similar to: samba_dnsupdate failed with RuntimeError: kinit for SMB4ECONOMIA$@ECONOMIA failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm)

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dania Ramirez Moya <dania181087 at gmail.com> Date: 2015-03-27 15:32 GMT-04:00 Subject: Re:samba_dnsupdate failed with RuntimeError: kinit for SMB4ECONOMIA$@ECONOMIA failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm) To: samba <samba at lists.samba.org> 2015-03-27 14:00 GMT-04:00 <samba-request at lists.samba.org>: > Send

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dania Ramirez Moya <dania181087 at gmail.com> Date: 2015-03-30 16:45 GMT-04:00 Subject: Re: Fwd: samba_dnsupdate failed with RuntimeError: kinit for SMB4ECONOMIA$@ECONOMIA failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm) To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> Cc: samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Hello rowland I tested

Hi list: I joined Samba4.1.7 to Windows2k3 R2 domain, when I run: *samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names* IPs: ['192.168.186.137'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN} ${HOSTNAME} 389) as we are not a PDC Skipping PDC entry (SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST} ${HOSTNAME} 389) as we are not a PDC Traceback (most recent call

I tried to synchronize the sysvol folders, on two dcs. Something went wrong since yesterday we have replication problems: One machine shows this, while the other one is happy. samba-tool drs showrepl ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ourdomain,DC=com Default-First-Site-Name\DC03 via RPC DSA object GUID: af610e1a-9e3b-4cdd-a36b-c296d77a9479 Last attempt @

Found the problem. There is a DNS Problem on one machine. This happend because I was testing some samba AD settings in a virtual machine, without knowing that NAT isn't shielding this properly - this vm propagated the "new" IP to one of the dcs. DC04> ping DC03 gives wrong IP! This should be fixable with the samba-tool dns update? On 03/27/2015 01:14 PM, Johannes Amorosa |

On 28/03/15 21:15, Dania Ramirez Moya wrote: > > Hello, thank you Rowland for you response > Yes, it is.This domain was installed with a single label, just > ECONOMIA. Is that a problem? It could be, the realm name is usually the DNS domain name, whilst the windows domain name is just one word and is usually the left hand part of the realm name. i.e. if the DNS domain name is

Hello, I have a strange problem affecting samba-3.0.10-1.4E.12.2 on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 system. We have a multi-domain configuration here at University of Verona (Italy). We use Samba as PDC for several faculties. Each faculty has its own daemon instance and its own smb config file: [root@ldapvr1 ~]# ls /etc/samba/smb.* /etc/samba/smb.conf

Hola, ¿como están? Me encuentro haciendo un trabajo de Explotación de Información para la facultad y tengo un inconveniente a la hora de preparar los datos para poder operar con ellos. Tengo un atributo "Titulo Secundario" que cuenta con 139 valores diferentes (al final les dejo algunos de estos valores con la cantidad de ocurrencias de cada uno) y lo que quiero hacer es

"--seize" helped: root at pre01svdeb03:~# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at RidAllocationMasterRole owner:

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 12 juli 2019 10:24 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO infrastructure? -> 4.8.x to 4.9.x > > Am 10.07.19 um 08:40 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > > > more of this: > >

On 31/07/2019 12:04, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 31.07.19 um 12:50 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 31/07/2019 11:40, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> Am 31.07.19 um 12:32 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >>>> On 31/07/2019 11:22, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>>>> "dc" was the old name a few years ago

On 10/12/15 14:00, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> Is it possible that kdc server is always the SOA, at least if >>> derived from DNS and not specified *explicitly* in the krb5.conf? >>> >>> In my DNS-Manager console I find that >>> >>>

?? And we did compair this months ago.. You did say, everything is in sync now. Ahhh... ;-) If you really want to know if you DC's are setup the same. Tip.. Copy /etc of both server into a new folder. And runn diff -r /etc-dc1/ /etc-dc2/ > check-me.txt And check-me.txt I just did that on my brand new Buster proxy servers, 2 with keepalived. I'm almost done with this, you

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

Am 04.01.2024 um 13:28 schrieb lists--- via samba: > Am 04.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:12:57 +0100 >> lists--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> Am 04.01.2024 um 11:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:19:17 +0100 >>>> lists--- via samba <samba at

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:04:20 +0200 (CEST) tomict via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > OK, I have checked from Windows and my dns looks like this: > > DC2-| > > |- Forward Lookup Zone > > |- samdom.example.com > > You have much more dc2 entries, I only have 4 from my manual > additions. Your dns setup is the same as the setup that

Good morning :) Am 04.01.2024 um 20:17 schrieb lists--- via samba: > Am 04.01.2024 um 13:28 schrieb lists--- via samba: >> Am 04.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:12:57 +0100 >>> lists--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 04.01.2024 um 11:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:

Hello! I've followed your tutorial to change the IP Address of our Samba AD DC: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_IP_Address_of_a_Samba_AD_DC But the samba_dnsupdate tool always crashes with this output: samba_dnsupdate --verbose Unknown parameter encountered: "ks" Ignoring unknown parameter "ks" IPs: ['192.168.68.201'] Looking for DNS entry A

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made