similar to: Allowing file permissions changes with mac os x clients.

In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. $ rm test.txt rm: test.txt: Resource busy cannot remove: OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite OS X 10.9.5 Mavericks can remove: OS X 10.8.5 Mountain Lion OS X 10.7.5 Lion OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard Windows 7 Environment: Fedora rawhide samba-4.3.3-0.fc24 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = LOCALNET server string

Is it possible to backup Mac OS devices through a Samba share on Samba 4.4.6 on Fedora 24 with Time Machine? I am able to successfully advertise the share through Avahi, connect to it in Finder, and read/write files. I am also able to see the share as a destination in Time Machine, but selecting it shows an error that "The selected network backup disk does not support the required

On 02/04/15 20:53, samba wrote: > Hi All, > > at work all our clients are macs (10.10 yosemite). We are trying to > move from the classical afp file server to a samba based file server. > After a lot of testing, things now works more or less: a mac server > acts as Kerberos+OpenLDAP and a linux debian 7 box is doing the file > server with samba 4.2.0. > > A client

(example: Configure Samba to Work Better with Mac OS X [ https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_Samba_to_Work_Better_with_Mac_OS_X] ). Thanks for the suggestion though. I've now been trying out the various Apple specific flags in vfs_fruit ( https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_fruit.8.html), though with no success thus far. Example settings tried in smb.conf: [global]

Hello I am trying to integrate OS X 10.10.4 clients into existing Samba infractructure run by our IT department. We are currently using Samba 4.2.3. File share is stored on iSCSI array with ext4 filesystem which should support both ACL and XATTR. We are trying to setup vfs_fruit module to avoid possible performance problems on OS X clients. We do NOT user netatalk. Current vfs_fruit config:

On 29/10/2019 13:59, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai, > > Personaly, i agree with Todd, having a few clear examples with the samba versionnumbering in it. > > How about, adding a sub page in : > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_Samba_to_Work_Better_with_Mac_OS_X > > With something like a section that shows : "User contributed examples" > >

samba-4.2.9-0.fc22.x86_64 with the configuration below a user from a up-to-date Apple client copies a folder with some images (from the share itself) to a different subfolder * he sees the folder * it appears empty in finder - in fact it is not empty * he can not delete it * he can rename it * a different user from a Apple clients sees the files * remove the "vfs objects" line and

When you say “real symlinks on OSX” do you mean an “alias” that Finder would create? Or a Unix-type symlink using the “ ln -s file link” command in Terminal? A Finder alias is not the same as a Unix-type symlink. My NAS runs Debian Linux with version 4.3.11 of smbd; my clients are all OSX Mojave. If I create an alias using Finder on the NAS, it behaves like a normal alias in OSX UNLESS I move

Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >> >> $ rm test.txt >> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >> >> cannot remove: >> OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan >> OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite >> OS X 10.9.5

Hi Ralph, Thanks, it works as expected with 4.2.0rc2! I simply followed the manual and added this to the share's config: vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:resource = file fruit:metadata = netatalk fruit:locking = netatalk fruit:encoding = native Thanks for your help. Markus On 10.12.14 12:06, Ralph B?hme wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10:36AM +0100,

Hello, I have a unix server (arch linux) with samba 4.1.14. The share has files inside which where created directly on the server. Linux and OSX (10.10.1) clients should access the share and store files. When I mount this samba share into the osx client (10.10.1), files created directly on the server with special names like `File with "quotes"` are displayed mangled (`C7XSWH~V`) on the

Hello Mike, I know from my customers that moving files under macOS Ventura on a SMB share is a mess and completely broken by Apple (e. g. moved files cannot be opened until you reconnect). Unfortunately I do not have a ZFS-backed machine to test against available right now to confirm the behaviour. Is your order of "vfs objects? correct? Regards, Alexander > On Thursday, Mar 02, 2023 at

Hi, My log files are being flooded with errors like the ones below whenever a Mac delete files from a Samba share. [2019/07/26 14:02:26.182564, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_recycle.c:243(recycle_get_file_size) recycle: stat for Chris_Mac/._videos.docx returned No such file or directory [2019/07/26 14:02:27.186472, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_recycle.c:243(recycle_get_file_size) recycle: stat

On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > Hi, > I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > > The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > > smb.conf: > path = /export/test1/ > writable = yes > vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr > fruit:locking = netatalk > fruit:encoding = native > streams_xattr:prefix = user.

Samba is very slow through Finder on our Gigabit network (she's using a USB3 adaptor), especially when it comes to listings and such on my wife's computer. This is my samba configuration on Archlinux: http://s.natalian.org/2016-05-14/smb.conf (I'm always running the latest https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/samba/) And this what the mount looks like on the MBP: //rufie

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the reply and thank you for your work on vfs_fruit. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:40:32PM -0500, Ryan Bair wrote: > > I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The > > performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled

TL;DR: Time Machine cannot create a *new* backup on my shared drive, but can add to an *existing* backup. I'm running macOS Catalina and my Time Machine backs up to a Debian 10 server with NetAtalk and Avahi. Since Mavericks macOS has preferred SMB, and given SMB is marginally faster I decided to switch to using SMB for the Time Machine shares. On a fresh AFP share I can start a new Time

I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled the latest Samba 4.3 tarball and enabled fruit per the modules man page, however directory listing performance still takes a few seconds. I've cranked the fruit debug level up to 10 and can see that it is getting used ("fruit_stat called for

Hi. I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. The character ":" in EA name is wrong. The EAs are not seen from clients. smb.conf: [test2] path = /export/test2 writable = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:locking =

Hi, I'm very happy to see the work done on vfs_fruit. This has been a pain-point for our users for a long time now, and it seems like we're finally close to a solution. Thanks, Ralph! That said, we're still having some issues. I've installed Samba 4.2.2 from the SerNet Ubuntu package repo on a test VM running Xubuntu 14.04.2 LTS. I've set up Samba with a simple share