NOT in SMB2. Please note that I've enabled SMB2 by adding following line to smb.conf max protocol = SMB2 Does libsmbclient library built from source3 directory of samba-3.6.7 supports SMB2?

Hello, i have a Samba Server running on CentOS 5.6 with samba package 3.5.8 from SerNet. Shares can accessed until I enable max protocol = smb2, after that no access is possible. In the samba logfiles such an access is logged with: Failed to parse NTLMSSP packet, could not extract NTLMSSP command Followed by a dump_data. Any ideas? Cheers, Daniel

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi I've a Windows 2008 R1 connected to a share on a samba 3.5.6 (this samba is a domain member of a samba pdc). All work fine. I've enabled "max protocol = smb2" : i can access the share but when it was impossible to rename a new directory named "New Folder" on the share (created by Windows new folder menu). I've the error : init_smb_request: invalid wct

Our smbclient 3.6.5 and smbclient 4.0.7 does not work with SMB2/SMB3, which is a security concern for us. Is there a patch or a workaround that can be done for those releases? I've read that Apple made changes in Maverick 10.9, which now causes failures, but am hoping that something was done to support the MAC OS 10.9 releases. Regards, Mike Tompkins

Hi Can anyone advise me on "kernel oplocks" in a ctdb cluster. I have a ctdb (GPFS is the parallel file system) setup that uses samba (3.5.8) for cifs and IBM CNFS for NFS. Reading the documentation on kernel oplocks it seems to me that I can export the same area via samba and NFS with "kernel oplocks = Yes" . My logic is that IBM CNFS has shared NFS locking

Hi Folks First time poster here.. I have a Samba 3.4.7 ( will upgrade soon ) in a workgroup enviroment, This server has a share containing various Access DB backends.. Wondering about the .ldb lock files that the client front-ends produce.. and if the oplocks and veto options are still current ? as various combinations i have tried don't seem to work.. Would be keen to hear how others

hi All, We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. We use this smb.conf: [global] socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072 read raw = yes server string = %h write raw = yes #oplocks = yes max xmit = 131072 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes use sendfile=yes block size = 131072 load printers = no aio read size

Second request ... Thank you in advance ... - Mike Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 2:16 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP address for SMB2 but not NT1 We are having issues with smbclient 4.0.7 not working to clusters, because it's resolving the host name ( 'default service = dev3k1.my.domain.com' in smb.conf file ) to an IP address

The problem is that I don't want it to use the IP address, but to use the hostname. Regards, - Mike ? ? -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:38 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP

Hello, I set client min protocol = SMB2 in my smb.cnf But I see some clients still connecting in NT1 (smbstatus) : smbstatus -p Mon Jul 22 11:39:36 2019 Samba version 4.8.3 PID???? Username???? Group Machine?????????????????????????????????? Protocol Version Encryption?????????? Signing

Dear all, I have set up a two node workin gluster with glusterfs3.1 and Samba-Sernet 3.5. Everything is working great except MSOffice files (Word/Excell). On the gluster-vol they have the strange behavior That they rest read only, write protected. Every other type of files can be manged without problem, openoffice files too. So when I save a word file on the vol and try to change it it is write

I did not set max protocol to SMB2 in smb.cnf, I don't want to force SMB2 selection if SMB3 can be used by a client. The machine is a Windows 7, so is SMB2 compliant. Le 22/07/2019 ? 11:44, Gaiseric Vandal via samba a ?crit?: > I would guess that changing the min protocol does not affect existing > connections unless you were to restart samba. > > Is the max protocol set to at

I have a classic NT4 domain with the PDC also the wins server. With the recent ransomware problem, we're trying to remove SMB1 and below protocols. However when I do this, the browse list is gone. Hosts can access properly the shares, but they have to know exactly \\machine\share in order to to connect. The same thing from a linux client: smbclient -L {PDC} -m SMB2 Domain=[{MYDOMAIN}]

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:09:05PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote: > Hi Volker, > > Yes this problem happens when we have "kernel oplocks = no". This happened > constantly in one of production systems & so we disabled level2-oplock > /set kernel-oplocks=yes (to avoid this issue). So unfortunately don’t have > an environment where it reproduces now & cannot capture

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:20:05PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:16:34PM +0100, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > > > I am using