similar to: Samba 4.2.0: Group write permission not honored

Good Afternoon! I had thinking that maybe is a permissions problem. Then, here the files permissions: [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/resolv.conf-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 78 Jun  7 17:32 /etc/resolv.conf------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/hosts-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 193 Dec  4  2017 /etc/hosts

Hi Hmm, there is a problem with Bind9, if you reload the config, it falls over, everybody pointed at Bind9, but now I am not so sure. Could it be that it is actually a Samba problem ?? I am not sure, if this may be related. We had SAMBA-BIND-DNS problems after an upgrade from CentOS-7.4 to CentOS-7.5 We were running a self compiled samba 4.7 During the Upgrade from Centos-7.4 ->

Hi Christian we did someithing similar some month ago and I only found only a rather complicated way. 1) We extracted the normal passwd and group information getent passwd > /root/passwd.out getent group > /root/group.out deleted system user and password, converted to ASCIi and sorted computers out of passwd.out grep '\$' /root/passwd.out.ascii  >

Hi I am trying to migrate an old printserver from one samba4 (4.8.11 on CentOS-6) server to a newer one (4.11.2 on CentOS-8) using net rpc printer migrate all The migration of queue, forms, securitty, settings works, during the migration of the drivers (net rpc printer migrate drivers)? the command dumps core at the first driver Here a level10 output ???? spoolss_AddPrinterDriver: struct

Hi can you post your /etc/krb5.conf Regards Hansjörg -- Dr. Hansjörg Maurer itsystems Deutschland AG Erzgießereistr. 22 80335 München Tel: +49-89-52 04 68-41 Fax: +49-89-52 04 68-59 E-Mail: hansjoerg.maurer at itsd.de Web: http://www.itsd.de Amtsgericht München HRB 132146 USt-IdNr. DE 812991301 Steuer-Nr. 143/100/81575 Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Stefan Adam Vorstand: Dr. Michael

Good morning! After I changed some permissions and owners of some files where Rowland told me, I have the next escenary: [root at proxy ~]# systemctl status named.service ● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)    Active: active (running) since Mon 2018-06-11 08:54:10 AST; 12min ago  

I forgot to say that  I updated Centos from 7.4 to 7.5, and I updated samba4 to the new version. This Would be a problem of records of something like that. José Fermín Francisco Ferreras Registered User #579535 (LinuxCounter.net) El lunes, 11 de junio de 2018 9:45:03 a. m. GMT-4, Fermin Francisco <abcddo at yahoo.com> escribió: Sorry, the real e-mail is this: [root at pc ~]#

Good Afternoon! I had thinking that maybe is a permissions problem. Then, here the files permissions: [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/resolv.conf -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 78 Jun  7 17:32 /etc/resolv.conf------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/hosts -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 193 Dec  4  2017 /etc/hosts

Sorry, the real e-mail is this: [root at pc ~]# systemctl status named.service ● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)    Active: active (running) since Mon 2018-06-11 08:54:10 AST; 12min ago   Process: 1276 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -u named -c ${NAMEDCONF} $OPTIONS (code=exited,

>>> Hello Thomas >>> >>> Am 06.04.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Thomas Schulz: >>>> For anyone considering using Samba 4.2.0, be aware that there is a >>>> problem with group write permission not being honored. >>>> >>>> This is seen on both Linux and Solaris. We have a setup where we have >>>> project directory trees

>>>> Hello Thomas >>>> >>>> Am 06.04.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Thomas Schulz: >>>>> For anyone considering using Samba 4.2.0, be aware that there is a >>>>> problem with group write permission not being honored. >>>>> >>>>> This is seen on both Linux and Solaris. We have a setup where we have

Good catch. I had set server max protocol to NT1 after upgrading from samba 3.x to 4.x . Some windows clients had problems with SMB2 and file shares (tho this should not really be an issue with the domain controllers.) I have now set the dc's to server max protocol = SMB2 server min protocol = NT1 and the client machine to be client max protocol = SMB2

Hi I have a samba4 DC which also provides same KVM virtualisation services. During provision all IP numbers of all network interfaces where added to DNS, even the private KVM brigde Interfaces. Therefore clients which ask the DNS for AD-DNS records often get the IP of a an interface as answer, which is not reachable. This slows down things like login etc. I removed the DNS entries of the

For anyone considering using Samba 4.2.0, be aware that there is a problem with group write permission not being honored. This is seen on both Linux and Solaris. We have a setup where we have project directory trees where the files are owned by various users but also by a group that the various users are a member of. The group permissions are set to allow group write access. With Samba 4.1.* and

Hi fellow list users, I'm setting up a 4.0.3 DC and I am observing the following issue: - nsswitch.conf contains winbind for passwd and group - provisioned with use_rfc2307 - creating user with ADUC - creating group - adding Unix Attributes to user and group - 1st part of issue: ADUC throws error message (translated from German XP: "The object properties of the object could not be

Good morning! I followed your instructions Rowland, but still showme the same error: I change this lines in smb.conf: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, dns For this one: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate [root at pc ~]# systemctl status named.service●

I am confused by obtaining different results when testing for unit root when using different packages. I have 2625 price entries for which I want to determine whether they exhibit unit root. First I test using adf.test from tseries package by running: > adf.test(P, k=30) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: P Dickey-Fuller = -4.685, Lag order = 30, p-value = 0.01 alternative hypothesis:

Hi I am running a Samba PDC and a Samba member server in his domain. The member server acts as a file server with unix acl's working. Is it possible to get these acl's working under samba to? The docs seem to say, that acl's are only possible if samba is a memberserver in an NT-Domain using winbind. In my case the PDC acts as a LDAP Server and the Member server is gets the unix

Hi, we have several samba servers running as AD members (w2003 domain). Since the Upgrade to samba 3.0.8 the following message appears, when accessing a share on the memberserver from clienthost rmts2. [2004/11/10 12:09:02, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250) Username NTROBOTIC\rmts2$ is invalid on this system [2004/11/10 12:09:02, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(250)

Hi I am trying to change the password of an User in an Active Directory using the samba client tools (samba 3.0.7). A normal user can change the password using smbpasswd -r ADSERVERNAME But now a user forgetts his password, and I want to change it as an user "ADMINUSER", who has admin rights in the domain. Is there a command, weher I can do something like this: smbpasswd -r