similar to: samba-check-db-script python failure

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "samba-check-db-script python failure"

2015 Apr 23
3
samba-check-db-script python failure
I went and got the newest (upped recently) script. No love. I removed the email address line to get more command line output. root at dc01:~# ./samba-check-db-repl.sh Running with with console output Running : /usr/bin/samba-tool ldapcmp --filter='whenChanged' ldap://dc01 ldap://dc02.dtsh***m.dt. Please wait.. this can take a while.. Failed to bind - LDAP error 49
2015 Apr 24
3
samba-check-db-script python failure
I upped 1.0.4 of the script.. I added checks if no DC's are found, error message and exits script, so no python errors anymore, if i did it right. ;-) on both DC's do the following. and whats the output of : cat /etc/hosts cat /etc/resolv.conf and kinit Administrator SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` SETHOSTNAME=`hostname -s` SERVER_IP_ADRESS=`hostname -i` echo "Test domainname:
2015 Apr 23
0
samba-check-db-script python failure
On 23/04/15 16:22, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > I went and got the newest (upped recently) script. No love. > > I removed the email address line to get more command line output. > > root at dc01:~# ./samba-check-db-repl.sh > Running with with console output > Running : /usr/bin/samba-tool ldapcmp --filter='whenChanged' ldap://dc01 >
2019 Jun 25
2
One DC cannot authenticate off of another DC
Hello Samba Friends, I have a single DC (we'll call it, "DC1") that simply will not take my password when I run this command:? #samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc2 ldap://dc3 -Uadministrator? Or this command:? #samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc1 ldap://dc2 -Uadministrator? I basically get this:? > Password for [SAMDOM\administrator]:? > Password for [SAMDOM\administrator]:?
2017 Jun 21
4
DRS stopped working after upgrade from debian Jessie to Stretch
21.06.2017 11:45, L.P.H. van Belle via samba пишет: > I suggest before you upgrade do a very good read here. > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba#Notable_Enhancements_and_Changes > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Features_added/changed_(by_release) > And a summerize version for with all parameter changes as of upgrade from 4.2 up to 4.6 >
2015 Apr 24
0
samba-check-db-script python failure
Hai Bob. SETDNSDOMAIN='hostname -d' needs to be: SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` .. so change them all . SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` SETHOSTNAME=`hostname -s` SERVER_IP_ADDRESS=`hostname -i` and you can ignore : >[....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: >127.0.0.1#953: connection refused > >. ok > >[ ok ] Starting domain name service...:
2015 Apr 20
2
big fingers, bad
My big fingers have gotten me into trouble (all be it minor, I think.) I have had a single DC and member server working for a few weeks and decided to move forward setup the second DC. When I set the hostname I inadvertently added an addition letter into the name. Unfortunately I discovered this after I had run "samba-check-db-repl.sh" which follows the script
2015 Apr 23
0
samba-check-db-script python failure
Hai Bob, ah.. LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS, this is not a python error, but password error.. ;-) i upped a new version of samba-check-db-repl.sh ( direct link : https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/samba-check-db-repl.sh) small change in the install of the mail tools section. A bit info for this version. ## Version : 1.0.3 ## release d.d. : 22-04-2015 ## moved mailx part within checks if an
2019 Jun 26
4
One DC cannot authenticate off of another DC
Thank you, Louis, for your reply. By simply asking me to provide outputs of the aforementioned files, I found the cause of my first problem (auth failing). It was my /etc/hosts file on dc1. All of them should look like this, and indeed DC2 and DC3's *did* look like this: # cat /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 ? ? ? localhost.samdom.mycompany.net ?localhost > 192.168.3.201
2017 Apr 22
3
checking replication after Samba update
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 08:47:53 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2017-04-22 07:36, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > > I have updated from Samba 4.5.0 to 4.6.2 on my second DC and all > > appears good, so far. > > > > On the "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba" [1 [1]] > > page
2015 Jul 16
2
4.2.2 as AD with 2 DCs: database incoherency
Am 16.07.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 16/07/15 13:27, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 16.07.2015 um 14:02 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> /etc/hosts should be: >>> >>> 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost >> >> uhm no - you want 127.0.0.1 normally resolved to localhost and hence >> 127.0.0.1 localhost
2019 Jun 26
4
Samba 4.10 member: SMB login no longer working
Hai, And Omg... Your right, its my fault. :-/ I didnt say to you, you needed make the changes, to change what Rowland showed. Im really sorry.. ;-) when im in austria i'll buy you a beer. Or if you want teach you snowboarding.. I have an other guy in austria that cant ski/board. Im going to teach him also. .. So funny a dutch guy teaching to austria guys.. :-) And how is it running
2015 Sep 01
2
ldapcmp issue
Hi all, It seems "samba-tool ldapcmp" does not support too much items in Samba's database. Playing for a while with DB I was never able to run ldapcmp successfully. So yesterday I installed a platform to fill piece by piece my two small DCs and to run ldapcmp. The process follows. Test platform: 2 DCs using Debian 8.1 "net install" with only system tools, up to date,
2019 Apr 06
5
DsReplicaSync failed - WERR_LOGON_FAILURE // Failed to bind to uuid for ncacn_ip_tcp - NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
Am Sa., 6. Apr. 2019 um 18:01 Uhr schrieb Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 17:21:26 +0200 > Martin Krämer <mk.maddin at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello Rowland, > > > > thanks for your help. > > Below my comments > > > > See here: > > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/ > > >
2016 Nov 17
3
group policy update fails
We can login just fine but Group Policy Update is throwing an error gpupdate Updating Policy... User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encount ered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not determine if the user a nd computer accounts are in the same forest. Ensure the user domain name matches the name of a trusted domain that resides in
2015 Jul 23
2
4.2.2 as AD with 2 DCs: database incoherency
On 23/07/15 16:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried "samba-tool ldapcmp" several times to solve this issue, without > success. > > On DC acting as full FSMO: > dc20:~# samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc00.ad.dgfip.lan > ldap://dc20.ad.dgfip.lan domain > ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - ldb_wait: Time limit exceeded (3) > File
2019 May 22
2
dsdb_access Access check failed on CN=Configuration
All- I've got 3 DCs (version 4.9.6-12) that, prior to today, were running without issue (as best I could tell). Every night I run a few commands to monitor the status of the DCs/domain. I run: * dbcheck --cross-ncs * samba-tool drs kcc <other DCs> * samba-tool ldapcmp <local DC> <other DCs> (domain|configuration|schema|dnsdomain|dnsforest) * samba-tool drs showrepl These
2017 Apr 22
2
checking replication after Samba update
I have updated from Samba 4.5.0 to 4.6.2 on my second DC and all appears good, so far. On the "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba" [1] page of the documentation in section "Updating Multiple Samba Domain Controllers". The last line " . . . and always verify that the replication is working correctly." The replication discussed here. Is this the
2019 May 22
2
dsdb_access Access check failed on CN=Configuration
----- On May 22, 2019, at 10:01 AM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > Try again with : > > samba-tool ldapcmp dc5.$(hostname -d) dc3.$(hostname -d) DNSFOREST > As in dc5.your.dns.domain.tld ... > > Whats the result.? The failure is still present -- no change in the output of the command: # samba-tool ldapcmp dc3.domain.local dc5.domain.local DNSFOREST ERROR(ldb):
2019 Sep 03
2
4.9.12 operation unavailable without authentication
I have Samba in production (4.9.6-12 on Ubuntu 18.04) which is working well. However, we are several releases behind so I am gearing up to upgrade to the latest 4.9 release. As part of the preparations (and for other reasons), I spun up an upgraded DC cluster in our development environment (4.9.12-15 on Ubuntu 18.04). The initial setup seemed to work and now I have two DCs that appear to be