similar to: Idmap RID back end on Samba 4.2.1

> I tried it and it did not work the same as winbindd on a memberserver. > I still got UIDs starting with 3.000.000 > Thank you for your answer. I am asking because at the moment I don't have a spare machine to test it. Of course you did include "-winbind +winbindd" in a "server services" line in smb.conf, didn't you? Well, my systems work well as they

Hello Stefan, I learned the hard way about .local. I understand going forward. I do have an issue with the member server. Following along with the wiki I get stuck at 'Testing the Winbind user/group mapping'. Wbinfo works as expected but not #*id DomainUser* #*getent passwd* #*getent group* #*chown DomainUser:DomainGroup file* #*chgrp DomainGroup file* etc. I receive

Hello Stefan, Yes I'm using Samba4 as my DC's. I also provisioned my DC's with RFC2307. [global] netbios name = PFMS1 workgroup = DOMAIN security = ADS realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL encrypt passwords = yes vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = yes store dos attributes = yes idmap config *:backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 70001-80000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, after I joined an new machine into my domain, "getent group" is not showing any domaingroup. The domainusers are listet with "getent passwd" as expected. In nsswitch.conf winbind is used with "passwd" and "group". Wbinfo -g shows all groups. "net rpc testjoin" gives the right result. I can get

I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be made? After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned to the rid backend and voil?! all my problems are gone. Having to manually edit uids/gids in UNIX Attributes under RSAT

Hi, I am trying to mount fileserver (samba, 10.20.30.16) shares on a linux domain member server, where I logged on via ssh using AD my credentials. I am unable to get past the "mount error(126): Required key not available" error message. I have read and googled a lot, and could use some help. See this: > domainuser at memberserver-45:~$ sudo tail -f /var/log/debug & >

I just tried that and I got the same error. I think there is some extended acl support that I'm missing somewhere. It's like the setfacl command is not recognizing the AD groups as valid groups. I should also add the following information: This server is built up on CentOS 6.6 Minimal using the Sernet-Samba Enterprise packages. It looks like the binary that is running is

As stated in subject. I suppose in 'DC mode' no, but as DM i can define an alias for the machine? Looking at: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 seems 'yes' to me... Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078

Hello everybody, I am trying to use the backend = rid but it is not showing me group information of the users after adding the user to the domain groups... What should I do to have the full group info for the users available? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid # All domain's user accounts and groups are automatically available on the domain member. root at s4ad01:~#

> > Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it > isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head > around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have > problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. > Do you have something against the rid backend? Which disavantadges do

Today I upgraded two AD DCs to Samba 4.60. All looks well. I noticed greater speed in some areas. When I run "testparm", the output contains the following: idmap range not specified for domain '*' ERROR: Invalid idmap range for domain *! "samba-tool testparm" does not output this. I remember that some efforts were put into unifying the behavior of these tools.

On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 16:14 +0100, mj via samba wrote: > We haved used it on a domain member server, yes. > > Only one thing: when you have a compteraccount memberserver$ in your AD, > you cannot use "memberserver" as an alias on another machine) And you should register any such alias as a servicePrincpalName. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett

Am 22.02.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 20:05 +0000, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much >> underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be >> made? >> >> After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a >> Samba Active Directory

> with a samba 4.2.1 AD DC you automatically use the separate 'winbindd' > deamon and the 'winbind' deamon built into the samba daemon should be > ignored. There is no way that I know to 'disable' the winbind built into > samba, but there is a way to turn it on and turn off 'winbindd', which > is the way I suggested. > The Samba 4.2 release

Hello, I'm following along with the wiki(Setup a Samba AD Member Server) and I have a question after reading the 'Set up a basic smb.conf' section. Do I need to extend the schema in order for my member server to successfully join and service file shares? Do I need to configure a krb5.conf file? Thanks. -- -James

Hi, I tried to configure the new idmap interface. Currently without much success. I have two samba domains, trusting each other. Each PDC using it's own LDAP server. I tried idmap domains = DOM1, DOM2 idmap config DOM1:default = yes idmap config DOM1:backend = ldap idmap config DOM1:ldap_base_dn = ou=Idmap,dc=dom1,dc=mydomain,dc=de idmap config

> Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it > isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head > around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have > problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. What kind of problems can you have? I did it with these lines: idmap config *

Hi, I'm trying to make a "pure ldap" setup, whereas users, groups, id mappings and everything that is supported with LDAP be in the LDAP tree and managed directly by samba. That is, I'm using: ldapsam:trusted = yes ldapsam:editposix = yes And NOT using smbldap-*. My smb.conf is here: http://wiki.clueless.com.ar/SambaLdap/smb.conf-PDC I created the LDAP tree root

> Comment from Rowland: > [...]an AD user without a uidNumber is merely a windows user Hi Rowland, just for my understanding, I have a question. If a domain user in my samba4 AD domain does not have been assigned with a "uid" on the [UNIX Attribute] tab of my ADUC tool, that user in general *cannot* access any of the shares of that particular member server? Is that correct? My

Let me be the first (maybe): CentOS 5.2 is here (at least): http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/ Thank you all who worked on it! -------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 22-06-2008 7:52