similar to: sernet = dead?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The packages are online :-) Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on > jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. > > > Gr, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >>

Hallo, samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually doesn?t take a lot of time to release their new packages. But now we haven?t heard a peep from them. Are they gone or will there be another fine release? In great expectation of a fine new sernet-samba-package-release -Peter

thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. Gr, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2015 16:51 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sernet = dead? >

On 21/04/15 16:06, Stefan Kania wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The packages are online :-) > > Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: >> thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on >> jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. >> >> >> Gr, >> >> Louis >> >>

Hello, I?m using one Samba4-dc ?d-02? (IP 192.168.1.100) on subnet (192.168.1.0). Internal dns works for clients and other servers at subnet 192.168.1.0. Now I want to join another dc ?dc-01? (IP 192.168.0.101) at subnet 192.168.0.0 which is connect over routed openvpn. Ping the first dc an vice versa works but ?host ?v dc-02? results in the following message: Trying ?dc-02? Host

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:01:52 +0100 "peter.grotz--- via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks Rowland for your answer. > > these are sernet-packages from their subscription. > > There are 4 DCs (all with last sernet-rpms) 2 are demoted with probs > (dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on > centos 7) > >

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:43:09 +0100 peter grotz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I forgot: this is samba 4.9.3 on centos 7 Where did you get Samba 4.9.3 from ? > > Thanks > > > Hello, > > I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join > I get the following: What are the other DC(s) ? Rowland

Hello, I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join I get the following: [root at dc-12 etc]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC -Uadministrator --server=dc-11 Password for [OBEL\administrator]: workgroup is OBEL realm is obel.lan Adding CN=DC-12,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding

Hallo, we have two dcs in one domain which is located in separate subnets. These subnets are connected by a routed vpn. How must I handle fsmo roles when one of these dcs fails and will maybe be repaired and reconnected? A transfer of the fsmo roles is not possible until the dc is repaired, so should the fsmos be seized from the other dc? Can anybody give me a hint how to handle this

see: To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba ;-) -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: klang at countyofdane.com [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Klang, Marvin Verzonden: woensdag 15 april 2015 22:02 Aan: 'kseeger at samba.org'; 'samba-announce at lists.samba.org';

===================================================================== "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes." Benjamin Franklin ===================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.2. Changes since 4.2.0: -------------------- o

===================================================================== "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes." Benjamin Franklin ===================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.2. Changes since 4.2.0: -------------------- o

Hello all, The prob is solved. The dns-answer only seemed to come from the asked nameserver. Between the two endpoints of the vpn the gateways have a transparent dns-proxy which forwarded my dns-request not the wanted dns-server but sent not-found-answers pretending to be the intended ns. Not easy to find such a pitfall :( Thanks again, -Peter -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peter

Confusing. Github says that is open. Ok. My mistake. The question remains why the Windows clients allow login for an expired certificate despite a correctly loaded CRL. What is the purpose of specifying the CRL in smb.conf? It seems to me that the smartcard login is not really reliable. Then my users still have to log in with password. For now, as long as 4.19 is not yet released. Hans

Hallo and Merry Christmas to all! I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2. The repo isn?t available any more, so can anybody help me here? Thanks in advance! Peter

On 20/07/2023 09:37, Hans Schulze via samba wrote: > I found an old bugzilla report for this behavior: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9612 > > According to the statements in it, there was a patch already in version > 4.16 and in heimdal 8 last year? Which option must be in the krb5.conf? Sorry, but I read it slightly differently, there was a patch available,

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) > Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. > > In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: > > > > [2016/09/29 22:36:58.862575, 0] > > ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4402(widelinks_warning) > > Share 'IPC$'

> On 2/16/2015 10:14 AM, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>> My apologies for being too new to this whole process... >>> >>> Server was AIX 5.3/Samba 2.2.7, authenticating only against the AD. No >>> single sign-on, kerberos, or LDAP to my knowledge; smbd processes never >>> load kerberos or LDAP libraries. Upgraded to AIX 7.1/Samba 3.3.12, which >>>

>> From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> >> To: samba at lists.samba.org >> Date: 02/25/2015 02:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [Samba] Workgroup name too long >> Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >> >> >> >> Am 25.02.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Miguel Medalha: >>>> I have searched for this and the solutions I found were

> > Good morning. > > I am looking to resolve the above vulnerability on our T-4 Solaris boxes. I have not worked or patch Samba before and not sure of the process. > > When I find and apply the patch will it resolve the issue on the version that we are running or do I need to bring our current version more up to date? > > Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.