similar to: network collapse

based on what your saying.. im not thinking this is samba related. I guess check your switches and find the "fault" autosense for your nics.. You can use thisone to disable autosence ethtool -s ethX autoneg off en set correct nic speed. ethtool -s ethX speed XXXX BUT ! check your switches first. greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: sambait3 at

Dear All, I have an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B NIC. from lspci -vv : 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) It is detected, but why the speed is always 100Mbps, already change cable but still no luck. I use ethtool and from the output it seems that system know that this NIC support gigabit speed : ???????

I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather than gigE. I've swapped ports and cables with a different server,

How much of an impact can/does local network traffic have on call quality? Would opening large files on local servers affect call quality? We are running QoS on the router but that will only prioritize traffic in/out of the network.

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

I want to check the speed like features of my Ethernet in dom0 and domUs. But in virtualized environment it gives strange output why is that so? how to check it otherwise? Non-virtualized FC11 [root@fasiha home]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0:     Supported ports: [ TP ]     Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full                             100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full    

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

We have an HP DL360 server with dual on-board Tigon3 ethernet cards. We are using eth0, eth1 is unused at the moment. Sometimes when the network interface is under heavy load, for example moving large file transfers over rsync or NFS, the network interface stops working and we lose all connection to the server. The only solution at this point is to jump on the console and restart the network

CentOS 6.2......... Why do the physical interfaces report (correctly) that they're negotiated at 1000Mb/s, but when I `cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0` I get 100Mbps for the member interfaces, and when I ` mii-tool bond0` I get 10Mbps for the bond? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ethtool em1 Settings for em1: Supported ports: [

I have the xensource 3.1.0 x86_64 tarball installed over a RHEL5 clone distribution. The "ethtool" utility only returns the following information: [root@fermigrid5 etc]# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Link detected: yes [root@fermigrid5 etc]# Since I have no vanilla-installed rhel5 machines with which to compare, I am not sure if I am dealing with a bug in the ethtool (whose

anyone know how to force network cards talk at gig speeds when all it wants to do is establish a connection at 100mbits root at host1 [/backup/cpbackup/daily]# mii-tool eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok eth1: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5721 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 11) Subsystem: Broadcom

On 2015-04-16 11:26, sambait3 at fuckaround.org wrote: > Hi folks > > on debian stable I've a default samba file sharing config. Everything > works perfectly (almost...) - samba version 3.6.6 > > From linux and windows clients (wired and wifi too) when I (i.e. listen > musics) often (one time every 4/5 minutes) networks suddenly collapse (for > less one second) and

Hello everyone: Over the past few years I have been a happy samba user, running samba on Redhat / FC platforms. Recently I upgraded hardware, and Samba hasn't been performing well at all.. which makes me sad :-( The new hardware is Asus P5B board with a dual-core intel processor. This board has an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B gigabit ethernet controller, which was a hassle to setup.

I''m trying to build out a test cloud using XCP 1.0.0 beta with 3 machines of 18 cores total (Phenom II 1090s). I''ve built three machines, installed XCP 1.0.0 beta on them and they all three have the same problem - the Realtek network cards don''t work. The following is the output from lspci 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI

On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these: $ rpm -ql net-tools

I am trying to connect two workstations (CentOS 3&4) directly using a straight through cat 5e cable with a crossover adapter on one of the ends. Both hosts have gigabit-capable ethernet card. According to lspci host 1 has: 03:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) and host 2 has: 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group

Dovid Bender writes: > Just guessing I would verify that the out of : iptables -L -nv > Shows no dropped packets, try disabling selinux as well as look at the > limits of the asterisk pid (cat /proc/<Asterisk PID>/limits). I know the > defualt for rhel is 1024 which was never enough for us. Thanks for the hints. Selinux is disabled, there is no outgoing firewall (anymore)

I am having an extremely strange issue with a BL460c1 (G1) blade on a c7000 enclosure. I could not for the life of me get the machine to ping the gateway or any other blade on the same enclosure (yes, the subnet mask was correct & quadruple-checked); although pinging to the local IP works. I was almost convinced that it was a network or hardware issue; until I asked someone to try

Hi! Maybe, I found a bug of xen. My system: - domain0 - gentoo - xen-devel-3.0, kernel 2.6.12.5-r1 - domain1 - debian - kernel 2.6.12.5-r1 (2 interface: vif1.1 = eth0 (0.0.0.0), vif1.2 = eth1 (10.0.1.1 + gw 10.0.1.2)) Bridge: xen-br0 (config as 10.0.1.2) include (vif1.2, vif0.0) xen-br1 (config as 0.0.0.0) include (vif1.1, peth0) On server domain1 I use a pppoe server. If a send a pppoe request