similar to: Samba 4.2.0: Group write permission not honored

>>> Hello Thomas >>> >>> Am 06.04.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Thomas Schulz: >>>> For anyone considering using Samba 4.2.0, be aware that there is a >>>> problem with group write permission not being honored. >>>> >>>> This is seen on both Linux and Solaris. We have a setup where we have >>>> project directory trees

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von:schulz at adi.com <schulz at adi.com> > Gesendet: Mon 6 April 2015 19:17 > An: mmuehlfeld at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.2.0: Group write permission not honored > > > Hello Thomas > > > > Am 06.04.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Thomas Schulz: > > > For anyone considering using

For anyone considering using Samba 4.2.0, be aware that there is a problem with group write permission not being honored. This is seen on both Linux and Solaris. We have a setup where we have project directory trees where the files are owned by various users but also by a group that the various users are a member of. The group permissions are set to allow group write access. With Samba 4.1.* and

>>> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>>> This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show >>>> the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. >>>> >>>> We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. >>>> We are setting 'password server =

> > On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > > This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show > > > the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. > > > > > > We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. > > > We are setting 'password server = starfish2'

> Submitted bug 11098. Debug level 5 logs are attached to the bug along > with the smb.conf file used. > > I am assuming that the problem is with the Wondows 2000 DC because I > assume that 4.2.0rc4 would not have been made available if it could > not authenticate against any domain controller. > > For us this is a fatal bug. > > > This problem shows up on both

> Hi! > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:25:45PM +0000, Briar Jim wrote: > > Hi all. I'm trying to install Samba 4.2.0 on a Solaris 64 bit Unix > > server by doing the following but the configure script fails with > > "Couldn't determine size of 'bool'", any ideas ? :- > > Solaris 10? I just checked, it seems to work on Solaris 11. >

Adding a section of a debug level 5 log at the end that looks like it might have some usefull information. > This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show > the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. > > We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. > We are setting 'password server = starfish2' dispite the

This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. We are setting 'password server = starfish2' dispite the fact that the documentation says that this in not necessary as we have found it to be necessary. We are setting 'workgroup =

>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:14:44 -0400 (EDT) >> schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote: >> >>>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) >>>> Thomas Schulz via samba &lt;samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. >>>>> In the logs for a few client machines I

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:14:44 -0400 (EDT) > schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) > > > Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. > > > > In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: >

Forwarded to respective mailing lists Regards, Lutz ----- Forwarded message from Thomas Schulz <schulz at adi.com> ----- X-Original-To: jaenicke at serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de X-Original-To: rt at aet.tu-cottbus.de Delivered-To: rt at master.openssl.org Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:42:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Schulz <schulz at adi.com> To: openssl-bugs at openssl.org Subject: 0.9.8a:

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) > Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. > > In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: > > > > [2016/09/29 22:36:58.862575, 0] > > ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4402(widelinks_warning) > > Share 'IPC$'

HI all, My I am trying to convert character date (mm/dd/yy) to YYYY-mm-dd date format in one of the columns of my data file. The first few lines of the data file looks like as follow head(Atest,10);dim(Atest) ddate 1 19/08/21 2 30/04/18 3 28/08/21 4 11/10/21 5 07/09/21 6 15/08/21 7 03/09/21 8 23/07/18 9 17/08/20 10 23/09/20 [1] 1270076 1 I am using the following

On 10/08/2019 13:14, amitkuma--- via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to use samba-tool to create OU on active directory. > > 1. Joined to domain. > # net ads join -U <> > > 2. Listed GPO's on domain to check samba-tool script can pull the GPOs. > # samba-tool gpo listall > GPO : <> > display name : test-Computers-GPO-1 > path

Hello, I am trying to use samba-tool to create OU on active directory. 1. Joined to domain. # net ads join -U <> 2. Listed GPO's on domain to check samba-tool script can pull the GPOs. # samba-tool gpo listall GPO : <> display name : test-Computers-GPO-1 path : \\atest.com\SysVol\atest.com\Policies\<> dn :

> On 26/10/15 18:26, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > This may not be a Samba problem, but perhaps people here know the answer. > > > > We are installing some Windows 8.1 Pro computers. The servers running Samba > > 4.2.19 and 4.3.0 are not showing up in the Network display. Our domain > > controller is also not showing up. The Windows 7 computers are showing up. > >

>> On 26/10/15 18:26, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>> This may not be a Samba problem, but perhaps people here know the answer. >>> >>> We are installing some Windows 8.1 Pro computers. The servers running Samba >>> 4.2.19 and 4.3.0 are not showing up in the Network display. Our domain >>> controller is also not showing up. The Windows 7 computers are

> On 2/16/2015 10:14 AM, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>> My apologies for being too new to this whole process... >>> >>> Server was AIX 5.3/Samba 2.2.7, authenticating only against the AD. No >>> single sign-on, kerberos, or LDAP to my knowledge; smbd processes never >>> load kerberos or LDAP libraries. Upgraded to AIX 7.1/Samba 3.3.12, which >>>

I joined a Fedora Linux box running Samba 4.1.5 to a Windows Server 2000 domain controller as an additional domain controller with the command: samba-tool domain join adi.com DC -Uadministrator --realm=adi.com --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ The messages indicated that this was mostly sucessfull with the exception of the message: NO DNS zone information found in source domain, not replicating DNS