similar to: Question about domain name with BIND9_DLZ

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Question about domain name with BIND9_DLZ"

2015 Apr 18
2
Question about domain name with BIND9_DLZ
Thanks for you answer. My OS are Debian 7u8 as server, and Windows 7 as client. I'm doing the test on virtual machines and the dhcp server is a simple router. Anyway i'm using a static IP: iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 gateway 192.168.1.1 dns-nameservers
2015 Apr 18
2
Question about domain name with BIND9_DLZ
Thanks!! I've restored the server, i've installed all from backports to start in a clean configuration, and I've tried the suggestions but i've got the same result. The Windows machine is using the router dhcp server, but dns are configured manually to use the server as dns. Anyway I can live with that because I can log using HOME\User and works fine. Only was curiosity.
2018 Jul 31
3
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try > to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start. > > Let's just recap > > You have run 'samba_upgradedns' > You have altered smb.conf > You have configured 'named.conf' correctly > The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this
2015 Apr 18
0
Question about domain name with BIND9_DLZ
On 18/04/15 12:11, Daniel Carrasco Mar?n wrote: > Hi, first of all i'm sorry for my english. > > I'm doing some tests to migrate a Samba3 domain to Samba4 with BIND9_DLZ, > but the Domain name in Windows information is not correct. Is not a problem > because all works as expected, but i wan't to know if i'm doing something > wrong that can cause problems in
2015 Apr 18
0
Question about domain name with BIND9_DLZ
On 18/04/15 13:03, Daniel Carrasco Mar?n wrote: > Thanks for you answer. > > My OS are Debian 7u8 as server, and Windows 7 as client. If you enable wheezy backports, you can install bind9.9.5 and will not have to compile it yourself. > I'm doing the test on virtual machines and the dhcp server is a simple > router. Anyway i'm using a static IP: > iface eth0 inet
2015 Apr 18
0
Question about domain name with BIND9_DLZ
On 18/04/15 14:42, Daniel Carrasco Mar?n wrote: > Thanks!! > > I've restored the server, i've installed all from backports to start > in a clean configuration, and I've tried the suggestions but i've got > the same result. The Windows machine is using the router dhcp server, > but dns are configured manually to use the server as dns. If the windows machines
2018 Jan 02
5
Switching from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ
Hello,     Installing bind9 on my Ubuntu 14.04 via. apt-get displays the following options.  #named -V BIND 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.16-Ubuntu (Extended Support Version) <id:f9b8a50e> built by make with '--prefix=/usr' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--enable-threads'
2018 Jul 30
4
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
It is part of the Sernet packages and is currently on 1.3.4 /usr/lib64/samba/libldb.so.1.3.4 We started using sernet-samba-ad from v4 using the internal dns and updated as versions were released. We have now recently updated from 4.8.2 to 4.8.3 and still using internal dns. Our DNS is working as it should, it's only been since recently that we have to migrate to bind9. On Mon, Jul 30, 2018
2016 May 26
2
samba4 on centos 7 won't promote to dc
Hello everyone I have successfully deployed samba 4.4.2 on Centos7 as PDC. I had to use BIND9_DLZ because samba_internal was not working. I have successfully joined win7 machine to a domain and with RSAT I can add user, GP etc.. This was all possible but with a more than a few tweaks but I have some questions. But at this time only one is bugging me crazy. 1. When I configure the makefile of
2018 Jan 02
1
Switching from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ
On 1/2/2018 12:25 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 12:09:33 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>     Installing bind9 on my Ubuntu 14.04 via. apt-get displays the >> following options. >> >>  #named -V >> BIND 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.16-Ubuntu (Extended Support Version) >>
2018 Jan 02
1
Switching from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ
On 1/2/2018 12:25 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 12:09:33 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>     Installing bind9 on my Ubuntu 14.04 via. apt-get displays the >> following options. >> >>  #named -V >> BIND 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.16-Ubuntu (Extended Support Version) >>
2014 Dec 29
2
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Hello , review bind9 options ... >> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: starting BIND 9.9.5-7-Debian -u >> bind -4 >> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: built with '--prefix=/usr' >> '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' >> '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--enable-threads'
2014 Dec 29
2
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Dear Rowland , Just keep in mind that the Debian RPI maintated by rasperry.org PI fellows and _not_ mainly by the Mainsteam debian pkg maintainers, and ways behind the main distro - allmost. > > Even though there is no mention of dlopen, samba_dlz works. > yes/no ->> its not displaying the DLZ file open <<- and that happen even on my now +1J old samba4.0 RPI samba4 ad.
2018 Jun 30
3
BIND9_DLZ: TKEY is unacceptable - depending on the name server
Dear Samba experts, Since a couple of days I am trying to fix my domain. I have each two ADDCs on raspis on two sites. One is running on Raspian and works fine. The other three are on Gentoo and something is broken there. When I point the name resolution in resolv.conf to the Raspian machine the dynamic updates are just working fine: # horus /srv/samba/demoshare # samba_dnsupdate --verbose
2014 Dec 29
5
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Dear Roland, and here we have one reasons / prove regarding Debian and current Samba BIND DLZ issues : http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/bind9/bind9_9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u3_changelog MSG >> " * disable dlz until we get a patch to make it build again" Well Debian Maintainers seems seeking missing the dlz patches that RHEL & SLES maintainers created
2015 May 05
2
4.2.1 ./configure --sbindir & --bindir settings is different from binary?
Hi, I'm getting further in building Samba 4.2.1 . It's apparently not as simple as sudo ./configure && make && make install. At the moment it looks like make is ignoring some directory settings during configuration. I've run ./configure as follows: sudo ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --with-piddir=/var/run/samba
2020 Nov 05
2
vfs_snapper is enabled but prerequisite dbus-1 package not found.
Hi, I'm trying to configure samba 4.13.2 bot receive this messages Checking for dbus : not found vfs_snapper is enabled but prerequisite dbus-1 package not found. Use --with-shared-modules=!vfs_snapper to disable vfs_snapper support. (complete log in /srv/samba-4.13.2/bin/config.log) What is wrong?? try this: ./configure --enable-fhs --prefix=/usr --sbindir=/usr/sbin
2020 Jun 15
2
BIND9_DLZ with Ubuntu 20.04
On Ubuntu 20.04 I have provisioned a AD DC using samba-4.12 from Louis' Repo and his instructions: https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/full-howto-Ubuntu18.04-samba-AD_DC.txt In the output of: samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --realm=XXX.XXX --domain=XXX --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --adminpass=XXXxxx I see this: WARNING /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/provision/sambadns.py
2019 Jan 22
4
Samba BIND9_DLZ autoupdate PTR
Set auth-nxdomain yes; And stop/start bind9 Other source : https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2015/09/10/a-description-of-the-dns-dynamic-update-message-format/ /snap The DNS Client and Server services support the use of dynamic updates, as described in Request for Comments (RFC) 2136, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System." The DNS Server service allows dynamic
2013 Apr 09
3
Problem building powerdns from EPEL
Hi, I just tried to build using http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/pdns-3.1-2.el6.src.rpm on CentOS 6.4 final (kernel: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64), but it failed when looking for ldap libs: Note: I did not change anything in the original spec file. ... + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu