Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "samba 4.2.1 strange connection problem"
2014 Sep 01
0
Samba 4 dns-resolv-prob with different subnets [SOLVED]
Hello all,
The prob is solved. The dns-answer only seemed to come from the asked
nameserver. Between the two endpoints of the vpn the gateways have a
transparent dns-proxy which forwarded my dns-request not the wanted
dns-server but sent not-found-answers pretending to be the intended ns.
Not easy to find such a pitfall :(
Thanks again,
-Peter
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Peter
2014 Aug 29
1
Samba 4 dns-resolv-prob with different subnets
Hello,
I?m using one Samba4-dc ?d-02? (IP 192.168.1.100) on subnet (192.168.1.0).
Internal dns works for clients and other servers at subnet 192.168.1.0.
Now I want to join another dc ?dc-01? (IP 192.168.0.101) at subnet
192.168.0.0 which is connect over routed openvpn. Ping the first dc an vice
versa works but ?host ?v dc-02? results in the following message:
Trying ?dc-02?
Host
2015 Apr 21
4
sernet = dead?
> On 21/04/15 09:17, Peter Grotz - Obel und Partner GbR wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> >
> >
> > samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually doesn?t take a lot
> > of time to release their new packages.
> >
> > But now we haven?t heard a peep from them. Are they gone or will there be
> > another fine release?
> >
> >
2015 Apr 21
2
sernet = dead?
Hallo,
samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually doesn?t take a lot
of time to release their new packages.
But now we haven?t heard a peep from them. Are they gone or will there be
another fine release?
In great expectation of a fine new sernet-samba-package-release
-Peter
2015 Apr 21
5
sernet = dead?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The packages are online :-)
Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle:
> thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on
> jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today.
>
>
> Gr,
>
> Louis
>
>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
>>
2018 Dec 12
5
error with joining new DC to domain
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:01:52 +0100
"peter.grotz--- via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Thanks Rowland for your answer.
>
> these are sernet-packages from their subscription.
>
> There are 4 DCs (all with last sernet-rpms) 2 are demoted with probs
> (dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on
> centos 7)
>
>
2018 Dec 12
0
error with joining new DC to domain
Thanks Rowloand for the hint!
I installed sernet-samba 4.7 and give it a try. Now I get:
[root at dc-12 1]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC --realm=obel.lan -Uadministrator
Finding a writeable DC for domain 'obel.lan'
Found DC dc-11.obel.lan
Password for [OBEL\administrator]:
workgroup is OBEL
realm is obel.lan
Adding CN=DC-12,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan
Adding
2018 Dec 12
0
error with joining new DC to domain
may I extend the issue with some strange behaviour? Look here:
installing the sernet 4.7 as mentioned above I can´t join the domain in a regular way. ONLY it works when I asked BOTH of the working DCs with 4.9.3 before I try without explicit naming of a server... ^^
Follow me here:
[root at dc-02 etc]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC -U"OBEL\administrator" --realm=obel.lan
2018 Dec 12
2
error with joining new DC to domain
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:43:09 +0100
peter grotz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I forgot: this is samba 4.9.3 on centos 7
Where did you get Samba 4.9.3 from ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join
> I get the following:
What are the other DC(s) ?
Rowland
2018 Dec 12
3
error with joining new DC to domain
Hello,
I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join I get the following:
[root at dc-12 etc]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC -Uadministrator --server=dc-11
Password for [OBEL\administrator]:
workgroup is OBEL
realm is obel.lan
Adding CN=DC-12,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan
Adding
2014 Aug 26
1
Samba 4 fsmo-handling on crashed dc-server
Hallo,
we have two dcs in one domain which is located in separate subnets. These
subnets are connected by a routed vpn.
How must I handle fsmo roles when one of these dcs fails and will maybe be
repaired and reconnected?
A transfer of the fsmo roles is not possible until the dc is repaired, so
should the fsmos be seized from the other dc? Can anybody give me a hint how
to handle this
2015 Apr 21
0
sernet = dead?
thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on jessie fine. ( from source )
Did that today.
Gr,
Louis
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
>Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2015 16:51
>Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sernet = dead?
>
2015 Apr 21
0
sernet = dead?
On 21/04/15 16:06, Stefan Kania wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The packages are online :-)
>
> Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle:
>> thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on
>> jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today.
>>
>>
>> Gr,
>>
>> Louis
>>
>>
2013 Jun 24
1
Deprecation notice on custom type?
Deprecation notice: Resource references should now be capitalized on
line 101 in file /etc/puppet/manifests/templates/basenode.pp
This is the specific line of code:
realize (users::useraccount[hiera(''users'')])
When I capitalize Users, I get the following error:
Error 400 on SERVER: Could not parse for environment production: Syntax
error at
2018 Dec 12
0
error with joining new DC to domain
Thanks Rowland for your answer.
these are sernet-packages from their subscription.
There are 4 DCs (all with last sernet-rpms) 2 are demoted with probs
(dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on
centos 7)
dc-11 has all fsmo. joining with the old dc-01 and dc-02 doesn´t even
work.
dc-01 joins but gives me this:
Deleted
2024 Oct 28
1
Member server plus local accounts - can it be done?
On 10/28/24 9:51 AM, lists--- via samba wrote:
> But we also have ancient systems, that use a local useraccount from the
> dataserver to put data on it.
> So, is something like:
> ??????? realm = REALM.TLD
> ??????? security = ADS
> ??????? server role = member server
> ??????? username map = /etc/samba/user.map
> ??????? winbind refresh tickets = Yes
> ???????
2024 Oct 28
4
Member server plus local accounts - can it be done?
Good morning list,
due to several changes we have to move from a pure local-users scenario
to a member server scenario for our "public" data servers ("public" in
terms of "all members of the chair" and "all machines").
The member server is running, managing access via group memberships
works. We can't add any account to the ad, as we are only a user
2014 May 19
0
Samba How to kill the locked files from a useraccount by multiple smbd pids
Hello,
I would like to how to do to kill the locked files from a useraccount by multiple smbd pids automatically when the session is closed?
####
Details Samba server:
Release: 5.10
Kernel architecture: sun4u
Application architecture: sparc
Hardware provider: Sun_Microsystems
Kernel version: SunOS 5.10 Generic_142909-17
Samba version:
Samba version 3.5.6
Smb.conf file section Global:
#
2019 Jan 21
3
force re-authentication when accessing different shares
hello & thx for your fast response!
i need a way to create samba shares without creating system user accounts:
- add users via smbpasswd with unique password
- no need for a corresponding useraccount in /etc/passwd
- access to the corresponding shares should be independent from any domain
(i.e. the share should be accessable
via windows client)
to come around the useraccount-restriction (as
2008 Oct 29
0
Installation: not creating necessary directories
I have tried installing R on a web server on which I have a user
account but not root access.
I checked and the PERL, Fortran, etc. prerequisites all seem in order.
The compiling of R with:
% ./configure --with-x=no
This works fine without errors.
I try a "make check", however, and soon get an error as it cannot find
files which should have been made. Most of the files seem to