similar to: samba 4.2.1 copy idmap...and problems with bi-directional sysvolsync.

Hai Rowland / Andrey, that.. was a stupid one to miss.. that was because it was checking against defaults of samba, forgot to put that one back.. and yes, tested it also with, and im noticing the same. (different id's ) so.. back to winbind... and now id's are same again.. thanks. . and andrey, im using my sysvol scripts to set it up. have a look here,

Hai, ? Im having a strange thing with sernet samba 4.2.1 on debian wheezy. ? I installed 2 dc.s with my scripts. ? i did setup the sysvol replication and now im seeing the following when i create new policies. ? The default GPO's drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Apr 24 10:17 {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators

Please read the reported bug and bjorn answer.. which does not help any to a solution of fix, or explenation. But the big question now is, does someone somewhere know what bjorn is talking about. i did search for "gencache" but no go here.. just from old documentation. https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/tdb.html gencache.tdb Generic caching database.

On 30/04/15 09:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > ( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) > > I still think this is a bug.. > > why not a bug: > If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. > new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. > > why a bug: > User administrator and the domain groups

I forgot about ldbsearch. Here is a dump of xid numbers. root at dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xidNumber xidNumber: 3000028 xidNumber: 3000013 xidNumber: 3000033 xidNumber: 3000003 xidNumber: 3000032 xidNumber: 3000023 xidNumber: 3000019 xidNumber: 3000010 xidNumber: 65534 xidNumber: 3000031 xidNumber: 3000022 xidNumber: 3000026 xidNumber: 3000017 xidNumber: 3000027

Hi, I'm trying to find out consequences of overlapped idmap settings that used with 4.3.11 DC's. I'm about to upgrade these DC's to 4.8 version. Before deploying new DCs, I want to make sure that any side effects regarding id map settings will be left behind. # ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xidNumber \ | cut -d' ' -f2 | sort 0 100 3000000

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: vrijdag 24 april 2015 11:06 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1 > >On 24/04/15 09:52, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Im having a strange thing with

Hai Rowland, Im pretty sure this is a bug in the DC part. I'll show. On the DC. dc1:~# getent passwd winadmin NTDOM\winadmin:*:10000:100::/home/users/winadmin:/bin/bash wbinfo --group-info="Domain Users" NTDOM\domain users:x:100: id winadmin uid=10000(NTDOM\winadmin) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),3000004(BAZRTD\group policy creator owners),3000008(NTDOM\domain admins)

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) I still think this is a bug.. why not a bug: If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. why a bug: User administrator and the domain groups are set by default by samba. and its not consistant at all which is needed for a

Hello,     Looking up a users group membership I'm showing different results on each DC. UID and GID mapping appears consistent but not all group membership is displayed. I've verified idmap.ldb is backup up and copied over to the other DC's. I do notice when taking a hot backup of idmap.ldb, the file size is dramatically smaller than the original. Using Microsoft RSAT to view

cool! root at dc1:~ # wbinfo -r richard.h 10001 3000008 10000 10014 10004 10005 3000005 3000009 3000000 -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of lingpanda101 via samba Sent: 12 January 2017 22:57 To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.5.3 AD DC - issues with sysvol when setting up Group Policies On 1/12/2017 3:47 PM,

Hai,   I just noticed something strange with my group GID assignments.   This happens on my  DC.   I have my “Domain Admins”  “Domain Users” etc given a GID. (im using  ad backend )   Running getent group "domain admins" gives back.   domain admins:x:3000008:administrator,admin   But this is fault..  that GID should be 10001   Anyone noticed this also ?   After

> > I love diving : ) > Ok mathias, Can you explain this. This i dont get.... Why is this output so different, and i dont mean the difference with NTDOMAIN\.. See the groups differences... between a ADDC and a member server.. Samba 4.4.3 ADDC id someusername uid=10002(NTDOMAIN\someusername) gid=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain users) groups=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain

In my DC, without setting explicitly a 'winbind default domain', i can check logins domainless: root at vdcsv1:~# id gaio uid=10000(LNFFVG\gaio) gid=10513(LNFFVG\domain users) gruppi=10513(LNFFVG\domain users),11001(LNFFVG\sir),10999(LNFFVG\unixadm),3000008(LNFFVG\domain admins),3000005(LNFFVG\denied rodc password replication group),3000005(LNFFVG\denied rodc password replication

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, > except for 300000. Below is an example. > > root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ > total 16 > drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies > drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp

Hi Samba Team! It's me again I'm having some issues with gpo's and sysvol access. I've installed samba 4.12.7. using idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 When I tried to create a gpo using the rsat tools I got a Permission Denied error. Among other things, I have run: samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset Also I added to smb.conf acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes in sysvol and netlogon sections. I

Also, I'm not sure whether this has any relevance to the problem but I did at one point try to set up a secondary AD server but was struggling to get it going so demoted it using "Demote an Offline Domain Controller" from this page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demote_a_Samba_AD_DC I also went through the "Verifying the Demotion" checks on this page and all looked

Hi root at dc1:~ # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes ...some error information... Checked 3647 objects (2 errors) root at dc1:~ # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix Checking 3647 objects Checked 3647 objects (0 errors) root at dc1:~ # getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path

Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > Hai, > > > > > In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch > > Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). > > > > Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is no unix_primary_group > > option for the clients. So I have